lockdep: Remove save argument from check_prev_add()
There is only one caller which hands in save_trace as function pointer. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com> Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com> Cc: kasan-dev@googlegroups.com Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> Cc: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de> Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Cc: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com> Cc: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Cc: dm-devel@redhat.com Cc: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com> Cc: Alasdair Kergon <agk@redhat.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@linux.intel.com> Cc: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190425094802.803362058@linutronix.de
This commit is contained in:
parent
b1abe4622d
commit
76b14436b4
|
@ -2158,8 +2158,7 @@ check_deadlock(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *next,
|
|||
*/
|
||||
static int
|
||||
check_prev_add(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *prev,
|
||||
struct held_lock *next, int distance, struct stack_trace *trace,
|
||||
int (*save)(struct stack_trace *trace))
|
||||
struct held_lock *next, int distance, struct stack_trace *trace)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct lock_list *uninitialized_var(target_entry);
|
||||
struct lock_list *entry;
|
||||
|
@ -2199,11 +2198,11 @@ check_prev_add(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *prev,
|
|||
if (unlikely(!ret)) {
|
||||
if (!trace->entries) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If @save fails here, the printing might trigger
|
||||
* a WARN but because of the !nr_entries it should
|
||||
* not do bad things.
|
||||
* If save_trace fails here, the printing might
|
||||
* trigger a WARN but because of the !nr_entries it
|
||||
* should not do bad things.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
save(trace);
|
||||
save_trace(trace);
|
||||
}
|
||||
return print_circular_bug(&this, target_entry, next, prev);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -2253,7 +2252,7 @@ check_prev_add(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *prev,
|
|||
return print_bfs_bug(ret);
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if (!trace->entries && !save(trace))
|
||||
if (!trace->entries && !save_trace(trace))
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
@ -2318,7 +2317,8 @@ check_prevs_add(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *next)
|
|||
* added:
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (hlock->read != 2 && hlock->check) {
|
||||
int ret = check_prev_add(curr, hlock, next, distance, &trace, save_trace);
|
||||
int ret = check_prev_add(curr, hlock, next, distance,
|
||||
&trace);
|
||||
if (!ret)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue