PM / Domains: Factorize dev_pm_genpd_set_performance_state()
Separate out _genpd_set_performance_state() and _genpd_reeval_performance_state() from dev_pm_genpd_set_performance_state() to handle performance state update related stuff. This will be used by a later commit. Tested-by: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org> Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
1067ae3e42
commit
cd50c6d3eb
|
@ -239,6 +239,56 @@ static void genpd_update_accounting(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
|
|||
static inline void genpd_update_accounting(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd) {}
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
static int _genpd_reeval_performance_state(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd,
|
||||
unsigned int state)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct generic_pm_domain_data *pd_data;
|
||||
struct pm_domain_data *pdd;
|
||||
|
||||
/* New requested state is same as Max requested state */
|
||||
if (state == genpd->performance_state)
|
||||
return state;
|
||||
|
||||
/* New requested state is higher than Max requested state */
|
||||
if (state > genpd->performance_state)
|
||||
return state;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Traverse all devices within the domain */
|
||||
list_for_each_entry(pdd, &genpd->dev_list, list_node) {
|
||||
pd_data = to_gpd_data(pdd);
|
||||
|
||||
if (pd_data->performance_state > state)
|
||||
state = pd_data->performance_state;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We aren't propagating performance state changes of a subdomain to its
|
||||
* masters as we don't have hardware that needs it. Over that, the
|
||||
* performance states of subdomain and its masters may not have
|
||||
* one-to-one mapping and would require additional information. We can
|
||||
* get back to this once we have hardware that needs it. For that
|
||||
* reason, we don't have to consider performance state of the subdomains
|
||||
* of genpd here.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
return state;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int _genpd_set_performance_state(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd,
|
||||
unsigned int state)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
|
||||
if (state == genpd->performance_state)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
ret = genpd->set_performance_state(genpd, state);
|
||||
if (ret)
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
|
||||
genpd->performance_state = state;
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* dev_pm_genpd_set_performance_state- Set performance state of device's power
|
||||
* domain.
|
||||
|
@ -257,10 +307,9 @@ static inline void genpd_update_accounting(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd) {}
|
|||
int dev_pm_genpd_set_performance_state(struct device *dev, unsigned int state)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct generic_pm_domain *genpd;
|
||||
struct generic_pm_domain_data *gpd_data, *pd_data;
|
||||
struct pm_domain_data *pdd;
|
||||
struct generic_pm_domain_data *gpd_data;
|
||||
unsigned int prev;
|
||||
int ret = 0;
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
|
||||
genpd = dev_to_genpd(dev);
|
||||
if (IS_ERR(genpd))
|
||||
|
@ -281,45 +330,11 @@ int dev_pm_genpd_set_performance_state(struct device *dev, unsigned int state)
|
|||
prev = gpd_data->performance_state;
|
||||
gpd_data->performance_state = state;
|
||||
|
||||
/* New requested state is same as Max requested state */
|
||||
if (state == genpd->performance_state)
|
||||
goto unlock;
|
||||
|
||||
/* New requested state is higher than Max requested state */
|
||||
if (state > genpd->performance_state)
|
||||
goto update_state;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Traverse all devices within the domain */
|
||||
list_for_each_entry(pdd, &genpd->dev_list, list_node) {
|
||||
pd_data = to_gpd_data(pdd);
|
||||
|
||||
if (pd_data->performance_state > state)
|
||||
state = pd_data->performance_state;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (state == genpd->performance_state)
|
||||
goto unlock;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We aren't propagating performance state changes of a subdomain to its
|
||||
* masters as we don't have hardware that needs it. Over that, the
|
||||
* performance states of subdomain and its masters may not have
|
||||
* one-to-one mapping and would require additional information. We can
|
||||
* get back to this once we have hardware that needs it. For that
|
||||
* reason, we don't have to consider performance state of the subdomains
|
||||
* of genpd here.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
update_state:
|
||||
ret = genpd->set_performance_state(genpd, state);
|
||||
if (ret) {
|
||||
state = _genpd_reeval_performance_state(genpd, state);
|
||||
ret = _genpd_set_performance_state(genpd, state);
|
||||
if (ret)
|
||||
gpd_data->performance_state = prev;
|
||||
goto unlock;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
genpd->performance_state = state;
|
||||
|
||||
unlock:
|
||||
genpd_unlock(genpd);
|
||||
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue