p71924506
/
linux_old1
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity

ARC: [SMP] optimize IPI send and receive 

* Don't send an IPI if receiver already has a pending IPI.
  Atomically piggyback the new msg with pending msg.

* IPI receiver looping on xchg() not required

References: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/25/232
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
This commit is contained in:
Vineet Gupta 2013-11-28 13:57:54 +05:30
parent f2a4aa5646
commit d8e8c7dda1
1 changed files with 40 additions and 28 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

68
arch/arc/kernel/smp.c
View File

@ -215,16 +215,31 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, ipi_data);
static void ipi_send_msg_one(int cpu, enum ipi_msg_type msg)
{
unsigned long __percpu *ipi_data_ptr = per_cpu_ptr(&ipi_data, cpu);
unsigned long old, new;
unsigned long flags;
pr_debug("%d Sending msg [%d] to %d\n", smp_processor_id(), msg, cpu);
local_irq_save(flags);
set_bit(msg, ipi_data_ptr);
/*
* Atomically write new msg bit (in case others are writing too),
* and read back old value
*/
do {
new = old = *ipi_data_ptr;
new |= 1U << msg;
} while (cmpxchg(ipi_data_ptr, old, new) != old);
/* Call the platform specific cross-CPU call function */
if (plat_smp_ops.ipi_send)
/*
* Call the platform specific IPI kick function, but avoid if possible:
* Only do so if there's no pending msg from other concurrent sender(s).
* Otherwise, recevier will see this msg as well when it takes the
* IPI corresponding to that msg. This is true, even if it is already in
* IPI handler, because !@old means it has not yet dequeued the msg(s)
* so @new msg can be a free-loader
*/
if (plat_smp_ops.ipi_send && !old)
plat_smp_ops.ipi_send(cpu);
local_irq_restore(flags);
@ -269,31 +284,23 @@ static void ipi_cpu_stop(void)
machine_halt();
}
static inline void __do_IPI(unsigned long pending)
static inline void __do_IPI(unsigned long msg)
{
while (pending) {
switch (msg) {
case IPI_RESCHEDULE:
scheduler_ipi();
break;
unsigned long msg = __ffs(pending);
case IPI_CALL_FUNC:
generic_smp_call_function_interrupt();
break;
switch (msg) {
case IPI_RESCHEDULE:
scheduler_ipi();
break;
case IPI_CPU_STOP:
ipi_cpu_stop();
break;
case IPI_CALL_FUNC:
generic_smp_call_function_interrupt();
break;
case IPI_CPU_STOP:
ipi_cpu_stop();
break;
default:
pr_warn("IPI missing msg\n");
}
pending &= ~(1U << msg);
default:
pr_warn("IPI with unexpected msg %ld\n", msg);
}
}
@ -312,11 +319,16 @@ irqreturn_t do_IPI(int irq, void *dev_id)
plat_smp_ops.ipi_clear(irq);
/*
* XXX: is this loop really needed
* And do we need to move ipi_clean inside
* "dequeue" the msg corresponding to this IPI (and possibly other
* piggybacked msg from elided IPIs: see ipi_send_msg_one() above)
*/
while ((pending = xchg(this_cpu_ptr(&ipi_data), 0)) != 0)
__do_IPI(pending);
pending = xchg(this_cpu_ptr(&ipi_data), 0);
do {
unsigned long msg = __ffs(pending);
__do_IPI(msg);
pending &= ~(1U << msg);
} while (pending);
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}