libbpf: Assume unsigned values for BTF_KIND_ENUM
Currently, BTF_KIND_ENUM type doesn't record whether enum values should be interpreted as signed or unsigned. In Linux, most enums are unsigned, though, so interpreting them as unsigned matches real world better. Change btf_dump test case to test maximum 32-bit value, instead of negative value. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200303003233.3496043-3-andriin@fb.com
This commit is contained in:
parent
1aae4bdd78
commit
7cb30aaab3
|
@ -916,13 +916,13 @@ static void btf_dump_emit_enum_def(struct btf_dump *d, __u32 id,
|
|||
/* enumerators share namespace with typedef idents */
|
||||
dup_cnt = btf_dump_name_dups(d, d->ident_names, name);
|
||||
if (dup_cnt > 1) {
|
||||
btf_dump_printf(d, "\n%s%s___%zu = %d,",
|
||||
btf_dump_printf(d, "\n%s%s___%zu = %u,",
|
||||
pfx(lvl + 1), name, dup_cnt,
|
||||
(__s32)v->val);
|
||||
(__u32)v->val);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
btf_dump_printf(d, "\n%s%s = %d,",
|
||||
btf_dump_printf(d, "\n%s%s = %u,",
|
||||
pfx(lvl + 1), name,
|
||||
(__s32)v->val);
|
||||
(__u32)v->val);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
btf_dump_printf(d, "\n%s}", pfx(lvl));
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ enum e1 {
|
|||
|
||||
enum e2 {
|
||||
C = 100,
|
||||
D = -100,
|
||||
D = 4294967295,
|
||||
E = 0,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue