Several boards use always the same pattern with pxamci :
request gpio, request irq for that gpio to detect MMC card
insertion, request gpio for read-only mode detection, etc
...
Now that pxamci provides platform_data to describe simple
gpio management of the MMC external controls, use it.
Signed-off-by: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
Acked-by: Mike Rapoport <mike@compulab.co.il>
Acked-by: Philipp Zabel <philipp.zabel@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com>
Cc: rpurdie@rpsys.net
Cc: drwyrm@gmail.com
Cc: sakoman@gmail.com
Cc: marek.vasut@gmail.com
Cc: s.hauer@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@gmail.com>
Considering the header mess ATM, it is not always possible to include
the correct header files within board code. Let's keep this simple:
<mach/pxa25x.h> - for pxa25x based platforms
<mach/pxa27x.h> - for pxa27x based platforms
<mach/pxa300.h> - for pxa300 based platforms
<mach/pxa320.h> - for pxa320 based platforms
<mach/pxa930.h> - for pxa930 based platforms
NOTE:
1. one header one board file, they are not compatible (i.e. they have
conflicting definitions which won't compile if included together).
2. Unless strictly necessary, the following header files are considered
to be SoC files use _only_, and is not recommended to be included in
board code:
<mach/hardware.h>
<mach/pxa-regs.h>
<mach/pxa2xx-regs.h>
<mach/pxa3xx-regs.h>
<mach/mfp.h>
<mach/mfp-pxa2xx.h>
<mach/mfp-pxa25x.h>
<mach/mfp-pxa27x.h>
<mach/mfp-pxa3xx.h>
<mach/mfp-pxa300.h>
<mach/mfp-pxa320.h>
<mach/mfp-pxa930.h>
Signed-off-by: Eric Miao <eric.miao@marvell.com>
This patch contains Palm Zire 72 power
management support.
Depends on #5238/1
Signed-off-by: Sergey Lapin <slapin@ossfans.org>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
This patch contains very basic support of Palm Zire 72.
Signed-off-by: Sergey Lapin <slapin@ossfans.org>
Acked-by: Eric Miao <eric.miao@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Robert Jarzmik