drm/i915: Ignore long hpds on eDP ports
Turning vdd on/off can generate a long hpd pulse on eDP ports. In order to handle hpd we would need to turn on vdd to perform aux transfers. This would lead to an endless cycle of "vdd off -> long hpd -> vdd on -> detect -> vdd off -> ..." So ignore long hpd pulses on eDP ports. eDP panels should be physically tied to the machine anyway so they should not actually disappear and thus don't need long hpd handling. Short hpds are still needed for link re-train and whatnot so we can't just turn off the hpd interrupt entirely for eDP ports. Perhaps we could turn it off whenever the panel is disabled, but just ignoring the long hpd seems sufficient. Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Todd Previte <tprevite@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
f6a1906674
commit
7a7f84ccb8
|
@ -4498,6 +4498,18 @@ intel_dp_hpd_pulse(struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port, bool long_hpd)
|
|||
if (intel_dig_port->base.type != INTEL_OUTPUT_EDP)
|
||||
intel_dig_port->base.type = INTEL_OUTPUT_DISPLAYPORT;
|
||||
|
||||
if (long_hpd && intel_dig_port->base.type == INTEL_OUTPUT_EDP) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* vdd off can generate a long pulse on eDP which
|
||||
* would require vdd on to handle it, and thus we
|
||||
* would end up in an endless cycle of
|
||||
* "vdd off -> long hpd -> vdd on -> detect -> vdd off -> ..."
|
||||
*/
|
||||
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("ignoring long hpd on eDP port %c\n",
|
||||
port_name(intel_dig_port->port));
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("got hpd irq on port %c - %s\n",
|
||||
port_name(intel_dig_port->port),
|
||||
long_hpd ? "long" : "short");
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue