This area is horrifically complicated on these chipsets, and it's likely we
will need at least a few more tweaks yet.
Oh yes, and it's completely disabled on IGPs for the moment. From traces,
things look potentially different there yet again. Sigh...
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
memtimings is a valid pointer here, the intent was to test for
kcalloc() failure.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
This changes the meaning of what we reported as "core" clock previously.
The shader/rop units are allegedly supposed to be run at the base clock
listed in the perf table, while the geometric clock can be bumped from
this value on some boards.
So that we can report both, we'll report the base clock as "shader" (since
the shaders *do* run at it), and the geometric clock as "core".
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
NV30: Create framework for memtm
NV50: Improve reg creation,
NV50: Use P.version instead of card codename/stepping,
NVC0: Initial memtiming code for Fermi,
Renamed regs for consistency,
Overall redesign to improve readability,
Avoid kfree on null-pointer
Signed-off-by: Roy Spliet <r.spliet@student.tudelft.nl>
While parsing the perf table, there is no check if
the num of entries read from the vbios is less than
the currently allocated number.
In case of a buggy vbios this will cause overwriting
of kernel memory, causing aditional problems.
Add a simple check in order to prevent the case
Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Hopefully this is how we're supposed to correctly handle when the RAMCFG
strap is above the number of entries in timing-related tables.
It's rather difficult to confirm without finding a configuration where
the ram restrict table doesn't map 8-15 back onto 0-7 anyway. There's
not a single vbios in the repo which is configured differently..
In any case, this is probably still better than potentially reading
outside of the bounds of various tables..
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
We need to parse some of these other entries still, but I've yet to
determine exactly which PLLs the rest map to.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Really not necessary here, we want to be able to see if/how we managed to
match a timingset to a performance level, even if we can't currently
program it.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
v2 (Ben Skeggs): fix ramcfg strap, and remove bogus handling of perf 0x40
Signed-off-by: Martin Peres <martin.peres@ensi-bourges.fr>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Perf tables v 1.2 and 1.3 (seen on Geforce FX/ 5) are not long enough
to store the voltage label/id
v2 - Remove comment from the code
Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
This was disabled previously because of some uncertainty that +2 was
indeed the voltage. It appears it is, checked on a NVA8 and a NVA3M.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Used on nv17-nv28, they contain memory clocks and timings, only one of
the table entries can actually be used, depending on the RAMCFG
straps, and it's usually higher than the frequency programmed on boot
by the BIOS.
The memory timings listed in table version 0x1x are used to init the
0x12xx range but they aren't required for reclocking to work.
Signed-off-by: Francisco Jerez <currojerez@riseup.net>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Ben Skeggs