Context switches and TLB flushes can change individual bits of CR4.
CR4 reads take several cycles, so store a shadow copy of CR4 in a
per-cpu variable.
To avoid wasting a cache line, I added the CR4 shadow to
cpu_tlbstate, which is already touched in switch_mm. The heaviest
users of the cr4 shadow will be switch_mm and __switch_to_xtra, and
__switch_to_xtra is called shortly after switch_mm during context
switch, so the cacheline is likely to be hot.
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Vince Weaver <vince@deater.net>
Cc: "hillf.zj" <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com>
Cc: Valdis Kletnieks <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/3a54dd3353fffbf84804398e00dfdc5b7c1afd7d.1414190806.git.luto@amacapital.net
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
A sparse warning is generated about
'tlb_single_page_flush_ceiling' not being declared.
arch/x86/mm/tlb.c:177:15: warning: symbol
'tlb_single_page_flush_ceiling' was not declared. Should it be static?
Since it isn't used anywhere outside this file, fix the warning
by making it static.
Also, optimize the use of this variable by adding the
__read_mostly directive, as suggested by David Rientjes.
Suggested-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeremiah Mahler <jmmahler@gmail.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1407569913-4035-1-git-send-email-jmmahler@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
This has been run through Intel's LKP tests across a wide range
of modern sytems and workloads and it wasn't shown to make a
measurable performance difference positive or negative.
Now that we have some shiny new tracepoints, we can actually
figure out what the heck is going on.
During a kernel compile, 60% of the flush_tlb_mm_range() calls
are for a single page. It breaks down like this:
size percent percent<=
V V V
GLOBAL: 2.20% 2.20% avg cycles: 2283
1: 56.92% 59.12% avg cycles: 1276
2: 13.78% 72.90% avg cycles: 1505
3: 8.26% 81.16% avg cycles: 1880
4: 7.41% 88.58% avg cycles: 2447
5: 1.73% 90.31% avg cycles: 2358
6: 1.32% 91.63% avg cycles: 2563
7: 1.14% 92.77% avg cycles: 2862
8: 0.62% 93.39% avg cycles: 3542
9: 0.08% 93.47% avg cycles: 3289
10: 0.43% 93.90% avg cycles: 3570
11: 0.20% 94.10% avg cycles: 3767
12: 0.08% 94.18% avg cycles: 3996
13: 0.03% 94.20% avg cycles: 4077
14: 0.02% 94.23% avg cycles: 4836
15: 0.04% 94.26% avg cycles: 5699
16: 0.06% 94.32% avg cycles: 5041
17: 0.57% 94.89% avg cycles: 5473
18: 0.02% 94.91% avg cycles: 5396
19: 0.03% 94.95% avg cycles: 5296
20: 0.02% 94.96% avg cycles: 6749
21: 0.18% 95.14% avg cycles: 6225
22: 0.01% 95.15% avg cycles: 6393
23: 0.01% 95.16% avg cycles: 6861
24: 0.12% 95.28% avg cycles: 6912
25: 0.05% 95.32% avg cycles: 7190
26: 0.01% 95.33% avg cycles: 7793
27: 0.01% 95.34% avg cycles: 7833
28: 0.01% 95.35% avg cycles: 8253
29: 0.08% 95.42% avg cycles: 8024
30: 0.03% 95.45% avg cycles: 9670
31: 0.01% 95.46% avg cycles: 8949
32: 0.01% 95.46% avg cycles: 9350
33: 3.11% 98.57% avg cycles: 8534
34: 0.02% 98.60% avg cycles: 10977
35: 0.02% 98.62% avg cycles: 11400
We get in to dimishing returns pretty quickly. On pre-IvyBridge
CPUs, we used to set the limit at 8 pages, and it was set at 128
on IvyBrige. That 128 number looks pretty silly considering that
less than 0.5% of the flushes are that large.
The previous code tried to size this number based on the size of
the TLB. Good idea, but it's error-prone, needs maintenance
(which it didn't get up to now), and probably would not matter in
practice much.
Settting it to 33 means that we cover the mallopt
M_TRIM_THRESHOLD, which is the most universally common size to do
flushes.
That's the short version. Here's the long one for why I chose 33:
1. These numbers have a constant bias in the timestamps from the
tracing. Probably counts for a couple hundred cycles in each of
these tests, but it should be fairly _even_ across all of them.
The smallest delta between the tracepoints I have ever seen is
335 cycles. This is one reason the cycles/page cost goes down in
general as the flushes get larger. The true cost is nearer to
100 cycles.
2. A full flush is more expensive than a single invlpg, but not
by much (single percentages).
3. A dtlb miss is 17.1ns (~45 cycles) and a itlb miss is 13.0ns
(~34 cycles). At those rates, refilling the 512-entry dTLB takes
22,000 cycles.
4. 22,000 cycles is approximately the equivalent of doing 85
invlpg operations. But, the odds are that the TLB can
actually be filled up faster than that because TLB misses that
are close in time also tend to leverage the same caches.
6. ~98% of flushes are <=33 pages. There are a lot of flushes of
33 pages, probably because libc's M_TRIM_THRESHOLD is set to
128k (32 pages)
7. I've found no consistent data to support changing the IvyBridge
vs. SandyBridge tunable by a factor of 16
I used the performance counters on this hardware (IvyBridge i5-3320M)
to figure out the tlb miss costs:
ocperf.py stat -e dtlb_load_misses.walk_duration,dtlb_load_misses.walk_completed,dtlb_store_misses.walk_duration,dtlb_store_misses.walk_completed,itlb_misses.walk_duration,itlb_misses.walk_completed,itlb.itlb_flush
7,720,030,970 dtlb_load_misses_walk_duration [57.13%]
169,856,353 dtlb_load_misses_walk_completed [57.15%]
708,832,859 dtlb_store_misses_walk_duration [57.17%]
19,346,823 dtlb_store_misses_walk_completed [57.17%]
2,779,687,402 itlb_misses_walk_duration [57.15%]
82,241,148 itlb_misses_walk_completed [57.13%]
770,717 itlb_itlb_flush [57.11%]
Show that a dtlb miss is 17.1ns (~45 cycles) and a itlb miss is 13.0ns
(~34 cycles). At those rates, refilling the 512-entry dTLB takes
22,000 cycles. On a SandyBridge system with more cores and larger
caches, those are dtlb=13.4ns and itlb=9.5ns.
cat perf.stat.txt | perl -pe 's/,//g'
| awk '/itlb_misses_walk_duration/ { icyc+=$1 }
/itlb_misses_walk_completed/ { imiss+=$1 }
/dtlb_.*_walk_duration/ { dcyc+=$1 }
/dtlb_.*.*completed/ { dmiss+=$1 }
END {print "itlb cyc/miss: ", icyc/imiss, " dtlb cyc/miss: ", dcyc/dmiss, " ----- ", icyc,imiss, dcyc,dmiss }
On Westmere CPUs, the counters to use are: itlb_flush,itlb_misses.walk_cycles,itlb_misses.any,dtlb_misses.walk_cycles,dtlb_misses.any
The assumptions that this code went in under:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/6/12/119 say that a flush and a refill are
about 100ns. Being generous, that is over by a factor of 6 on the
refill side, although it is fairly close on the cost of an invlpg.
An increase of a single invlpg operation seems to lengthen the flush
range operation by about 200 cycles. Here is one example of the data
collected for flushing 10 and 11 pages (full data are below):
10: 0.43% 93.90% avg cycles: 3570 cycles/page: 357 samples: 4714
11: 0.20% 94.10% avg cycles: 3767 cycles/page: 342 samples: 2145
How to generate this table:
echo 10000 > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/buffer_size_kb
echo x86-tsc > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace_clock
echo 'reason != 0' > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/tlb/tlb_flush/filter
echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/tlb/tlb_flush/enable
Pipe the trace output in to this script:
http://sr71.net/~dave/intel/201402-tlb/trace-time-diff-process.pl.txt
Note that these data were gathered with the invlpg threshold set to
150 pages. Only data points with >=50 of samples were printed:
Flush % of %<=
in flush this
pages es size
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-1: 2.20% 2.20% avg cycles: 2283 cycles/page: xxxx samples: 23960
1: 56.92% 59.12% avg cycles: 1276 cycles/page: 1276 samples: 620895
2: 13.78% 72.90% avg cycles: 1505 cycles/page: 752 samples: 150335
3: 8.26% 81.16% avg cycles: 1880 cycles/page: 626 samples: 90131
4: 7.41% 88.58% avg cycles: 2447 cycles/page: 611 samples: 80877
5: 1.73% 90.31% avg cycles: 2358 cycles/page: 471 samples: 18885
6: 1.32% 91.63% avg cycles: 2563 cycles/page: 427 samples: 14397
7: 1.14% 92.77% avg cycles: 2862 cycles/page: 408 samples: 12441
8: 0.62% 93.39% avg cycles: 3542 cycles/page: 442 samples: 6721
9: 0.08% 93.47% avg cycles: 3289 cycles/page: 365 samples: 917
10: 0.43% 93.90% avg cycles: 3570 cycles/page: 357 samples: 4714
11: 0.20% 94.10% avg cycles: 3767 cycles/page: 342 samples: 2145
12: 0.08% 94.18% avg cycles: 3996 cycles/page: 333 samples: 864
13: 0.03% 94.20% avg cycles: 4077 cycles/page: 313 samples: 289
14: 0.02% 94.23% avg cycles: 4836 cycles/page: 345 samples: 236
15: 0.04% 94.26% avg cycles: 5699 cycles/page: 379 samples: 390
16: 0.06% 94.32% avg cycles: 5041 cycles/page: 315 samples: 643
17: 0.57% 94.89% avg cycles: 5473 cycles/page: 321 samples: 6229
18: 0.02% 94.91% avg cycles: 5396 cycles/page: 299 samples: 224
19: 0.03% 94.95% avg cycles: 5296 cycles/page: 278 samples: 367
20: 0.02% 94.96% avg cycles: 6749 cycles/page: 337 samples: 185
21: 0.18% 95.14% avg cycles: 6225 cycles/page: 296 samples: 1964
22: 0.01% 95.15% avg cycles: 6393 cycles/page: 290 samples: 83
23: 0.01% 95.16% avg cycles: 6861 cycles/page: 298 samples: 61
24: 0.12% 95.28% avg cycles: 6912 cycles/page: 288 samples: 1307
25: 0.05% 95.32% avg cycles: 7190 cycles/page: 287 samples: 533
26: 0.01% 95.33% avg cycles: 7793 cycles/page: 299 samples: 94
27: 0.01% 95.34% avg cycles: 7833 cycles/page: 290 samples: 66
28: 0.01% 95.35% avg cycles: 8253 cycles/page: 294 samples: 73
29: 0.08% 95.42% avg cycles: 8024 cycles/page: 276 samples: 846
30: 0.03% 95.45% avg cycles: 9670 cycles/page: 322 samples: 296
31: 0.01% 95.46% avg cycles: 8949 cycles/page: 288 samples: 79
32: 0.01% 95.46% avg cycles: 9350 cycles/page: 292 samples: 60
33: 3.11% 98.57% avg cycles: 8534 cycles/page: 258 samples: 33936
34: 0.02% 98.60% avg cycles: 10977 cycles/page: 322 samples: 268
35: 0.02% 98.62% avg cycles: 11400 cycles/page: 325 samples: 177
36: 0.01% 98.63% avg cycles: 11504 cycles/page: 319 samples: 161
37: 0.02% 98.65% avg cycles: 11596 cycles/page: 313 samples: 182
38: 0.02% 98.66% avg cycles: 11850 cycles/page: 311 samples: 195
39: 0.01% 98.68% avg cycles: 12158 cycles/page: 311 samples: 128
40: 0.01% 98.68% avg cycles: 11626 cycles/page: 290 samples: 78
41: 0.04% 98.73% avg cycles: 11435 cycles/page: 278 samples: 477
42: 0.01% 98.73% avg cycles: 12571 cycles/page: 299 samples: 74
43: 0.01% 98.74% avg cycles: 12562 cycles/page: 292 samples: 78
44: 0.01% 98.75% avg cycles: 12991 cycles/page: 295 samples: 108
45: 0.01% 98.76% avg cycles: 13169 cycles/page: 292 samples: 78
46: 0.02% 98.78% avg cycles: 12891 cycles/page: 280 samples: 261
47: 0.01% 98.79% avg cycles: 13099 cycles/page: 278 samples: 67
48: 0.01% 98.80% avg cycles: 13851 cycles/page: 288 samples: 77
49: 0.01% 98.80% avg cycles: 13749 cycles/page: 280 samples: 66
50: 0.01% 98.81% avg cycles: 13949 cycles/page: 278 samples: 73
52: 0.00% 98.82% avg cycles: 14243 cycles/page: 273 samples: 52
54: 0.01% 98.83% avg cycles: 15312 cycles/page: 283 samples: 87
55: 0.01% 98.84% avg cycles: 15197 cycles/page: 276 samples: 109
56: 0.02% 98.86% avg cycles: 15234 cycles/page: 272 samples: 208
57: 0.00% 98.86% avg cycles: 14888 cycles/page: 261 samples: 53
58: 0.01% 98.87% avg cycles: 15037 cycles/page: 259 samples: 59
59: 0.01% 98.87% avg cycles: 15752 cycles/page: 266 samples: 63
62: 0.00% 98.89% avg cycles: 16222 cycles/page: 261 samples: 54
64: 0.02% 98.91% avg cycles: 17179 cycles/page: 268 samples: 248
65: 0.12% 99.03% avg cycles: 18762 cycles/page: 288 samples: 1324
85: 0.00% 99.10% avg cycles: 21649 cycles/page: 254 samples: 50
127: 0.01% 99.18% avg cycles: 32397 cycles/page: 255 samples: 75
128: 0.13% 99.31% avg cycles: 31711 cycles/page: 247 samples: 1466
129: 0.18% 99.49% avg cycles: 33017 cycles/page: 255 samples: 1927
181: 0.33% 99.84% avg cycles: 2489 cycles/page: 13 samples: 3547
256: 0.05% 99.91% avg cycles: 2305 cycles/page: 9 samples: 550
512: 0.03% 99.95% avg cycles: 2133 cycles/page: 4 samples: 304
1512: 0.01% 99.99% avg cycles: 3038 cycles/page: 2 samples: 65
Here are the tlb counters during a 10-second slice of a kernel compile
for a SandyBridge system. It's better than IvyBridge, but probably
due to the larger caches since this was one of the 'X' extreme parts.
10,873,007,282 dtlb_load_misses_walk_duration
250,711,333 dtlb_load_misses_walk_completed
1,212,395,865 dtlb_store_misses_walk_duration
31,615,772 dtlb_store_misses_walk_completed
5,091,010,274 itlb_misses_walk_duration
163,193,511 itlb_misses_walk_completed
1,321,980 itlb_itlb_flush
10.008045158 seconds time elapsed
# cat perf.stat.1392743721.txt | perl -pe 's/,//g' | awk '/itlb_misses_walk_duration/ { icyc+=$1 } /itlb_misses_walk_completed/ { imiss+=$1 } /dtlb_.*_walk_duration/ { dcyc+=$1 } /dtlb_.*.*completed/ { dmiss+=$1 } END {print "itlb cyc/miss: ", icyc/imiss/3.3, " dtlb cyc/miss: ", dcyc/dmiss/3.3, " ----- ", icyc,imiss, dcyc,dmiss }'
itlb ns/miss: 9.45338 dtlb ns/miss: 12.9716
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140731154103.10C1115E@viggo.jf.intel.com
Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
Most of the logic here is in the documentation file. Please take
a look at it.
I know we've come full-circle here back to a tunable, but this
new one is *WAY* simpler. I challenge anyone to describe in one
sentence how the old one worked. Here's the way the new one
works:
If we are flushing more pages than the ceiling, we use
the full flush, otherwise we use per-page flushes.
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140731154101.12B52CAF@viggo.jf.intel.com
Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
We don't have any good way to figure out what kinds of flushes
are being attempted. Right now, we can try to use the vm
counters, but those only tell us what we actually did with the
hardware (one-by-one vs full) and don't tell us what was actually
_requested_.
This allows us to select out "interesting" TLB flushes that we
might want to optimize (like the ranged ones) and ignore the ones
that we have very little control over (the ones at context
switch).
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140731154059.4C96CBA5@viggo.jf.intel.com
Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
There are currently three paths through the remote flush code:
1. full invalidation
2. single page invalidation using invlpg
3. ranged invalidation using invlpg
This takes 2 and 3 and combines them in to a single path by
making the single-page one just be the start and end be start
plus a single page. This makes placement of our tracepoint easier.
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140731154058.E0F90408@viggo.jf.intel.com
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
If we take the
if (end == TLB_FLUSH_ALL || vmflag & VM_HUGETLB) {
local_flush_tlb();
goto out;
}
path out of flush_tlb_mm_range(), we will have flushed the tlb,
but not incremented NR_TLB_LOCAL_FLUSH_ALL. This unifies the
way out of the function so that we always take a single path when
doing a full tlb flush.
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140731154056.FF763B76@viggo.jf.intel.com
Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
I think the flush_tlb_mm_range() code that tries to tune the
flush sizes based on the CPU needs to get ripped out for
several reasons:
1. It is obviously buggy. It uses mm->total_vm to judge the
task's footprint in the TLB. It should certainly be using
some measure of RSS, *NOT* ->total_vm since only resident
memory can populate the TLB.
2. Haswell, and several other CPUs are missing from the
intel_tlb_flushall_shift_set() function. Thus, it has been
demonstrated to bitrot quickly in practice.
3. It is plain wrong in my vm:
[ 0.037444] Last level iTLB entries: 4KB 0, 2MB 0, 4MB 0
[ 0.037444] Last level dTLB entries: 4KB 0, 2MB 0, 4MB 0
[ 0.037444] tlb_flushall_shift: 6
Which leads to it to never use invlpg.
4. The assumptions about TLB refill costs are wrong:
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1337782555-8088-3-git-send-email-alex.shi@intel.com
(more on this in later patches)
5. I can not reproduce the original data: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/5/17/59
I believe the sample times were too short. Running the
benchmark in a loop yields times that vary quite a bit.
Note that this leaves us with a static ceiling of 1 page. This
is a conservative, dumb setting, and will be revised in a later
patch.
This also removes the code which attempts to predict whether we
are flushing data or instructions. We expect instruction flushes
to be relatively rare and not worth tuning for explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140731154055.ABC88E89@viggo.jf.intel.com
Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
The
if (cpumask_any_but(mm_cpumask(mm), smp_processor_id()) < nr_cpu_ids)
line of code is not exactly the easiest to audit, especially when
it ends up at two different indentation levels. This eliminates
one of the the copy-n-paste versions. It also gives us a unified
exit point for each path through this function. We need this in
a minute for our tracepoint.
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140731154054.44F1CDDC@viggo.jf.intel.com
Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
When choosing between doing an address space or ranged flush,
the x86 implementation of flush_tlb_mm_range takes into account
whether there are any large pages in the range. A per-page
flush typically requires fewer entries than would covered by a
single large page and the check is redundant.
There is one potential exception. THP migration flushes single
THP entries and it conceivably would benefit from flushing a
single entry instead of the mm. However, this flush is after a
THP allocation, copy and page table update potentially with any
other threads serialised behind it. In comparison to that, the
flush is noise. It makes more sense to optimise balancing to
require fewer flushes than to optimise the flush itself.
This patch deletes the redundant huge page check.
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Tested-by: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@hp.com>
Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-sgei1drpOcburujPsfh6ovmo@git.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
NR_TLB_LOCAL_FLUSH_ALL is not always accounted for correctly and
the comparison with total_vm is done before taking
tlb_flushall_shift into account. Clean it up.
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Tested-by: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@hp.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-Iz5gcahrgskIldvukulzi0hh@git.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Bisection between 3.11 and 3.12 fingered commit 9824cf97 ("mm:
vmstats: tlb flush counters") to cause overhead problems.
The counters are undeniably useful but how often do we really
need to debug TLB flush related issues? It does not justify
taking the penalty everywhere so make it a debugging option.
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Tested-by: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@hp.com>
Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-XzxjntugxuwpxXhcrxqqh53b@git.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
The previous patch doing vmstats for TLB flushes ("mm: vmstats: tlb flush
counters") effectively missed UP since arch/x86/mm/tlb.c is only compiled
for SMP.
UP systems do not do remote TLB flushes, so compile those counters out on
UP.
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/generic.c calls __flush_tlb() directly. This is
probably an optimization since both the mtrr code and __flush_tlb() write
cr4. It would probably be safe to make that a flush_tlb_all() (and then
get these statistics), but the mtrr code is ancient and I'm hesitant to
touch it other than to just stick in the counters.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: tweak comments]
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
I was investigating some TLB flush scaling issues and realized that we do
not have any good methods for figuring out how many TLB flushes we are
doing.
It would be nice to be able to do these in generic code, but the
arch-independent calls don't explicitly specify whether we actually need
to do remote flushes or not. In the end, we really need to know if we
actually _did_ global vs. local invalidations, so that leaves us with few
options other than to muck with the counters from arch-specific code.
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
commit 611ae8e3f5204f7480b3b405993b3352cfa16662('enable tlb flush range
support for x86') change flush_tlb_mm_range() considerably. After this,
we test whether vmflag equal to VM_HUGETLB and it may be always failed,
because vmflag usually has other flags simultaneously.
Our intention is to check whether this vma is for hughtlb, so correct it
according to this purpose.
Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1352740656-19417-1-git-send-email-js1304@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
As TLB shootdown requests to other CPU cores are now using function call
interrupts, TLB shootdowns entry in /proc/interrupts is always shown as 0.
This behavior change was introduced by commit 52aec3308d ("x86/tlb:
replace INVALIDATE_TLB_VECTOR by CALL_FUNCTION_VECTOR").
This patch reverts TLB shootdowns entry in /proc/interrupts to count TLB
shootdowns separately from the other function call interrupts.
Signed-off-by: Tomoki Sekiyama <tomoki.sekiyama.qu@hitachi.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20120926021128.22212.20440.stgit@hpxw
Acked-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
Since the shift count settable there is used for shifting values
of type "unsigned long", its value must not match or exceed
BITS_PER_LONG (otherwise the shift operations are undefined).
Similarly, the value must not be negative (but -1 must be
permitted, as that's the value used to distinguish the case of
the fine grained flushing being disabled).
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/5049B65C020000780009990C@nat28.tlf.novell.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
This patch do flush_tlb_kernel_range by 'invlpg'. The performance pay
and gain was analyzed in previous patch
(x86/flush_tlb: try flush_tlb_single one by one in flush_tlb_range).
In the testing: http://lkml.org/lkml/2012/6/21/10
The pay is mostly covered by long kernel path, but the gain is still
quite clear, memory access in user APP can increase 30+% when kernel
execute this funtion.
Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1340845344-27557-10-git-send-email-alex.shi@intel.com
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
There are 32 INVALIDATE_TLB_VECTOR now in kernel. That is quite big
amount of vector in IDT. But it is still not enough, since modern x86
sever has more cpu number. That still causes heavy lock contention
in TLB flushing.
The patch using generic smp call function to replace it. That saved 32
vector number in IDT, and resolved the lock contention in TLB
flushing on large system.
In the NHM EX machine 4P * 8cores * HT = 64 CPUs, hackbench pthread
has 3% performance increase.
Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1340845344-27557-9-git-send-email-alex.shi@intel.com
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Not every tlb_flush execution moment is really need to evacuate all
TLB entries, like in munmap, just few 'invlpg' is better for whole
process performance, since it leaves most of TLB entries for later
accessing.
This patch also rewrite flush_tlb_range for 2 purposes:
1, split it out to get flush_blt_mm_range function.
2, clean up to reduce line breaking, thanks for Borislav's input.
My micro benchmark 'mummap' http://lkml.org/lkml/2012/5/17/59
show that the random memory access on other CPU has 0~50% speed up
on a 2P * 4cores * HT NHM EP while do 'munmap'.
Thanks Yongjie's testing on this patch:
-------------
I used Linux 3.4-RC6 w/ and w/o his patches as Xen dom0 and guest
kernel.
After running two benchmarks in Xen HVM guest, I found his patches
brought about 1%~3% performance gain in 'kernel build' and 'netperf'
testing, though the performance gain was not very stable in 'kernel
build' testing.
Some detailed testing results are below.
Testing Environment:
Hardware: Romley-EP platform
Xen version: latest upstream
Linux kernel: 3.4-RC6
Guest vCPU number: 8
NIC: Intel 82599 (10GB bandwidth)
In 'kernel build' testing in guest:
Command line | performance gain
make -j 4 | 3.81%
make -j 8 | 0.37%
make -j 16 | -0.52%
In 'netperf' testing, we tested TCP_STREAM with default socket size
16384 byte as large packet and 64 byte as small packet.
I used several clients to add networking pressure, then 'netperf' server
automatically generated several threads to response them.
I also used large-size packet and small-size packet in the testing.
Packet size | Thread number | performance gain
16384 bytes | 4 | 0.02%
16384 bytes | 8 | 2.21%
16384 bytes | 16 | 2.04%
64 bytes | 4 | 1.07%
64 bytes | 8 | 3.31%
64 bytes | 16 | 0.71%
Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1340845344-27557-8-git-send-email-alex.shi@intel.com
Tested-by: Ren, Yongjie <yongjie.ren@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
kernel will replace cr3 rewrite with invlpg when
tlb_flush_entries <= active_tlb_entries / 2^tlb_flushall_factor
if tlb_flushall_factor is -1, kernel won't do this replacement.
User can modify its value according to specific CPU/applications.
Thanks for Borislav providing the help message of
CONFIG_DEBUG_TLBFLUSH.
Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1340845344-27557-6-git-send-email-alex.shi@intel.com
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Testing show different CPU type(micro architectures and NUMA mode) has
different balance points between the TLB flush all and multiple invlpg.
And there also has cases the tlb flush change has no any help.
This patch give a interface to let x86 vendor developers have a chance
to set different shift for different CPU type.
like some machine in my hands, balance points is 16 entries on
Romely-EP; while it is at 8 entries on Bloomfield NHM-EP; and is 256 on
IVB mobile CPU. but on model 15 core2 Xeon using invlpg has nothing
help.
For untested machine, do a conservative optimization, same as NHM CPU.
Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1340845344-27557-5-git-send-email-alex.shi@intel.com
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
We don't need to flush large pages by PAGE_SIZE step, that just waste
time. and actually, large page don't need 'invlpg' optimizing according
to our micro benchmark. So, just flush whole TLB is enough for them.
The following result is tested on a 2CPU * 4cores * 2HT NHM EP machine,
with THP 'always' setting.
Multi-thread testing, '-t' paramter is thread number:
without this patch with this patch
./mprotect -t 1 14ns 13ns
./mprotect -t 2 13ns 13ns
./mprotect -t 4 12ns 11ns
./mprotect -t 8 14ns 10ns
./mprotect -t 16 28ns 28ns
./mprotect -t 32 54ns 52ns
./mprotect -t 128 200ns 200ns
Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1340845344-27557-4-git-send-email-alex.shi@intel.com
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
x86 has no flush_tlb_range support in instruction level. Currently the
flush_tlb_range just implemented by flushing all page table. That is not
the best solution for all scenarios. In fact, if we just use 'invlpg' to
flush few lines from TLB, we can get the performance gain from later
remain TLB lines accessing.
But the 'invlpg' instruction costs much of time. Its execution time can
compete with cr3 rewriting, and even a bit more on SNB CPU.
So, on a 512 4KB TLB entries CPU, the balance points is at:
(512 - X) * 100ns(assumed TLB refill cost) =
X(TLB flush entries) * 100ns(assumed invlpg cost)
Here, X is 256, that is 1/2 of 512 entries.
But with the mysterious CPU pre-fetcher and page miss handler Unit, the
assumed TLB refill cost is far lower then 100ns in sequential access. And
2 HT siblings in one core makes the memory access more faster if they are
accessing the same memory. So, in the patch, I just do the change when
the target entries is less than 1/16 of whole active tlb entries.
Actually, I have no data support for the percentage '1/16', so any
suggestions are welcomed.
As to hugetlb, guess due to smaller page table, and smaller active TLB
entries, I didn't see benefit via my benchmark, so no optimizing now.
My micro benchmark show in ideal scenarios, the performance improves 70
percent in reading. And in worst scenario, the reading/writing
performance is similar with unpatched 3.4-rc4 kernel.
Here is the reading data on my 2P * 4cores *HT NHM EP machine, with THP
'always':
multi thread testing, '-t' paramter is thread number:
with patch unpatched 3.4-rc4
./mprotect -t 1 14ns 24ns
./mprotect -t 2 13ns 22ns
./mprotect -t 4 12ns 19ns
./mprotect -t 8 14ns 16ns
./mprotect -t 16 28ns 26ns
./mprotect -t 32 54ns 51ns
./mprotect -t 128 200ns 199ns
Single process with sequencial flushing and memory accessing:
with patch unpatched 3.4-rc4
./mprotect 7ns 11ns
./mprotect -p 4096 -l 8 -n 10240
21ns 21ns
[ hpa: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1B4B44D9196EFF41AE41FDA404FC0A100BFF94@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com
has additional performance numbers. ]
Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1340845344-27557-3-git-send-email-alex.shi@intel.com
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Pull x86 mm changes from Ingo Molnar:
"This tree includes a micro-optimization that avoids cr3 switches
during idling; it fixes corner cases and there's also small cleanups"
Fix up trivial context conflict with the percpu_xx -> this_cpu_xx
changes.
* 'x86-mm-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
x86-64: Fix accounting in kernel_physical_mapping_init()
x86/tlb: Clean up and unify TLB_FLUSH_ALL definition
x86: Drop obsolete ARCH_BOOTMEM support
x86, tlb: Switch cr3 in leave_mm() only when needed
x86/mm: Fix the size calculation of mapping tables
Since percpu_xxx() serial functions are duplicated with this_cpu_xxx().
Removing percpu_xxx() definition and replacing them by this_cpu_xxx()
in code. There is no function change in this patch, just preparation for
later percpu_xxx serial function removing.
On x86 machine the this_cpu_xxx() serial functions are same as
__this_cpu_xxx() without no unnecessary premmpt enable/disable.
Thanks for Stephen Rothwell, he found and fixed a i386 build error in
the patch.
Also thanks for Andrew Morton, he kept updating the patchset in Linus'
tree.
Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Acked-by: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Currently leave_mm() unconditionally switches the cr3 to swapper_pg_dir.
But there is no need to change the cr3, if we already left that mm.
intel_idle() for example calls leave_mm() on every deep c-state entry where
the CPU flushes the TLB for us. Similarly flush_tlb_all() was also calling
leave_mm() whenever the TLB is in LAZY state. Both these paths will be
improved with this change.
Signed-off-by: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1332460885.16101.147.camel@sbsiddha-desk.sc.intel.com
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
native_flush_tlb_others() is called from:
flush_tlb_current_task()
flush_tlb_mm()
flush_tlb_page()
All these functions disable preemption explicitly, so we can use
smp_processor_id() instead of get_cpu() and put_cpu().
Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Cliff Wickman <cpw@sgi.com>
LKML-Reference: <4D7EC791.4040003@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This one isn't related to previous patch. If online cpus are
below NUM_INVALIDATE_TLB_VECTORS, we don't need the lock. The
comments in the code declares we don't need the check, but a hot
lock still needs an atomic operation and expensive, so add the
check here.
Uses nr_cpu_ids here as suggested by Eric Dumazet.
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
LKML-Reference: <1295232730.1949.710.camel@sli10-conroe>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Found a NUMA system that doesn't have RAM installed at the first
socket which hangs while executing init scripts.
bisected it to:
| commit 9329672021
| Author: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
| Date: Wed Oct 20 11:07:03 2010 +0800
|
| x86: Spread tlb flush vector between nodes
It turns out when first socket is not online it could have cpus on
node1 tlb_offset set to bigger than NUM_INVALIDATE_TLB_VECTORS.
That could affect systems like 4 sockets, but socket 2 doesn't
have installed, sockets 3 will get too big tlb_offset.
Need to use real online node idx.
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
LKML-Reference: <4CDEDE59.40603@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Mark tlb_cpuhp_notify as __cpuinit. It's basically a callback
function, which is called from __cpuinit init_smp_flash(). So -
it's safe.
We were warned by the following warning:
WARNING: arch/x86/mm/built-in.o(.text+0x356d): Section mismatch
in reference from the function tlb_cpuhp_notify() to the
function .cpuinit.text:calculate_tlb_offset()
The function tlb_cpuhp_notify() references
the function __cpuinit calculate_tlb_offset().
This is often because tlb_cpuhp_notify lacks a __cpuinit
annotation or the annotation of calculate_tlb_offset is wrong.
Signed-off-by: Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@gmail.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
Cc: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
LKML-Reference: <AANLkTinWQRG=HA9uB3ad0KAqRRTinL6L_4iKgF84coph@mail.gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Currently flush tlb vector allocation is based on below equation:
sender = smp_processor_id() % 8
This isn't optimal, CPUs from different node can have the same vector, this
causes a lot of lock contention. Instead, we can assign the same vectors to
CPUs from the same node, while different node has different vectors. This has
below advantages:
a. if there is lock contention, the lock contention is between CPUs from one
node. This should be much cheaper than the contention between nodes.
b. completely avoid lock contention between nodes. This especially benefits
kswapd, which is the biggest user of tlb flush, since kswapd sets its affinity
to specific node.
In my test, this could reduce > 20% CPU overhead in extreme case.The test
machine has 4 nodes and each node has 16 CPUs. I then bind each node's kswapd
to the first CPU of the node. I run a workload with 4 sequential mmap file
read thread. The files are empty sparse file. This workload will trigger a
lot of page reclaim and tlbflush. The kswapd bind is to easy trigger the
extreme tlb flush lock contention because otherwise kswapd keeps migrating
between CPUs of a node and I can't get stable result. Sure in real workload,
we can't always see so big tlb flush lock contention, but it's possible.
[ hpa: folded in fix from Eric Dumazet to use this_cpu_read() ]
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
LKML-Reference: <1287544023.4571.8.camel@sli10-conroe.sh.intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
smp_processor_id() returns an int and not an unsigned long.
Also, since the function is small enough, there's no need for a
local variable caching its value.
No functionality change, just cleanup.
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
LKML-Reference: <20100721124705.GA674@aftab>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Rather than having X86_L1_CACHE_BYTES and X86_L1_CACHE_SHIFT
(with inconsistent defaults), just having the latter suffices as
the former can be easily calculated from it.
To be consistent, also change X86_INTERNODE_CACHE_BYTES to
X86_INTERNODE_CACHE_SHIFT, and set it to 7 (128 bytes) for NUMA
to account for last level cache line size (which here matters
more than L1 cache line size).
Finally, make sure the default value for X86_L1_CACHE_SHIFT,
when X86_GENERIC is selected, is being seen before that for the
individual CPU model options (other than on x86-64, where
GENERIC_CPU is part of the choice construct, X86_GENERIC is a
separate option on ix86).
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
Acked-by: Ravikiran Thirumalai <kiran@scalex86.org>
Acked-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
LKML-Reference: <4AFD5710020000780001F8F0@vpn.id2.novell.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Makes code futureproof against the impending change to mm->cpu_vm_mask (to be a pointer).
It's also a chance to use the new cpumask_ ops which take a pointer
(the older ones are deprecated, but there's no hurry for arch code).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
As noted in 83d349f35e ("x86: don't send
an IPI to the empty set of CPU's"), some APIC's will be very unhappy
with an empty destination mask. That commit added a WARN_ON() for that
case, and avoided the resulting problem, but didn't fix the underlying
reason for why those empty mask cases happened.
This fixes that, by checking the result of 'cpumask_andnot()' of the
current CPU actually has any other CPU's left in the set of CPU's to be
sent a TLB flush, and not calling down to the IPI code if the mask is
empty.
The reason this started happening at all is that we started passing just
the CPU mask pointers around in commit 4595f9620 ("x86: change
flush_tlb_others to take a const struct cpumask"), and when we did that,
the cpumask was no longer thread-local.
Before that commit, flush_tlb_mm() used to create it's own copy of
'mm->cpu_vm_mask' and pass that copy down to the low-level flush
routines after having tested that it was not empty. But after changing
it to just pass down the CPU mask pointer, the lower level TLB flush
routines would now get a pointer to that 'mm->cpu_vm_mask', and that
could still change - and become empty - after the test due to other
CPU's having flushed their own TLB's.
See
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13933
for details.
Tested-by: Thomas Björnell <thomas.bjornell@gmail.com>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Impact: optimize APIC IPI related barriers
Uncached MMIO accesses for xapic are inherently serializing and hence
we don't need explicit barriers for xapic IPI paths.
x2apic MSR writes/reads don't have serializing semantics and hence need
a serializing instruction or mfence, to make all the previous memory
stores globally visisble before the x2apic msr write for IPI.
Add x2apic_wrmsr_fence() in flush tlb path to x2apic specific paths.
Signed-off-by: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: "steiner@sgi.com" <steiner@sgi.com>
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
LKML-Reference: <1237313814.27006.203.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Our send_IPI_*() methods and definitions are a twisted mess: the same
symbol is defined to different things depending on .config details,
in a non-transparent way.
- spread out the quirks into separately named per apic driver methods
- prefix the standard PC methods with default_
- get rid of wrapper macro obfuscation
- clean up various details
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Impact: cleanup
Now that it's unified, move the (SMP) TLB flushing code from arch/x86/kernel/
to arch/x86/mm/, where it belongs logically.
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Andy Lutomirski