ARM: 8160/1: drop warning about return_address not using unwind tables
The warning was introduced in 2009 (commit 4bf1fa5a34
([ARM] 5613/1:
implement CALLER_ADDRESSx)). The only "problem" here is that
CALLER_ADDRESSx for x > 1 returns NULL which doesn't do much harm.
The drawback of implementing a fix (i.e. use unwind tables to implement CALLER_ADDRESSx) is that much of the unwinder code would need to be marked as not
traceable.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
This commit is contained in:
parent
c3c963e1fb
commit
e16343c47e
|
@ -59,10 +59,6 @@ void *return_address(unsigned int level)
|
|||
|
||||
#else /* if defined(CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER) && !defined(CONFIG_ARM_UNWIND) */
|
||||
|
||||
#if defined(CONFIG_ARM_UNWIND)
|
||||
#warning "TODO: return_address should use unwind tables"
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#endif /* if defined(CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER) && !defined(CONFIG_ARM_UNWIND) / else */
|
||||
|
||||
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(return_address);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue