p71924506
/
linux_old1
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity

test_rhashtable: remove semaphore usage 

This is one of only two files that initialize a semaphore to a negative
value. We don't really need the two semaphores here at all, but can do
the same thing in more conventional and more effient way, by using a
single waitqueue and an atomic thread counter.

This gets us a little bit closer to eliminating classic semaphores from
the kernel. It also fixes a corner case where we fail to continue after
one of the threads fails to start up.

An alternative would be to use a split kthread_create()+wake_up_process()
and completely eliminate the separate synchronization.

Acked-by: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
Arnd Bergmann 2018-12-16 20:48:21 +01:00 committed by David S. Miller
parent fa7b28c11b
commit 809c670591
1 changed files with 19 additions and 13 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

32
lib/test_rhashtable.c
View File

@ -20,11 +20,11 @@
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
#include <linux/rhashtable.h>
#include <linux/semaphore.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/sched.h>
#include <linux/random.h>
#include <linux/vmalloc.h>
#include <linux/wait.h>
#define MAX_ENTRIES 1000000
#define TEST_INSERT_FAIL INT_MAX
@ -112,8 +112,8 @@ static struct rhashtable_params test_rht_params_dup = {
.automatic_shrinking = false,
};
static struct semaphore prestart_sem;
static struct semaphore startup_sem = __SEMAPHORE_INITIALIZER(startup_sem, 0);
static atomic_t startup_count;
static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(startup_wait);
static int insert_retry(struct rhashtable *ht, struct test_obj *obj,
const struct rhashtable_params params)
@ -634,9 +634,12 @@ static int threadfunc(void *data)
int i, step, err = 0, insert_retries = 0;
struct thread_data *tdata = data;
up(&prestart_sem);
if (down_interruptible(&startup_sem))
pr_err(" thread[%d]: down_interruptible failed\n", tdata->id);
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&startup_count))
wake_up(&startup_wait);
if (wait_event_interruptible(startup_wait, atomic_read(&startup_count) == -1)) {
pr_err(" thread[%d]: interrupted\n", tdata->id);
goto out;
}
for (i = 0; i < tdata->entries; i++) {
tdata->objs[i].value.id = i;
@ -755,7 +758,7 @@ static int __init test_rht_init(void)
pr_info("Testing concurrent rhashtable access from %d threads\n",
tcount);
sema_init(&prestart_sem, 1 - tcount);
atomic_set(&startup_count, tcount);
tdata = vzalloc(array_size(tcount, sizeof(struct thread_data)));
if (!tdata)
return -ENOMEM;
@ -781,15 +784,18 @@ static int __init test_rht_init(void)
tdata[i].objs = objs + i * entries;
tdata[i].task = kthread_run(threadfunc, &tdata[i],
"rhashtable_thrad[%d]", i);
if (IS_ERR(tdata[i].task))
if (IS_ERR(tdata[i].task)) {
pr_err(" kthread_run failed for thread %d\n", i);
else
atomic_dec(&startup_count);
} else {
started_threads++;
}
}
if (down_interruptible(&prestart_sem))
pr_err(" down interruptible failed\n");
for (i = 0; i < tcount; i++)
up(&startup_sem);
if (wait_event_interruptible(startup_wait, atomic_read(&startup_count) == 0))
pr_err(" wait_event interruptible failed\n");
/* count is 0 now, set it to -1 and wake up all threads together */
atomic_dec(&startup_count);
wake_up_all(&startup_wait);
for (i = 0; i < tcount; i++) {
if (IS_ERR(tdata[i].task))
continue;