btrfs: check_int: propagate out-of-memory error upwards
This issue was not causing any harm but IMO (and in the opinion of the static code checker) it is better to propagate this error status upwards. Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
61391d5622
commit
98806b446d
|
@ -1093,6 +1093,7 @@ static int btrfsic_process_metablock(
|
|||
next_stack =
|
||||
btrfsic_stack_frame_alloc();
|
||||
if (NULL == next_stack) {
|
||||
sf->error = -1;
|
||||
btrfsic_release_block_ctx(
|
||||
&sf->
|
||||
next_block_ctx);
|
||||
|
@ -1190,8 +1191,10 @@ static int btrfsic_process_metablock(
|
|||
sf->next_block_ctx.datav[0];
|
||||
|
||||
next_stack = btrfsic_stack_frame_alloc();
|
||||
if (NULL == next_stack)
|
||||
if (NULL == next_stack) {
|
||||
sf->error = -1;
|
||||
goto one_stack_frame_backwards;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
next_stack->i = -1;
|
||||
next_stack->block = sf->next_block;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue