p71924506
/
linux_old1
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity

sched/fair: Don't assign runtime for throttled cfs_rq 

do_sched_cfs_period_timer() will refill cfs_b runtime and call
distribute_cfs_runtime to unthrottle cfs_rq, sometimes cfs_b->runtime
will allocate all quota to one cfs_rq incorrectly, then other cfs_rqs
attached to this cfs_b can't get runtime and will be throttled.

We find that one throttled cfs_rq has non-negative
cfs_rq->runtime_remaining and cause an unexpetced cast from s64 to u64
in snippet:

  distribute_cfs_runtime() {
    runtime = -cfs_rq->runtime_remaining + 1;
  }

The runtime here will change to a large number and consume all
cfs_b->runtime in this cfs_b period.

According to Ben Segall, the throttled cfs_rq can have
account_cfs_rq_runtime called on it because it is throttled before
idle_balance, and the idle_balance calls update_rq_clock to add time
that is accounted to the task.

This commit prevents cfs_rq to be assgined new runtime if it has been
throttled until that distribute_cfs_runtime is called.

Signed-off-by: Liangyan <liangyan.peng@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: shanpeic@linux.alibaba.com
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: xlpang@linux.alibaba.com
Fixes: d3d9dc3302 ("sched: Throttle entities exceeding their allowed bandwidth")
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190826121633.6538-1-liangyan.peng@linux.alibaba.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Liangyan 2019-08-26 20:16:33 +08:00 committed by Ingo Molnar
parent 089cf7f6ec
commit 5e2d2cc258
1 changed files with 5 additions and 0 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

5
kernel/sched/fair.c
View File

@ -4470,6 +4470,8 @@ static void __account_cfs_rq_runtime(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, u64 delta_exec)
if (likely(cfs_rq->runtime_remaining > 0))
return;
if (cfs_rq->throttled)
return;
/*
* if we're unable to extend our runtime we resched so that the active
* hierarchy can be throttled
@ -4673,6 +4675,9 @@ static u64 distribute_cfs_runtime(struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b,
if (!cfs_rq_throttled(cfs_rq))
goto next;
/* By the above check, this should never be true */
SCHED_WARN_ON(cfs_rq->runtime_remaining > 0);
runtime = -cfs_rq->runtime_remaining + 1;
if (runtime > remaining)
runtime = remaining;