mm/list_lru.c: revert "mm/list_lru: optimize memcg_reparent_list_lru_node()"
Commit405cc51fc1
("mm/list_lru: optimize memcg_reparent_list_lru_node()") has subtle races which are proving ugly to fix. Revert the original optimization. If quantitative testing indicates that we have a significant problem here then other implementations can be looked at. Fixes:405cc51fc1
("mm/list_lru: optimize memcg_reparent_list_lru_node()") Acked-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
0347b2b95c
commit
b33e104447
|
@ -394,12 +394,6 @@ static void memcg_reparent_list_lru_node(struct list_lru *lru, int nid,
|
||||||
int dst_idx = dst_memcg->kmemcg_id;
|
int dst_idx = dst_memcg->kmemcg_id;
|
||||||
struct list_lru_one *src, *dst;
|
struct list_lru_one *src, *dst;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/*
|
|
||||||
* If there is no lru entry in this nlru, we can skip it immediately.
|
|
||||||
*/
|
|
||||||
if (!READ_ONCE(nlru->nr_items))
|
|
||||||
return;
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/*
|
/*
|
||||||
* Since list_lru_{add,del} may be called under an IRQ-safe lock,
|
* Since list_lru_{add,del} may be called under an IRQ-safe lock,
|
||||||
* we have to use IRQ-safe primitives here to avoid deadlock.
|
* we have to use IRQ-safe primitives here to avoid deadlock.
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue