orinoco: fix checking for default value

Thresholds uses -1 to indicate that default value should be used.
Since thresholds are unsigned sign checking makes no sense.

The problem has been detected using proposed semantic patch
scripts/coccinelle/tests/unsigned_lesser_than_zero.cocci [1].

[1]: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2038576

Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
Andrzej Hajda 2015-09-21 15:33:54 +02:00 committed by David S. Miller
parent cc75149859
commit e79dd09b60
1 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions

View File

@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ static int orinoco_set_wiphy_params(struct wiphy *wiphy, u32 changed)
if (changed & WIPHY_PARAM_FRAG_THRESHOLD) {
/* Set fragmentation */
if (priv->has_mwo) {
if (wiphy->frag_threshold < 0)
if (wiphy->frag_threshold == -1)
frag_value = 0;
else {
printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: Fixed fragmentation "
@ -230,7 +230,7 @@ static int orinoco_set_wiphy_params(struct wiphy *wiphy, u32 changed)
frag_value = 1;
}
} else {
if (wiphy->frag_threshold < 0)
if (wiphy->frag_threshold == -1)
frag_value = 2346;
else if ((wiphy->frag_threshold < 257) ||
(wiphy->frag_threshold > 2347))
@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ static int orinoco_set_wiphy_params(struct wiphy *wiphy, u32 changed)
* the upper limit.
*/
if (wiphy->rts_threshold < 0)
if (wiphy->rts_threshold == -1)
rts_value = 2347;
else if (wiphy->rts_threshold > 2347)
err = -EINVAL;