mtd: spi-nor: intel: provide a range for poll_timout
The overall poll time here is INTEL_SPI_TIMEOUT * 1000 which is 5000 * 1000 - so 5seconds and it is coded as a tight loop here delay_us to readl_poll_timeout() is set to 0. As this is never called in an atomic context sleeping should be no issue and there is no reasons for the tight-loop here. Signed-off-by: Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@hofr.at> Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
dd50a1c4e5
commit
aba3a882a1
|
@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ static int intel_spi_wait_hw_busy(struct intel_spi *ispi)
|
|||
u32 val;
|
||||
|
||||
return readl_poll_timeout(ispi->base + HSFSTS_CTL, val,
|
||||
!(val & HSFSTS_CTL_SCIP), 0,
|
||||
!(val & HSFSTS_CTL_SCIP), 40,
|
||||
INTEL_SPI_TIMEOUT * 1000);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -296,7 +296,7 @@ static int intel_spi_wait_sw_busy(struct intel_spi *ispi)
|
|||
u32 val;
|
||||
|
||||
return readl_poll_timeout(ispi->sregs + SSFSTS_CTL, val,
|
||||
!(val & SSFSTS_CTL_SCIP), 0,
|
||||
!(val & SSFSTS_CTL_SCIP), 40,
|
||||
INTEL_SPI_TIMEOUT * 1000);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue