perf/x86/hw_breakpoints: Improve range breakpoint validation
Range breakpoints will do the wrong thing if the address isn't aligned. While we're there, add comments about why it's safe for instruction breakpoints. Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/ae25d14d61f2f43b78e0a247e469f3072df7e201.1438312874.git.luto@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
e5779e8e12
commit
ab513927ab
|
@ -291,8 +291,18 @@ static int arch_build_bp_info(struct perf_event *bp)
|
|||
break;
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
default:
|
||||
/* AMD range breakpoint */
|
||||
if (!is_power_of_2(bp->attr.bp_len))
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
if (bp->attr.bp_addr & (bp->attr.bp_len - 1))
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* It's impossible to use a range breakpoint to fake out
|
||||
* user vs kernel detection because bp_len - 1 can't
|
||||
* have the high bit set. If we ever allow range instruction
|
||||
* breakpoints, then we'll have to check for kprobe-blacklisted
|
||||
* addresses anywhere in the range.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!cpu_has_bpext)
|
||||
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
|
||||
info->mask = bp->attr.bp_len - 1;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue