PM / Domains: Factorize dev_pm_genpd_set_performance_state()

Separate out _genpd_set_performance_state() and
_genpd_reeval_performance_state() from
dev_pm_genpd_set_performance_state() to handle performance state update
related stuff. This will be used by a later commit.

Tested-by: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
Viresh Kumar 2018-10-31 14:56:54 +05:30
parent 1067ae3e42
commit cd50c6d3eb
1 changed files with 55 additions and 40 deletions

View File

@ -239,6 +239,56 @@ static void genpd_update_accounting(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
static inline void genpd_update_accounting(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd) {}
#endif
static int _genpd_reeval_performance_state(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd,
unsigned int state)
{
struct generic_pm_domain_data *pd_data;
struct pm_domain_data *pdd;
/* New requested state is same as Max requested state */
if (state == genpd->performance_state)
return state;
/* New requested state is higher than Max requested state */
if (state > genpd->performance_state)
return state;
/* Traverse all devices within the domain */
list_for_each_entry(pdd, &genpd->dev_list, list_node) {
pd_data = to_gpd_data(pdd);
if (pd_data->performance_state > state)
state = pd_data->performance_state;
}
/*
* We aren't propagating performance state changes of a subdomain to its
* masters as we don't have hardware that needs it. Over that, the
* performance states of subdomain and its masters may not have
* one-to-one mapping and would require additional information. We can
* get back to this once we have hardware that needs it. For that
* reason, we don't have to consider performance state of the subdomains
* of genpd here.
*/
return state;
}
static int _genpd_set_performance_state(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd,
unsigned int state)
{
int ret;
if (state == genpd->performance_state)
return 0;
ret = genpd->set_performance_state(genpd, state);
if (ret)
return ret;
genpd->performance_state = state;
return 0;
}
/**
* dev_pm_genpd_set_performance_state- Set performance state of device's power
* domain.
@ -257,10 +307,9 @@ static inline void genpd_update_accounting(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd) {}
int dev_pm_genpd_set_performance_state(struct device *dev, unsigned int state)
{
struct generic_pm_domain *genpd;
struct generic_pm_domain_data *gpd_data, *pd_data;
struct pm_domain_data *pdd;
struct generic_pm_domain_data *gpd_data;
unsigned int prev;
int ret = 0;
int ret;
genpd = dev_to_genpd(dev);
if (IS_ERR(genpd))
@ -281,45 +330,11 @@ int dev_pm_genpd_set_performance_state(struct device *dev, unsigned int state)
prev = gpd_data->performance_state;
gpd_data->performance_state = state;
/* New requested state is same as Max requested state */
if (state == genpd->performance_state)
goto unlock;
/* New requested state is higher than Max requested state */
if (state > genpd->performance_state)
goto update_state;
/* Traverse all devices within the domain */
list_for_each_entry(pdd, &genpd->dev_list, list_node) {
pd_data = to_gpd_data(pdd);
if (pd_data->performance_state > state)
state = pd_data->performance_state;
}
if (state == genpd->performance_state)
goto unlock;
/*
* We aren't propagating performance state changes of a subdomain to its
* masters as we don't have hardware that needs it. Over that, the
* performance states of subdomain and its masters may not have
* one-to-one mapping and would require additional information. We can
* get back to this once we have hardware that needs it. For that
* reason, we don't have to consider performance state of the subdomains
* of genpd here.
*/
update_state:
ret = genpd->set_performance_state(genpd, state);
if (ret) {
state = _genpd_reeval_performance_state(genpd, state);
ret = _genpd_set_performance_state(genpd, state);
if (ret)
gpd_data->performance_state = prev;
goto unlock;
}
genpd->performance_state = state;
unlock:
genpd_unlock(genpd);
return ret;