mm: fix some spelling mistakes in comments
Fix some spelling mistakes in comments: udpate ==> update succesful ==> successful exmaple ==> example unneccessary ==> unnecessary stoping ==> stopping uknown ==> unknown Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201127011747.86005-1-shihaitao1@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Haitao Shi <shihaitao1@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
ff5c19ed4b
commit
8958b24911
|
@ -1359,7 +1359,7 @@ static int __wait_on_page_locked_async(struct page *page,
|
|||
else
|
||||
ret = PageLocked(page);
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If we were succesful now, we know we're still on the
|
||||
* If we were successful now, we know we're still on the
|
||||
* waitqueue as we're still under the lock. This means it's
|
||||
* safe to remove and return success, we know the callback
|
||||
* isn't going to trigger.
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -2391,7 +2391,7 @@ static void __split_huge_page_tail(struct page *head, int tail,
|
|||
* Clone page flags before unfreezing refcount.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* After successful get_page_unless_zero() might follow flags change,
|
||||
* for exmaple lock_page() which set PG_waiters.
|
||||
* for example lock_page() which set PG_waiters.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
page_tail->flags &= ~PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_PREP;
|
||||
page_tail->flags |= (head->flags &
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1275,7 +1275,7 @@ static int khugepaged_scan_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm,
|
|||
* PTEs are armed with uffd write protection.
|
||||
* Here we can also mark the new huge pmd as
|
||||
* write protected if any of the small ones is
|
||||
* marked but that could bring uknown
|
||||
* marked but that could bring unknown
|
||||
* userfault messages that falls outside of
|
||||
* the registered range. So, just be simple.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -871,7 +871,7 @@ int __init_memblock memblock_physmem_add(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
|
|||
* @base: base address of the region
|
||||
* @size: size of the region
|
||||
* @set: set or clear the flag
|
||||
* @flag: the flag to udpate
|
||||
* @flag: the flag to update
|
||||
*
|
||||
* This function isolates region [@base, @base + @size), and sets/clears flag
|
||||
*
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -2594,7 +2594,7 @@ static bool migrate_vma_check_page(struct page *page)
|
|||
* will bump the page reference count. Sadly there is no way to
|
||||
* differentiate a regular pin from migration wait. Hence to
|
||||
* avoid 2 racing thread trying to migrate back to CPU to enter
|
||||
* infinite loop (one stoping migration because the other is
|
||||
* infinite loop (one stopping migration because the other is
|
||||
* waiting on pte migration entry). We always return true here.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* FIXME proper solution is to rework migration_entry_wait() so
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
|
|||
*
|
||||
* The need callback is used to decide whether extended memory allocation is
|
||||
* needed or not. Sometimes users want to deactivate some features in this
|
||||
* boot and extra memory would be unneccessary. In this case, to avoid
|
||||
* boot and extra memory would be unnecessary. In this case, to avoid
|
||||
* allocating huge chunk of memory, each clients represent their need of
|
||||
* extra memory through the need callback. If one of the need callbacks
|
||||
* returns true, it means that someone needs extra memory so that
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue