p71924506
/
linux_old1
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity

ipv6: replacing a rt6_info needs to purge possible propagated rt6_infos too 

Lubomir Rintel reported that during replacing a route the interface
reference counter isn't correctly decremented.

To quote bug <https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91941>:
| [root@rhel7-5 lkundrak]# sh -x lal
| + ip link add dev0 type dummy
| + ip link set dev0 up
| + ip link add dev1 type dummy
| + ip link set dev1 up
| + ip addr add 2001:db8:8086::2/64 dev dev0
| + ip route add 2001:db8:8086::/48 dev dev0 proto static metric 20
| + ip route add 2001:db8:8088::/48 dev dev1 proto static metric 10
| + ip route replace 2001:db8:8086::/48 dev dev1 proto static metric 20
| + ip link del dev0 type dummy
| Message from syslogd@rhel7-5 at Jan 23 10:54:41 ...
|  kernel:unregister_netdevice: waiting for dev0 to become free. Usage count = 2
|
| Message from syslogd@rhel7-5 at Jan 23 10:54:51 ...
|  kernel:unregister_netdevice: waiting for dev0 to become free. Usage count = 2

During replacement of a rt6_info we must walk all parent nodes and check
if the to be replaced rt6_info got propagated. If so, replace it with
an alive one.

Fixes: 4a287eba2d ("IPv6 routing, NLM_F_* flag support: REPLACE and EXCL flags support, warn about missing CREATE flag")
Reported-by: Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@v3.sk>
Signed-off-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
Tested-by: Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@v3.sk>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
Hannes Frederic Sowa 2015-01-26 15:11:17 +01:00 committed by David S. Miller
parent 225776098b
commit 6e9e16e614
1 changed files with 26 additions and 19 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

45
net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c
View File

@ -659,6 +659,29 @@ static int fib6_commit_metrics(struct dst_entry *dst,
return 0;
}
static void fib6_purge_rt(struct rt6_info *rt, struct fib6_node *fn,
struct net *net)
{
if (atomic_read(&rt->rt6i_ref) != 1) {
/* This route is used as dummy address holder in some split
* nodes. It is not leaked, but it still holds other resources,
* which must be released in time. So, scan ascendant nodes
* and replace dummy references to this route with references
* to still alive ones.
*/
while (fn) {
if (!(fn->fn_flags & RTN_RTINFO) && fn->leaf == rt) {
fn->leaf = fib6_find_prefix(net, fn);
atomic_inc(&fn->leaf->rt6i_ref);
rt6_release(rt);
}
fn = fn->parent;
}
/* No more references are possible at this point. */
BUG_ON(atomic_read(&rt->rt6i_ref) != 1);
}
}
/*
* Insert routing information in a node.
*/
@ -807,11 +830,12 @@ static int fib6_add_rt2node(struct fib6_node *fn, struct rt6_info *rt,
rt->dst.rt6_next = iter->dst.rt6_next;
atomic_inc(&rt->rt6i_ref);
inet6_rt_notify(RTM_NEWROUTE, rt, info);
rt6_release(iter);
if (!(fn->fn_flags & RTN_RTINFO)) {
info->nl_net->ipv6.rt6_stats->fib_route_nodes++;
fn->fn_flags |= RTN_RTINFO;
}
fib6_purge_rt(iter, fn, info->nl_net);
rt6_release(iter);
}
return 0;
@ -1322,24 +1346,7 @@ static void fib6_del_route(struct fib6_node *fn, struct rt6_info **rtp,
fn = fib6_repair_tree(net, fn);
}
if (atomic_read(&rt->rt6i_ref) != 1) {
/* This route is used as dummy address holder in some split
* nodes. It is not leaked, but it still holds other resources,
* which must be released in time. So, scan ascendant nodes
* and replace dummy references to this route with references
* to still alive ones.
*/
while (fn) {
if (!(fn->fn_flags & RTN_RTINFO) && fn->leaf == rt) {
fn->leaf = fib6_find_prefix(net, fn);
atomic_inc(&fn->leaf->rt6i_ref);
rt6_release(rt);
}
fn = fn->parent;
}
/* No more references are possible at this point. */
BUG_ON(atomic_read(&rt->rt6i_ref) != 1);
}
fib6_purge_rt(rt, fn, net);
inet6_rt_notify(RTM_DELROUTE, rt, info);
rt6_release(rt);