The return values of btrfs_item_offset_nr and btrfs_item_size_nr are of
type u32. To avoid mixing signed and unsigned integers we should also
declare dsize and last_off to be of type u32.
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Moise <00moses.alexander00@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
btrfs_error() and btrfs_std_error() does the same thing
and calls _btrfs_std_error(), so consolidate them together.
And the main motivation is that btrfs_error() is closely
named with btrfs_err(), one handles error action the other
is to log the error, so don't closely name them.
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Suggested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
When btrfs_reloc_cow_block() failed in __btrfs_cow_block(), current
code just return a err-value to caller, but leave new_created extent
buffer exist and locked.
Then subsequent code (in relocate) try to lock above eb again,
and caused deadlock without any dmesg.
(eb lock use wait_event(), so no lockdep message)
It is hard to do recover work in __btrfs_cow_block() at this error
point, but we can abort transaction to avoid deadlock and operate on
unstable state.a
It also helps developer to find wrong place quickly.
(better than a frozen fs without any dmesg before patch)
Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
The return value of read_tree_block() can confuse callers as it always
returns NULL for either -ENOMEM or -EIO, so it's likely that callers
parse it to a wrong error, for instance, in btrfs_read_tree_root().
This fixes the above issue.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Convert kmalloc(nr * size, ..) to kmalloc_array that does additional
overflow checks, the zeroing variant is kcalloc.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
The end_slot variable actually matches the number of pointers in the
node and not the last slot (which is 'nritems - 1'). Therefore in order
to check that the current slot in the for loop doesn't match the last
one, the correct logic is to check if 'i' is less than 'end_slot - 1'
and not 'end_slot - 2'.
Fix this and set end_slot to be 'nritems - 1', as it's less confusing
since the variable name implies it's inclusive rather then exclusive.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
This is the 3rd independent patch of a larger project to cleanup btrfs's
internal usage of btrfs_root. Many functions take btrfs_root only to
grab the fs_info struct.
By requiring a root these functions cause programmer overhead. That
these functions can accept any valid root is not obvious until
inspection.
This patch reduces the specificity of such functions to accept the
fs_info directly.
These patches can be applied independently and thus are not being
submitted as a patch series. There should be about 26 patches by the
project's completion. Each patch will cleanup between 1 and 34 functions
apiece. Each patch covers a single file's functions.
This patch affects the following function(s):
1) csum_tree_block
2) csum_dirty_buffer
3) check_tree_block_fsid
4) btrfs_find_tree_block
5) clean_tree_block
Signed-off-by: Daniel Dressler <danieru.dressler@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
This patch is part of a larger project to cleanup btrfs's internal usage
of struct btrfs_root. Many functions take btrfs_root only to grab a
pointer to fs_info.
This causes programmers to ponder which root can be passed. Since only
the fs_info is read affected functions can accept any root, except this
is only obvious upon inspection.
This patch reduces the specificty of such functions to accept the
fs_info directly.
This patch does not address the two functions in ctree.c (insert_ptr,
and split_item) which only use root for BUG_ONs in ctree.c
This patch affects the following functions:
1) fixup_low_keys
2) btrfs_set_item_key_safe
Signed-off-by: Daniel Dressler <danieru.dressler@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
btrfs_alloc_tree_block() returns an extent buffer on which a blocked lock has
been taken. Hence assign the appropriate value to path->locks[level].
Signed-off-by: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
We were incorrectly detecting when the target key didn't exist anymore
after releasing the path and re-searching the tree. This could make
us split or duplicate (btrfs_split_item() and btrfs_duplicate_item()
are its only callers at the moment) an item when we should not.
For the case of duplicating an item, we currently only duplicate
checksum items (csum tree) and file extent items (fs/subvol trees).
For the checksum items we end up overriding the item completely,
but for file extent items we update only some of their fields in
the copy (done in __btrfs_drop_extents), which means we can end up
having a logical corruption for some values.
Also for the case where we duplicate a file extent item it will make
us produce a leaf with a wrong key order, as btrfs_duplicate_item()
advances us to the next slot and then its caller sets a smaller key
on the new item at that slot (like in __btrfs_drop_extents() e.g.).
Alternatively if the tree search in setup_leaf_for_split() leaves
with path->slots[0] == btrfs_header_nritems(path->nodes[0]), we end
up accessing beyond the leaf's end (when we check if the item's size
has changed) and make our caller insert an item at the invalid slot
btrfs_header_nritems(path->nodes[0]) + 1, causing an invalid memory
access if the leaf is full or nearly full.
This issue has been present since the introduction of this function
in 2009:
Btrfs: Add btrfs_duplicate_item
commit ad48fd7546
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
I've been overloading root->dirty_list to keep track of dirty roots and which
roots need to have their commit roots switched at transaction commit time. This
could cause us to lose an update to the root which could corrupt the file
system. To fix this use a state bit to know if the root is dirty, and if it
isn't set we go ahead and move the root to the dirty list. This way if we
re-dirty the root after adding it to the switch_commit list we make sure to
update it. This also makes it so that the extent root is always the last root
on the dirty list to try and keep the amount of churn down at this point in the
commit. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
If the found_key is NULL, then btrfs_find_item becomes a verbose wrapper
for simple btrfs_search_slot.
After we've removed all such callers, passing a NULL key is not valid
anymore.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
If btrfs_find_item is called with NULL path it allocates one locally but
does not free it. Affected paths are inserting an orphan item for a file
and for a subvol root.
Move the path allocation to the callers.
CC: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.14+
Fixes: 3f870c2899 ("btrfs: expand btrfs_find_item() to include find_orphan_item functionality")
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Make the extent buffer allocation interface consistent. Cloned eb will
set a valid fs_info. For dummy eb, we can drop the length parameter and
set it from fs_info.
The built-in sanity checks may pass a NULL fs_info that's queried for
nodesize, but we know it's 4096.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Replacing a xattr consists of doing a lookup for its existing value, delete
the current value from the respective leaf, release the search path and then
finally insert the new value. This leaves a time window where readers (getxattr,
listxattrs) won't see any value for the xattr. Xattrs are used to store ACLs,
so this has security implications.
This change also fixes 2 other existing issues which were:
*) Deleting the old xattr value without verifying first if the new xattr will
fit in the existing leaf item (in case multiple xattrs are packed in the
same item due to name hash collision);
*) Returning -EEXIST when the flag XATTR_CREATE is given and the xattr doesn't
exist but we have have an existing item that packs muliple xattrs with
the same name hash as the input xattr. In this case we should return ENOSPC.
A test case for xfstests follows soon.
Thanks to Alexandre Oliva for reporting the non-atomicity of the xattr replace
implementation.
Reported-by: Alexandre Oliva <oliva@gnu.org>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
The fair reader/writer locks mean that btrfs_clear_path_blocking needs
to strictly follow lock ordering rules even when we already have
blocking locks on a given path.
Before we can clear a blocking lock on the path, we need to make sure
all of the locks have been converted to blocking. This will remove lock
inversions against anyone spinning in write_lock() against the buffers
we're trying to get read locks on. These inversions didn't exist before
the fair read/writer locks, but now we need to be more careful.
We papered over this deadlock in the past by changing
btrfs_try_read_lock() to be a true trylock against both the spinlock and
the blocking lock. This was slower, and not sufficient to fix all the
deadlocks. This patch adds a btrfs_tree_read_lock_atomic(), which
basically means get the spinlock but trylock on the blocking lock.
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Reported-by: Patrick Schmid <schmid@phys.ethz.ch>
cc: stable@vger.kernel.org #v3.15+
cmp was declared twice in btrfs_compare_trees resulting in a shadow
warning. This patch renames second internal variable.
Signed-off-by: Fabian Frederick <fabf@skynet.be>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Use a common definition for the inline data start so we don't have to
open-code it and introduce bugs like "Btrfs: fix wrong max inline data
size limit" fixed.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Rename to btrfs_alloc_tree_block as it fits to the alloc/find/free +
_tree_block family. The parameter blocksize was set to the metadata
block size, directly or indirectly.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
The parent_transid parameter has been unused since its introduction in
ca7a79ad8d ("Pass down the expected generation number when reading
tree blocks"). In reada_tree_block, it was even wrongly set to leafsize.
Transid check is done in the proper read and readahead ignores errors.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
None of the uses of btrfs_search_forward() need to have the path
nodes (level >= 1) read locked, only the leaf needs to be locked
while the caller processes it. Therefore make it return a path
with all nodes unlocked, except for the leaf.
This change is motivated by the observation that during a file
fsync we repeatdly call btrfs_search_forward() and process the
returned leaf while upper nodes of the returned path (level >= 1)
are read locked, which unnecessarily blocks other tasks that want
to write to the same fs/subvol btree.
Therefore instead of modifying the fsync code to unlock all nodes
with level >= 1 immediately after calling btrfs_search_forward(),
change btrfs_search_forward() to do it, so that it benefits all
callers.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
If we need to cow a node, increase the write lock level and retry the
tree search, there's no point of changing the node locks in our path
to blocking mode, as we only waste time and unnecessarily wake up other
tasks waiting on the spinning locks (just to block them again shortly
after) because we release our path before repeating the tree search.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
In ctree.c:setup_items_for_insert(), we can unlock all nodes in our
path before we process the leaf (shift items and data, adjust data
offsets, etc). This allows for better btree concurrency, as we're
often holding a write lock on at least the node at level 1.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
The nodesize and leafsize were never of different values. Unify the
usage and make nodesize the one. Cleanup the redundant checks and
helpers.
Shaves a few bytes from .text:
text data bss dec hex filename
852418 24560 23112 900090 dbbfa btrfs.ko.before
851074 24584 23112 898770 db6d2 btrfs.ko.after
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Before I extended the no_quota arg to btrfs_dec/inc_ref because I didn't
understand how snapshot delete was using it and assumed that we needed the
quota operations there. With Mark's work this has turned out to be not the
case, we _always_ need to use no_quota for btrfs_dec/inc_ref, so just drop the
argument and make __btrfs_mod_ref call it's process function with no_quota set
always. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Several reports about leaf corruption has been floating on the list, one of them
points to __btrfs_drop_extents(), and we find that the leaf becomes corrupted
after __btrfs_drop_extents(), it's really a rare case but it does exist.
The problem turns out to be btrfs_next_leaf() called in __btrfs_drop_extents().
So in btrfs_next_leaf(), we release the current path to re-search the last key of
the leaf for locating next leaf, and we've taken it into account that there might
be balance operations between leafs during this 'unlock and re-lock' dance, so
we check the path again and advance it if there are now more items available.
But things are a bit different if that last key happens to be removed and balance
gets a bigger key as the last one, and btrfs_search_slot will return it with
ret > 0, IOW, nothing change in this leaf except the new last key, then we think
we're okay because there is no more item balanced in, fine, we thinks we can
go to the next leaf.
However, we should return that bigger key, otherwise we deserve leaf corruption,
for example, in endio, skipping that key means that __btrfs_drop_extents() thinks
it has dropped all extent matched the required range and finish_ordered_io can
safely insert a new extent, but it actually doesn't and ends up a leaf
corruption.
One may be asking that why our locking on extent io tree doesn't work as
expected, ie. it should avoid this kind of race situation. But in
__btrfs_drop_extents(), we don't always find extents which are included within
our locking range, IOW, extents can start before our searching start, in this
case locking on extent io tree doesn't protect us from the race.
This takes the special case into account.
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
We might have had an item with the previous key in the tree right
before we released our path. And after we released our path, that
item might have been pushed to the first slot (0) of the leaf we
were holding due to a tree balance. Alternatively, an item with the
previous key can exist as the only element of a leaf (big fat item).
Therefore account for these 2 cases, so that our callers (like
btrfs_previous_item) don't miss an existing item with a key matching
the previous key we computed above.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
This exercises the various parts of the new qgroup accounting code. We do some
basic stuff and do some things with the shared refs to make sure all that code
works. I had to add a bunch of infrastructure because I needed to be able to
insert items into a fake tree without having to do all the hard work myself,
hopefully this will be usefull in the future. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Currently qgroups account for space by intercepting delayed ref updates to fs
trees. It does this by adding sequence numbers to delayed ref updates so that
it can figure out how the tree looked before the update so we can adjust the
counters properly. The problem with this is that it does not allow delayed refs
to be merged, so if you say are defragging an extent with 5k snapshots pointing
to it we will thrash the delayed ref lock because we need to go back and
manually merge these things together. Instead we want to process quota changes
when we know they are going to happen, like when we first allocate an extent, we
free a reference for an extent, we add new references etc. This patch
accomplishes this by only adding qgroup operations for real ref changes. We
only modify the sequence number when we need to lookup roots for bytenrs, this
reduces the amount of churn on the sequence number and allows us to merge
delayed refs as we add them most of the time. This patch encompasses a bunch of
architectural changes
1) qgroup ref operations: instead of tracking qgroup operations through the
delayed refs we simply add new ref operations whenever we notice that we need to
when we've modified the refs themselves.
2) tree mod seq: we no longer have this separation of major/minor counters.
this makes the sequence number stuff much more sane and we can remove some
locking that was needed to protect the counter.
3) delayed ref seq: we now read the tree mod seq number and use that as our
sequence. This means each new delayed ref doesn't have it's own unique sequence
number, rather whenever we go to lookup backrefs we inc the sequence number so
we can make sure to keep any new operations from screwing up our world view at
that given point. This allows us to merge delayed refs during runtime.
With all of these changes the delayed ref stuff is a little saner and the qgroup
accounting stuff no longer goes negative in some cases like it was before.
Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
We currently rely too heavily on roots being read-only to save us from just
accessing root->commit_root. We can easily balance blocks out from underneath a
read only root, so to save us from getting screwed make sure we only access
root->commit_root under the commit root sem. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Lets try this again. We can deadlock the box if we send on a box and try to
write onto the same fs with the app that is trying to listen to the send pipe.
This is because the writer could get stuck waiting for a transaction commit
which is being blocked by the send. So fix this by making sure looking at the
commit roots is always going to be consistent. We do this by keeping track of
which roots need to have their commit roots swapped during commit, and then
taking the commit_root_sem and swapping them all at once. Then make sure we
take a read lock on the commit_root_sem in cases where we search the commit root
to make sure we're always looking at a consistent view of the commit roots.
Previously we had problems with this because we would swap a fs tree commit root
and then swap the extent tree commit root independently which would cause the
backref walking code to screw up sometimes. With this patch we no longer
deadlock and pass all the weird send/receive corner cases. Thanks,
Reportedy-by: Hugo Mills <hugo@carfax.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Just comparing the pointers (logical disk addresses) of the btree nodes is
not completely bullet proof, we have to check if their generation numbers
match too.
It is guaranteed that a COW operation will result in a block with a different
logical disk address than the original block's address, but over time we can
reuse that former logical disk address.
For example, creating a 2Gb filesystem on a loop device, and having a script
running in a loop always updating the access timestamp of a file, resulted in
the same logical disk address being reused for the same fs btree block in about
only 4 minutes.
This could make us skip entire subtrees when doing an incremental send (which
is currently the only user of btrfs_compare_trees). However the odds of getting
2 blocks at the same tree level, with the same logical disk address, equal first
slot keys and different generations, should hopefully be very low.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
If the current path's leaf slot is 0, we do search for the previous
leaf (via btrfs_prev_leaf) and set the new path's leaf slot to a
value corresponding to the number of items - 1 of the former leaf.
Fix this by using the slot set by btrfs_prev_leaf, decrementing it
by 1 if it's equal to the leaf's number of items.
Use of btrfs_search_slot_for_read() for backward iteration is used in
particular by the send feature, which could miss items when the input
leaf has less items than its previous leaf.
This could be reproduced by running btrfs/007 from xfstests in a loop.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
There is a bug that using btrfs_previous_item() to search metadata extent item.
This is because in btrfs_previous_item(), we need type match, however, since
skinny metada was introduced by josef, we may mix this two types. So just
use btrfs_previous_item() is not working right.
To keep btrfs_previous_item() like normal tree search, i introduce another
function btrfs_previous_extent_item().
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
If we do a btree search with the goal of updating an existing item
without changing its size (ins_len == 0 and cow == 1), then we never
need to hold locks on upper level nodes (even when slot == 0) after we
COW their child nodes/leaves, as we won't have node splits or merges
in this scenario (that is, no key additions, removals or shifts on any
nodes or leaves).
Therefore release the locks immediately after COWing the child nodes/leaves
while navigating the btree, even if their parent slot is 0, instead of
returning a path to the caller with those nodes locked, which would get
released only when the caller releases or frees the path (or if it calls
btrfs_unlock_up_safe).
This is a common scenario, for example when updating inode items in fs
trees and block group items in the extent tree.
The following benchmarks were performed on a quad core machine with 32Gb
of ram, using a leaf/node size of 4Kb (to generate deeper fs trees more
quickly).
sysbench --test=fileio --file-num=131072 --file-total-size=8G \
--file-test-mode=seqwr --num-threads=512 --file-block-size=8192 \
--max-requests=100000 --file-io-mode=sync [prepare|run]
Before this change: 49.85Mb/s (average of 5 runs)
After this change: 50.38Mb/s (average of 5 runs)
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Convert all applicable cases of printk and pr_* to the btrfs_* macros.
Fix all uses of the BTRFS prefix.
Signed-off-by: Frank Holton <fholton@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
While running the test btrfs/004 from xfstests in a loop, it failed
about 1 time out of 20 runs in my desktop. The failure happened in
the backref walking part of the test, and the test's error message was
like this:
btrfs/004 93s ... [failed, exit status 1] - output mismatch (see /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests_2/results//btrfs/004.out.bad)
--- tests/btrfs/004.out 2013-11-26 18:25:29.263333714 +0000
+++ /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests_2/results//btrfs/004.out.bad 2013-12-10 15:25:10.327518516 +0000
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
QA output created by 004
*** test backref walking
-*** done
+unexpected output from
+ /home/fdmanana/git/hub/btrfs-progs/btrfs inspect-internal logical-resolve -P 141512704 /home/fdmanana/btrfs-tests/scratch_1
+expected inum: 405, expected address: 454656, file: /home/fdmanana/btrfs-tests/scratch_1/snap1/p0/d6/d3d/d156/fce, got:
+
...
(Run 'diff -u tests/btrfs/004.out /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests_2/results//btrfs/004.out.bad' to see the entire diff)
Ran: btrfs/004
Failures: btrfs/004
Failed 1 of 1 tests
But immediately after the test finished, the btrfs inspect-internal command
returned the expected output:
$ btrfs inspect-internal logical-resolve -P 141512704 /home/fdmanana/btrfs-tests/scratch_1
inode 405 offset 454656 root 258
inode 405 offset 454656 root 5
It turned out this was because the btrfs_search_old_slot() calls performed
during backref walking (backref.c:__resolve_indirect_ref) were not finding
anything. The reason for this turned out to be that the tree mod logging
code was not logging some node multi-step operations atomically, therefore
btrfs_search_old_slot() callers iterated often over an incomplete tree that
wasn't fully consistent with any tree state from the past. Besides missing
items, this often (but not always) resulted in -EIO errors during old slot
searches, reported in dmesg like this:
[ 4299.933936] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 4299.933949] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 23190 at fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1343 btrfs_search_old_slot+0x57b/0xab0 [btrfs]()
[ 4299.933950] Modules linked in: btrfs raid6_pq xor pci_stub vboxpci(O) vboxnetadp(O) vboxnetflt(O) vboxdrv(O) bnep rfcomm bluetooth parport_pc ppdev binfmt_misc joydev snd_hda_codec_h
[ 4299.933977] CPU: 0 PID: 23190 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G W O 3.12.0-fdm-btrfs-next-16+ #70
[ 4299.933978] Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./Z77 Pro4, BIOS P1.50 09/04/2012
[ 4299.933979] 000000000000053f ffff8806f3fd98f8 ffffffff8176d284 0000000000000007
[ 4299.933982] 0000000000000000 ffff8806f3fd9938 ffffffff8104a81c ffff880659c64b70
[ 4299.933984] ffff880659c643d0 ffff8806599233d8 ffff880701e2e938 0000160000000000
[ 4299.933987] Call Trace:
[ 4299.933991] [<ffffffff8176d284>] dump_stack+0x55/0x76
[ 4299.933994] [<ffffffff8104a81c>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0
[ 4299.933997] [<ffffffff8104a86a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20
[ 4299.934003] [<ffffffffa065d3bb>] btrfs_search_old_slot+0x57b/0xab0 [btrfs]
[ 4299.934005] [<ffffffff81775f3b>] ? _raw_read_unlock+0x2b/0x50
[ 4299.934010] [<ffffffffa0655001>] ? __tree_mod_log_search+0x81/0xc0 [btrfs]
[ 4299.934019] [<ffffffffa06dd9b0>] __resolve_indirect_refs+0x130/0x5f0 [btrfs]
[ 4299.934027] [<ffffffffa06a21f1>] ? free_extent_buffer+0x61/0xc0 [btrfs]
[ 4299.934034] [<ffffffffa06de39c>] find_parent_nodes+0x1fc/0xe40 [btrfs]
[ 4299.934042] [<ffffffffa06b13e0>] ? defrag_lookup_extent+0xe0/0xe0 [btrfs]
[ 4299.934048] [<ffffffffa06b13e0>] ? defrag_lookup_extent+0xe0/0xe0 [btrfs]
[ 4299.934056] [<ffffffffa06df980>] iterate_extent_inodes+0xe0/0x250 [btrfs]
[ 4299.934058] [<ffffffff817762db>] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x2b/0x50
[ 4299.934065] [<ffffffffa06dfb82>] iterate_inodes_from_logical+0x92/0xb0 [btrfs]
[ 4299.934071] [<ffffffffa06b13e0>] ? defrag_lookup_extent+0xe0/0xe0 [btrfs]
[ 4299.934078] [<ffffffffa06b7015>] btrfs_ioctl+0xf65/0x1f60 [btrfs]
[ 4299.934080] [<ffffffff811658b8>] ? handle_mm_fault+0x278/0xb00
[ 4299.934083] [<ffffffff81075563>] ? up_read+0x23/0x40
[ 4299.934085] [<ffffffff8177a41c>] ? __do_page_fault+0x20c/0x5a0
[ 4299.934088] [<ffffffff811b2946>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x96/0x570
[ 4299.934090] [<ffffffff81776e23>] ? error_sti+0x5/0x6
[ 4299.934093] [<ffffffff810b71e8>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x28/0xd0
[ 4299.934096] [<ffffffff81776a09>] ? retint_swapgs+0xe/0x13
[ 4299.934098] [<ffffffff811b2eb1>] SyS_ioctl+0x91/0xb0
[ 4299.934100] [<ffffffff813eecde>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3f
[ 4299.934102] [<ffffffff8177ef12>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[ 4299.934102] [<ffffffff8177ef12>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[ 4299.934104] ---[ end trace 48f0cfc902491414 ]---
[ 4299.934378] btrfs bad fsid on block 0
These tree mod log operations that must be performed atomically, tree_mod_log_free_eb,
tree_mod_log_eb_copy, tree_mod_log_insert_root and tree_mod_log_insert_move, used to
be performed atomically before the following commit:
c8cc634165
(Btrfs: stop using GFP_ATOMIC for the tree mod log allocations)
That change removed the atomicity of such operations. This patch restores the
atomicity while still not doing the GFP_ATOMIC allocations of tree_mod_elem
structures, so it has to do the allocations using GFP_NOFS before acquiring
the mod log lock.
This issue has been experienced by several users recently, such as for example:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg28574.html
After running the btrfs/004 test for 679 consecutive iterations with this
patch applied, I didn't ran into the issue anymore.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Chris Mason