orinoco: fix checking for default value
Thresholds uses -1 to indicate that default value should be used. Since thresholds are unsigned sign checking makes no sense. The problem has been detected using proposed semantic patch scripts/coccinelle/tests/unsigned_lesser_than_zero.cocci [1]. [1]: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2038576 Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
cc75149859
commit
e79dd09b60
|
@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ static int orinoco_set_wiphy_params(struct wiphy *wiphy, u32 changed)
|
|||
if (changed & WIPHY_PARAM_FRAG_THRESHOLD) {
|
||||
/* Set fragmentation */
|
||||
if (priv->has_mwo) {
|
||||
if (wiphy->frag_threshold < 0)
|
||||
if (wiphy->frag_threshold == -1)
|
||||
frag_value = 0;
|
||||
else {
|
||||
printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: Fixed fragmentation "
|
||||
|
@ -230,7 +230,7 @@ static int orinoco_set_wiphy_params(struct wiphy *wiphy, u32 changed)
|
|||
frag_value = 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
if (wiphy->frag_threshold < 0)
|
||||
if (wiphy->frag_threshold == -1)
|
||||
frag_value = 2346;
|
||||
else if ((wiphy->frag_threshold < 257) ||
|
||||
(wiphy->frag_threshold > 2347))
|
||||
|
@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ static int orinoco_set_wiphy_params(struct wiphy *wiphy, u32 changed)
|
|||
* the upper limit.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
if (wiphy->rts_threshold < 0)
|
||||
if (wiphy->rts_threshold == -1)
|
||||
rts_value = 2347;
|
||||
else if (wiphy->rts_threshold > 2347)
|
||||
err = -EINVAL;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue