security/device_cgroup: Fix RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN() condition
f78f5b90c4
("rcu: Rename rcu_lockdep_assert() to RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN()")
introduced a bug by incorrectly inverting the condition when moving from
rcu_lockdep_assert() to RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(). This commit therefore fixes
the inversion.
Reported-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
Reported-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@canonical.com>
Tested-by: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@fedoraproject.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
12d560f4ea
commit
dc3a04d551
|
@ -401,7 +401,7 @@ static bool verify_new_ex(struct dev_cgroup *dev_cgroup,
|
||||||
bool match = false;
|
bool match = false;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_read_lock_held() &&
|
RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_read_lock_held() &&
|
||||||
lockdep_is_held(&devcgroup_mutex),
|
!lockdep_is_held(&devcgroup_mutex),
|
||||||
"device_cgroup:verify_new_ex called without proper synchronization");
|
"device_cgroup:verify_new_ex called without proper synchronization");
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (dev_cgroup->behavior == DEVCG_DEFAULT_ALLOW) {
|
if (dev_cgroup->behavior == DEVCG_DEFAULT_ALLOW) {
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue