btrfs: reduce stack usage for btrfsic_process_written_block
btrfsic_process_written_block() cals btrfsic_process_metablock(),
which has a fairly large stack usage due to the btrfsic_stack_frame
variable. It also calls btrfsic_test_for_metadata(), which now
needs several hundreds of bytes for its SHASH_DESC_ON_STACK().
In some configurations, we end up with both functions on the
same stack, and gcc warns about the excessive stack usage that
might cause the available stack space to run out:
fs/btrfs/check-integrity.c:1743:13: error: stack frame size of 1152 bytes in function 'btrfsic_process_written_block' [-Werror,-Wframe-larger-than=]
Marking both child functions as noinline_for_stack helps because
this guarantees that the large variables are not on the same
stack frame.
Fixes: d5178578bc
("btrfs: directly call into crypto framework for checksumming")
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
99fccf33c2
commit
8ddc319706
|
@ -940,7 +940,7 @@ static void btrfsic_stack_frame_free(struct btrfsic_stack_frame *sf)
|
|||
kfree(sf);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int btrfsic_process_metablock(
|
||||
static noinline_for_stack int btrfsic_process_metablock(
|
||||
struct btrfsic_state *state,
|
||||
struct btrfsic_block *const first_block,
|
||||
struct btrfsic_block_data_ctx *const first_block_ctx,
|
||||
|
@ -1706,8 +1706,9 @@ static void btrfsic_dump_database(struct btrfsic_state *state)
|
|||
* Test whether the disk block contains a tree block (leaf or node)
|
||||
* (note that this test fails for the super block)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static int btrfsic_test_for_metadata(struct btrfsic_state *state,
|
||||
char **datav, unsigned int num_pages)
|
||||
static noinline_for_stack int btrfsic_test_for_metadata(
|
||||
struct btrfsic_state *state,
|
||||
char **datav, unsigned int num_pages)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = state->fs_info;
|
||||
SHASH_DESC_ON_STACK(shash, fs_info->csum_shash);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue