Bluetooth: mark expected switch fall-throughs
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. In this particular case, notice that I replaced the "deliberate fall-through..." comment with a "fall through" comment, which is what GCC is expecting to find. Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@embeddedor.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
2d13e34749
commit
fac72b243c
|
@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ static void bcm203x_complete(struct urb *urb)
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
data->state = BCM203X_LOAD_FIRMWARE;
|
||||
|
||||
/* fall through */
|
||||
case BCM203X_LOAD_FIRMWARE:
|
||||
if (data->fw_sent == data->fw_size) {
|
||||
usb_fill_int_urb(urb, udev, usb_rcvintpipe(udev, BCM203X_IN_EP),
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ static void ll_device_want_to_wakeup(struct hci_uart *hu)
|
|||
* perfectly safe to always send one.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
BT_DBG("dual wake-up-indication");
|
||||
/* deliberate fall-through - do not add break */
|
||||
/* fall through */
|
||||
case HCILL_ASLEEP:
|
||||
/* acknowledge device wake up */
|
||||
if (send_hcill_cmd(HCILL_WAKE_UP_ACK, hu) < 0) {
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue