locking/lockdep: Refactorize check_noncircular and check_redundant
These two functions now handle different check results themselves. A new check_path function is added to check whether there is a path in the dependency graph. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: bvanassche@acm.org Cc: frederic@kernel.org Cc: ming.lei@redhat.com Cc: will.deacon@arm.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190506081939.74287-20-duyuyang@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
b4adfe8e05
commit
8c2c2b449a
|
@ -1683,33 +1683,90 @@ unsigned long lockdep_count_backward_deps(struct lock_class *class)
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Prove that the dependency graph starting at <entry> can not
|
||||
* lead to <target>. Print an error and return 0 if it does.
|
||||
* Check that the dependency graph starting at <src> can lead to
|
||||
* <target> or not. Print an error and return 0 if it does.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static noinline int
|
||||
check_noncircular(struct lock_list *root, struct lock_class *target,
|
||||
struct lock_list **target_entry)
|
||||
check_path(struct lock_class *target, struct lock_list *src_entry,
|
||||
struct lock_list **target_entry)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int result;
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
|
||||
ret = __bfs_forwards(src_entry, (void *)target, class_equal,
|
||||
target_entry);
|
||||
|
||||
if (unlikely(ret < 0))
|
||||
print_bfs_bug(ret);
|
||||
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Prove that the dependency graph starting at <src> can not
|
||||
* lead to <target>. If it can, there is a circle when adding
|
||||
* <target> -> <src> dependency.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Print an error and return 0 if it does.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static noinline int
|
||||
check_noncircular(struct held_lock *src, struct held_lock *target,
|
||||
struct lock_trace *trace)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
struct lock_list *uninitialized_var(target_entry);
|
||||
struct lock_list src_entry = {
|
||||
.class = hlock_class(src),
|
||||
.parent = NULL,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
debug_atomic_inc(nr_cyclic_checks);
|
||||
|
||||
result = __bfs_forwards(root, target, class_equal, target_entry);
|
||||
ret = check_path(hlock_class(target), &src_entry, &target_entry);
|
||||
|
||||
return result;
|
||||
if (unlikely(!ret)) {
|
||||
if (!trace->nr_entries) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If save_trace fails here, the printing might
|
||||
* trigger a WARN but because of the !nr_entries it
|
||||
* should not do bad things.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
save_trace(trace);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
print_circular_bug(&src_entry, target_entry, src, target);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Check that the dependency graph starting at <src> can lead to
|
||||
* <target> or not. If it can, <src> -> <target> dependency is already
|
||||
* in the graph.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Print an error and return 2 if it does or 1 if it does not.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static noinline int
|
||||
check_redundant(struct lock_list *root, struct lock_class *target,
|
||||
struct lock_list **target_entry)
|
||||
check_redundant(struct held_lock *src, struct held_lock *target)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int result;
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
struct lock_list *uninitialized_var(target_entry);
|
||||
struct lock_list src_entry = {
|
||||
.class = hlock_class(src),
|
||||
.parent = NULL,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
debug_atomic_inc(nr_redundant_checks);
|
||||
|
||||
result = __bfs_forwards(root, target, class_equal, target_entry);
|
||||
ret = check_path(hlock_class(target), &src_entry, &target_entry);
|
||||
|
||||
return result;
|
||||
if (!ret) {
|
||||
debug_atomic_inc(nr_redundant);
|
||||
ret = 2;
|
||||
} else if (ret < 0)
|
||||
ret = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS
|
||||
|
@ -2307,9 +2364,7 @@ static int
|
|||
check_prev_add(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *prev,
|
||||
struct held_lock *next, int distance, struct lock_trace *trace)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct lock_list *uninitialized_var(target_entry);
|
||||
struct lock_list *entry;
|
||||
struct lock_list this;
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!hlock_class(prev)->key || !hlock_class(next)->key) {
|
||||
|
@ -2340,25 +2395,9 @@ check_prev_add(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *prev,
|
|||
* MAX_CIRCULAR_QUEUE_SIZE) which keeps track of a breadth of nodes
|
||||
* in the graph whose neighbours are to be checked.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
this.class = hlock_class(next);
|
||||
this.parent = NULL;
|
||||
ret = check_noncircular(&this, hlock_class(prev), &target_entry);
|
||||
if (unlikely(!ret)) {
|
||||
if (!trace->nr_entries) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If save_trace fails here, the printing might
|
||||
* trigger a WARN but because of the !nr_entries it
|
||||
* should not do bad things.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
save_trace(trace);
|
||||
}
|
||||
print_circular_bug(&this, target_entry, next, prev);
|
||||
ret = check_noncircular(next, prev, trace);
|
||||
if (unlikely(ret <= 0))
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
else if (unlikely(ret < 0)) {
|
||||
print_bfs_bug(ret);
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (!check_irq_usage(curr, prev, next))
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
@ -2392,18 +2431,9 @@ check_prev_add(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *prev,
|
|||
/*
|
||||
* Is the <prev> -> <next> link redundant?
|
||||
*/
|
||||
this.class = hlock_class(prev);
|
||||
this.parent = NULL;
|
||||
ret = check_redundant(&this, hlock_class(next), &target_entry);
|
||||
if (!ret) {
|
||||
debug_atomic_inc(nr_redundant);
|
||||
return 2;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (ret < 0) {
|
||||
print_bfs_bug(ret);
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ret = check_redundant(prev, next);
|
||||
if (ret != 1)
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!trace->nr_entries && !save_trace(trace))
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue