drm/i915: Don't write IVB_FBC_RT_BASE
We use nuking instead of render tracking on IVB+, so there's no point in writing IVB_FBC_RT_BASE. v2: Drop the IVB_FBC_RT_BASE write too v3: Move the SNB stuff elsewhere, leaving only IVB+ here Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
This commit is contained in:
parent
0e5539b923
commit
b339088d81
|
@ -283,8 +283,6 @@ static void gen7_enable_fbc(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
|
|||
struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj = intel_fb->obj;
|
||||
struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc);
|
||||
|
||||
I915_WRITE(IVB_FBC_RT_BASE, i915_gem_obj_ggtt_offset(obj));
|
||||
|
||||
I915_WRITE(ILK_DPFC_CONTROL, DPFC_CTL_EN | DPFC_CTL_LIMIT_1X |
|
||||
IVB_DPFC_CTL_FENCE_EN |
|
||||
intel_crtc->plane << IVB_DPFC_CTL_PLANE_SHIFT);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue