lib/test_printf.c: test precision quirks
The kernel's printf doesn't follow the standards in a few corner cases (which are probably mostly irrelevant). Add tests that document the current behaviour. Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Maurizio Lombardi <mlombard@redhat.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
331e4deb6d
commit
f176eb4ce9
|
@ -166,14 +166,23 @@ test_string(void)
|
|||
test("", "%s%.0s", "", "123");
|
||||
test("ABCD|abc|123", "%s|%.3s|%.*s", "ABCD", "abcdef", 3, "123456");
|
||||
test("1 | 2|3 | 4|5 ", "%-3s|%3s|%-*s|%*s|%*s", "1", "2", 3, "3", 3, "4", -3, "5");
|
||||
test("1234 ", "%-10.4s", "123456");
|
||||
test(" 1234", "%10.4s", "123456");
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* POSIX and C99 say that a missing precision should be
|
||||
* treated as a precision of 0. However, the kernel's printf
|
||||
* implementation treats this case as if the . wasn't
|
||||
* present. Let's add a test case documenting the current
|
||||
* behaviour; should anyone ever feel the need to follow the
|
||||
* standards more closely, this can be revisited.
|
||||
* POSIX and C99 say that a negative precision (which is only
|
||||
* possible to pass via a * argument) should be treated as if
|
||||
* the precision wasn't present, and that if the precision is
|
||||
* omitted (as in %.s), the precision should be taken to be
|
||||
* 0. However, the kernel's printf behave exactly opposite,
|
||||
* treating a negative precision as 0 and treating an omitted
|
||||
* precision specifier as if no precision was given.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* These test cases document the current behaviour; should
|
||||
* anyone ever feel the need to follow the standards more
|
||||
* closely, this can be revisited.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
test(" ", "%4.*s", -5, "123456");
|
||||
test("123456", "%.s", "123456");
|
||||
test("a||", "%.s|%.0s|%.*s", "a", "b", 0, "c");
|
||||
test("a | | ", "%-3.s|%-3.0s|%-3.*s", "a", "b", 0, "c");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue