zsmalloc: fixup trivial zs size classes value in comments
According to calculation, ZS_SIZE_CLASSES value is 255 on systems with 4K page size, not 254. The old value may forget count the ZS_MIN_ALLOC_SIZE in. This patch fixes this trivial issue in the comments. Signed-off-by: Weijie Yang <weijie.yang@samsung.com> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
50417c5556
commit
7eb52512a9
|
@ -141,7 +141,7 @@
|
|||
#define ZS_MAX_ALLOC_SIZE PAGE_SIZE
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* On systems with 4K page size, this gives 254 size classes! There is a
|
||||
* On systems with 4K page size, this gives 255 size classes! There is a
|
||||
* trader-off here:
|
||||
* - Large number of size classes is potentially wasteful as free page are
|
||||
* spread across these classes
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue