[media] pwc: Fix comment wrt lock ordering
With all the changes to handle the locking in the v4l2-core rather then at the driver level, the order in which the 2 pwc locks need to be taken has changed, update the comment in the header file to correctly reflect this. Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
df90e22589
commit
cd5de26288
|
@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ struct pwc_device
|
||||||
struct list_head queued_bufs;
|
struct list_head queued_bufs;
|
||||||
spinlock_t queued_bufs_lock; /* Protects queued_bufs */
|
spinlock_t queued_bufs_lock; /* Protects queued_bufs */
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/* Note if taking both locks v4l2_lock must always be locked first! */
|
/* If taking both locks vb_queue_lock must always be locked first! */
|
||||||
struct mutex v4l2_lock; /* Protects everything else */
|
struct mutex v4l2_lock; /* Protects everything else */
|
||||||
struct mutex vb_queue_lock; /* Protects vb_queue and capt_file */
|
struct mutex vb_queue_lock; /* Protects vb_queue and capt_file */
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue