Revert "tick: Prefer a lower rating device only if it's CPU local device"
This reverts commit 1332a90558
.
The original issue was not because of incorrect checking of cpumask for
both new and old tick device. It was incorrectly analysed was due to the
misunderstanding of the comment and misinterpretation of the return value
from tick_check_preferred. The main issue is with the clockevent driver
that sets the cpumask to cpu_all_mask instead of cpu_possible_mask.
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>
Tested-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1531151136-18297-1-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com
This commit is contained in:
parent
1e4b044d22
commit
5b5ccbc2b0
|
@ -277,8 +277,7 @@ static bool tick_check_preferred(struct clock_event_device *curdev,
|
||||||
*/
|
*/
|
||||||
return !curdev ||
|
return !curdev ||
|
||||||
newdev->rating > curdev->rating ||
|
newdev->rating > curdev->rating ||
|
||||||
(!cpumask_equal(curdev->cpumask, newdev->cpumask) &&
|
!cpumask_equal(curdev->cpumask, newdev->cpumask);
|
||||||
!tick_check_percpu(curdev, newdev, smp_processor_id()));
|
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/*
|
/*
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue