timers: Make internal_add_timer() update ->next_timer if ->active_timers == 0
The internal_add_timer() function updates base->next_timer only if timer->expires < base->next_timer. This is correct, but it also makes sense to do the same if we add the first non-deferrable timer. Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Tested-by: Mike Galbraith <bitbucket@online.de>
This commit is contained in:
parent
18d8cb64c9
commit
aea369b959
|
@ -404,9 +404,9 @@ static void internal_add_timer(struct tvec_base *base, struct timer_list *timer)
|
|||
* Update base->active_timers and base->next_timer
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!tbase_get_deferrable(timer->base)) {
|
||||
if (time_before(timer->expires, base->next_timer))
|
||||
if (!base->active_timers++ ||
|
||||
time_before(timer->expires, base->next_timer))
|
||||
base->next_timer = timer->expires;
|
||||
base->active_timers++;
|
||||
}
|
||||
base->all_timers++;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue