Commit Graph

16 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Omar Sandoval e5313c141b loop: remove union of use_aio and ref in struct loop_cmd
When the request is completed, lo_complete_rq() checks cmd->use_aio.
However, if this is in fact an aio request, cmd->use_aio will have
already been reused as cmd->ref by lo_rw_aio*. Fix it by not using a
union. On x86_64, there's a hole after the union anyways, so this
doesn't make struct loop_cmd any bigger.

Fixes: 92d773324b ("block/loop: fix use after free")
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2017-09-25 08:56:05 -06:00
Shaohua Li bc75705d00 block/loop: remove unused field
nobody uses the list.

Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2017-09-01 13:57:35 -06:00
Shaohua Li 92d773324b block/loop: fix use after free
lo_rw_aio->call_read_iter->
1       aops->direct_IO
2       iov_iter_revert
lo_rw_aio_complete could happen between 1 and 2, the bio and bvec could
be freed before 2, which accesses bvec.

Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2017-09-01 13:57:33 -06:00
Shaohua Li 40326d8a33 block/loop: allow request merge for directio mode
Currently loop disables merge. While it makes sense for buffer IO mode,
directio mode can benefit from request merge. Without merge, loop could
send small size IO to underlayer disk and harm performance.

Reviewed-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2017-09-01 08:44:34 -06:00
Omar Sandoval 8a0740c410 loop: get rid of lo_blocksize
This is only used for setting the soft block size on the struct
block_device once and then never used again.

Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2017-08-31 13:51:10 -06:00
Omar Sandoval 1e6ec9ea89 Revert "loop: support 4k physical blocksize"
There's some stuff still up in the air, let's not get stuck with a
subpar ABI. I'll follow up with something better for 4.14.

Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2017-08-23 15:57:55 -06:00
Hannes Reinecke f2c6df7dbf loop: support 4k physical blocksize
When generating bootable VM images certain systems (most notably
s390x) require devices with 4k blocksize. This patch implements
a new flag 'LO_FLAGS_BLOCKSIZE' which will set the physical
blocksize to that of the underlying device, and allow to change
the logical blocksize for up to the physical blocksize.

Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
2017-06-08 08:40:00 -06:00
Christoph Hellwig fe2cb2905c loop: zero-fill bio on the submitting cpu
In thruth I've just audited which blk-mq drivers don't currently have a
complete callback, but I think this change is at least borderline useful.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
2017-04-20 12:16:10 -06:00
Ming Lei bc07c10a36 block: loop: support DIO & AIO
There are at least 3 advantages to use direct I/O and AIO on
read/write loop's backing file:

1) double cache can be avoided, then memory usage gets
decreased a lot

2) not like user space direct I/O, there isn't cost of
pinning pages

3) avoid context switch for obtaining good throughput
- in buffered file read, random I/O top throughput is often obtained
only if they are submitted concurrently from lots of tasks; but for
sequential I/O, most of times they can be hit from page cache, so
concurrent submissions often introduce unnecessary context switch
and can't improve throughput much. There was such discussion[1]
to use non-blocking I/O to improve the problem for application.
- with direct I/O and AIO, concurrent submissions can be
avoided and random read throughput can't be affected meantime

xfstests(-g auto, ext4) is basically passed when running with
direct I/O(aio), one exception is generic/232, but it failed in
loop buffered I/O(4.2-rc6-next-20150814) too.

Follows the fio test result for performance purpose:
	4 jobs fio test inside ext4 file system over loop block

1) How to run
	- KVM: 4 VCPUs, 2G RAM
	- linux kernel: 4.2-rc6-next-20150814(base) with the patchset
	- the loop block is over one image on SSD.
	- linux psync, 4 jobs, size 1500M, ext4 over loop block
	- test result: IOPS from fio output

2) Throughput(IOPS) becomes a bit better with direct I/O(aio)
        -------------------------------------------------------------
        test cases          |randread   |read   |randwrite  |write  |
        -------------------------------------------------------------
        base                |8015       |113811 |67442      |106978
        -------------------------------------------------------------
        base+loop aio       |8136       |125040 |67811      |111376
        -------------------------------------------------------------

- somehow, it should be caused by more page cache avaiable for
application or one extra page copy is avoided in case of direct I/O

3) context switch
        - context switch decreased by ~50% with loop direct I/O(aio)
	compared with loop buffered I/O(4.2-rc6-next-20150814)

4) memory usage from /proc/meminfo
        -------------------------------------------------------------
                                   | Buffers       | Cached
        -------------------------------------------------------------
        base                       | > 760MB       | ~950MB
        -------------------------------------------------------------
        base+loop direct I/O(aio)  | < 5MB         | ~1.6GB
        -------------------------------------------------------------

- so there are much more page caches available for application with
direct I/O

[1] https://lwn.net/Articles/612483/

Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
2015-09-23 11:01:16 -06:00
Ming Lei 2e5ab5f379 block: loop: prepare for supporing direct IO
This patches provides one interface for enabling direct IO
from user space:

	- userspace(such as losetup) can pass 'file' which is
	opened/fcntl as O_DIRECT

Also __loop_update_dio() is introduced to check if direct I/O
can be used on current loop setting.

The last big change is to introduce LO_FLAGS_DIRECT_IO flag
for userspace to know if direct IO is used to access backing
file.

Cc: linux-api@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
2015-09-23 11:01:16 -06:00
Ming Lei e03a3d7a94 block: loop: use kthread_work
The following patch will use dio/aio to submit IO to backing file,
then it needn't to schedule IO concurrently from work, so
use kthread_work for decreasing context switch cost a lot.

For non-AIO case, single thread has been used for long long time,
and it was just converted to work in v4.0, which has caused performance
regression for fedora live booting already. In discussion[1], even
though submitting I/O via work concurrently can improve random read IO
throughput, meantime it might hurt sequential read IO performance, so
better to restore to single thread behaviour.

For the following AIO support, it is better to use multi hw-queue
with per-hwq kthread than current work approach suppose there is so
high performance requirement for loop.

[1] http://marc.info/?t=143082678400002&r=1&w=2

Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
2015-09-23 11:01:16 -06:00
Ming Lei f893366795 block: loop: don't hold lo_ctl_mutex in lo_open
The lo_ctl_mutex is held for running all ioctl handlers, and
in some ioctl handlers, ioctl_by_bdev(BLKRRPART) is called for
rereading partitions, which requires bd_mutex.

So it is easy to cause failure because trylock(bd_mutex) may
fail inside blkdev_reread_part(), and follows the lock context:

blkid or other application:
	->open()
		->mutex_lock(bd_mutex)
		->lo_open()
			->mutex_lock(lo_ctl_mutex)

losetup(set fd ioctl):
	->mutex_lock(lo_ctl_mutex)
	->ioctl_by_bdev(BLKRRPART)
		->trylock(bd_mutex)

This patch trys to eliminate the ABBA lock dependency by removing
lo_ctl_mutext in lo_open() with the following approach:

1) make lo_refcnt as atomic_t and avoid acquiring lo_ctl_mutex in lo_open():
	- for open vs. add/del loop, no any problem because of loop_index_mutex
	- freeze request queue during clr_fd, so I/O can't come until
	  clearing fd is completed, like the effect of holding lo_ctl_mutex
	  in lo_open
	- both open() and release() have been serialized by bd_mutex already

2) don't hold lo_ctl_mutex for decreasing/checking lo_refcnt in
lo_release(), then lo_ctl_mutex is only required for the last release.

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Tested-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
2015-05-20 09:06:09 -06:00
Ming Lei f4aa4c7bba block: loop: convert to per-device workqueue
Documentation/workqueue.txt:
	If there is dependency among multiple work items used
	during memory reclaim, they should be queued to separate
	wq each with WQ_MEM_RECLAIM.

Loop devices can be stacked, so we have to convert to per-device
workqueue. One example is Fedora live CD.

Fixes: b5dd2f6047
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org (v4.0)
Cc: Justin M. Forbes <jforbes@fedoraproject.org>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
2015-05-05 13:46:53 -06:00
Jens Axboe 78e367a360 loop: add blk-mq.h include
Looks like we pull it in through other ways on x86, but we fail
on sparc:

In file included from drivers/block/cryptoloop.c:30:0:
drivers/block/loop.h:63:24: error: field 'tag_set' has incomplete type
struct blk_mq_tag_set tag_set;

Add the include to loop.h, kill it from loop.c.

Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
2015-01-02 15:20:25 -07:00
Ming Lei b5dd2f6047 block: loop: improve performance via blk-mq
The conversion is a bit straightforward, and use work queue to
dispatch requests of loop block, and one big change is that requests
is submitted to backend file/device concurrently with work queue,
so throughput may get improved much. Given write requests over same
file are often run exclusively, so don't handle them concurrently for
avoiding extra context switch cost, possible lock contention and work
schedule cost. Also with blk-mq, there is opportunity to get loop I/O
merged before submitting to backend file/device.

In the following test:
	- base: v3.19-rc2-2041231
	- loop over file in ext4 file system on SSD disk
	- bs: 4k, libaio, io depth: 64, O_DIRECT, num of jobs: 1
	- throughput: IOPS

	------------------------------------------------------
	|            | base      | base with loop-mq | delta |
	------------------------------------------------------
	| randread   | 1740      | 25318             | +1355%|
	------------------------------------------------------
	| read       | 42196     | 51771             | +22.6%|
	-----------------------------------------------------
	| randwrite  | 35709     | 34624             | -3%   |
	-----------------------------------------------------
	| write      | 39137     | 40326             | +3%   |
	-----------------------------------------------------

So loop-mq can improve throughput for both read and randread, meantime,
performance of write and randwrite isn't hurted basically.

Another benefit is that loop driver code gets simplified
much after blk-mq conversion, and the patch can be thought as
cleanup too.

Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
2015-01-02 15:07:49 -07:00
Al Viro 83a8761142 move linux/loop.h to drivers/block
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-06-29 12:46:45 +04:00