selftests/bpf: add a test for a pruning bug in the verifier
The test makes a read through a map value pointer, then considers pruning a branch where the register holds an adjusted map value pointer. It should not prune, but currently it does. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> [ecree@solarflare.com: added test-name and patch description] Signed-off-by: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
63f45f8406
commit
df20cb7ec1
|
@ -6503,6 +6503,34 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
|||
.result = REJECT,
|
||||
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_IN,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"varlen_map_value_access pruning",
|
||||
.insns = {
|
||||
BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
|
||||
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
|
||||
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
|
||||
BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
|
||||
BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0,
|
||||
BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
|
||||
BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 8),
|
||||
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, 0),
|
||||
BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_2, MAX_ENTRIES),
|
||||
BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, 1),
|
||||
BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0),
|
||||
BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_LSH, BPF_REG_1, 2),
|
||||
BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
|
||||
BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JA, 0, 0, 0),
|
||||
BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, 0,
|
||||
offsetof(struct test_val, foo)),
|
||||
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
.fixup_map2 = { 3 },
|
||||
.errstr_unpriv = "R0 leaks addr",
|
||||
.errstr = "R0 unbounded memory access",
|
||||
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
|
||||
.result = REJECT,
|
||||
.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
|
||||
},
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
static int probe_filter_length(const struct bpf_insn *fp)
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue