Update the syscall number after each PTRACE_SETREGS on ORIG_*AX.
This is needed to get the potentially altered syscall number in the
seccomp filters after RET_TRACE.
This fix four seccomp_bpf tests:
> [ RUN ] TRACE_syscall.skip_after_RET_TRACE
> seccomp_bpf.c:1560:TRACE_syscall.skip_after_RET_TRACE:Expected -1 (18446744073709551615) == syscall(39) (26)
> seccomp_bpf.c:1561:TRACE_syscall.skip_after_RET_TRACE:Expected 1 (1) == (*__errno_location ()) (22)
> [ FAIL ] TRACE_syscall.skip_after_RET_TRACE
> [ RUN ] TRACE_syscall.kill_after_RET_TRACE
> TRACE_syscall.kill_after_RET_TRACE: Test exited normally instead of by signal (code: 1)
> [ FAIL ] TRACE_syscall.kill_after_RET_TRACE
> [ RUN ] TRACE_syscall.skip_after_ptrace
> seccomp_bpf.c:1622:TRACE_syscall.skip_after_ptrace:Expected -1 (18446744073709551615) == syscall(39) (26)
> seccomp_bpf.c:1623:TRACE_syscall.skip_after_ptrace:Expected 1 (1) == (*__errno_location ()) (22)
> [ FAIL ] TRACE_syscall.skip_after_ptrace
> [ RUN ] TRACE_syscall.kill_after_ptrace
> TRACE_syscall.kill_after_ptrace: Test exited normally instead of by signal (code: 1)
> [ FAIL ] TRACE_syscall.kill_after_ptrace
Fixes: 26703c636c ("um/ptrace: run seccomp after ptrace")
Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Signed-off-by: James Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
This patch extends save_fp_registers() and restore_fp_registers() to use
PTRACE_GETREGSET and PTRACE_SETREGSET with the XSTATE note type, adding
support for new processor state extensions between context switches.
When the new ptrace requests are unavailable, it falls back to the old
PTRACE_GETFPREGS and PTRACE_SETFPREGS methods, which have been renamed to
save_i387_registers() and restore_i387_registers().
Now these functions expect *fp_regs to have the space of an _xstate struct.
Thus, this also makes ptrace in UML responde to PTRACE_GETFPREGS/_SETFPREG
requests with a user_i387_struct (thus independent from HOST_FP_SIZE), and
by calling save_i387_registers() and restore_i387_registers() instead of
the extended save_fp_registers() and restore_fp_registers() functions.
Signed-off-by: Eli Cooper <elicooper@gmx.com>
Don't include ptrace uapi stuff in arch headers, it will
pollute the kernel namespace and conflict with existing
stuff.
In this case it fixes clashes with common names like R8.
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Mickaël Salaün