p71924506
/
linux_old1
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity

i915: fix ACPI _DSM warning 

Since commit 29a241c (ACPICA: Add argument typechecking for all
predefined ACPI names), _DSM parameters are validated which trigger the
following warning:

    ACPI Warning: \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Integer], ACPI requires [Package] (20130517/nsarguments-95)
    ACPI Warning: \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Integer], ACPI requires [Package] (20130517/nsarguments-95)
    ACPI Warning: \_SB_.PCI0.P0P2.PEGP._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Integer], ACPI requires [Package] (20130517/nsarguments-95)
    ACPI Warning: \_SB_.PCI0.P0P2.PEGP._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Integer], ACPI requires [Package] (20130517/nsarguments-95)

As the Intel _DSM method seems to ignore this parameter, let's comply to
the ACPI spec and use a Package instead.

Signed-off-by: Peter Wu <lekensteyn@gmail.com>
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32602
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
This commit is contained in:
Peter Wu 2013-08-01 18:21:28 +02:00 committed by Daniel Vetter
parent 2960bc9cce
commit 6d5c2d8ca3
1 changed files with 8 additions and 6 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

14
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_acpi.c
View File

@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ static const u8 intel_dsm_guid[] = {
0x0f, 0x13, 0x17, 0xb0, 0x1c, 0x2c
};
static int intel_dsm(acpi_handle handle, int func, int arg)
static int intel_dsm(acpi_handle handle, int func)
{
struct acpi_buffer output = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL };
struct acpi_object_list input;
@ -46,8 +46,9 @@ static int intel_dsm(acpi_handle handle, int func, int arg)
params[1].integer.value = INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID;
params[2].type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER;
params[2].integer.value = func;
params[3].type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER;
params[3].integer.value = arg;
params[3].type = ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE;
params[3].package.count = 0;
params[3].package.elements = NULL;
ret = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, "_DSM", &input, &output);
if (ret) {
@ -151,8 +152,9 @@ static void intel_dsm_platform_mux_info(void)
params[1].integer.value = INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID;
params[2].type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER;
params[2].integer.value = INTEL_DSM_FN_PLATFORM_MUX_INFO;
params[3].type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER;
params[3].integer.value = 0;
params[3].type = ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE;
params[3].package.count = 0;
params[3].package.elements = NULL;
ret = acpi_evaluate_object(intel_dsm_priv.dhandle, "_DSM", &input,
&output);
@ -205,7 +207,7 @@ static bool intel_dsm_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev)
return false;
}
ret = intel_dsm(dhandle, INTEL_DSM_FN_SUPPORTED_FUNCTIONS, 0);
ret = intel_dsm(dhandle, INTEL_DSM_FN_SUPPORTED_FUNCTIONS);
if (ret < 0) {
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("failed to get supported _DSM functions\n");
return false;