genirq: Clarify logic calculating bogus irqreturn_t values
Although irqreturn_t is an enum, we treat it (and its enumeration constants) as a bitmask. However, bad_action_ret() uses a less-than operator to determine whether an irqreturn_t falls within allowable bit values, which means we need to know the signededness of an enum type to read the logic, which is implementation-dependent. This change explicitly uses an unsigned type for the comparison. We do this instead of changing to a bitwise test, as the latter compiles to increased instructions in this hot path. It looks like we get the correct behaviour currently (bad_action_ret(-1) returns 1), so this is purely a readability fix. Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1487219049-4061-1-git-send-email-jk@ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
This commit is contained in:
parent
2f44e29cef
commit
5d4bac9a5f
|
@ -175,7 +175,9 @@ static void poll_spurious_irqs(unsigned long dummy)
|
|||
|
||||
static inline int bad_action_ret(irqreturn_t action_ret)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (likely(action_ret <= (IRQ_HANDLED | IRQ_WAKE_THREAD)))
|
||||
unsigned int r = action_ret;
|
||||
|
||||
if (likely(r <= (IRQ_HANDLED | IRQ_WAKE_THREAD)))
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue