The current state of the different cpuidle drivers is the different PM
operations are passed via the platform_data using the platform driver
paradigm.
This approach allowed to split the low level PM code from the arch specific
and the generic cpuidle code.
Unfortunately there are complaints about this approach as, in the context of the
single kernel image, we have multiple drivers loaded in memory for nothing and
the platform driver is not adequate for cpuidle.
This patch provides a common interface via cpuidle ops for all new cpuidle
driver and a definition for the device tree.
It will allow with the next patches to a have a common definition with ARM64
and share the same cpuidle driver.
The code is optimized to use the __init section intensively in order to reduce
the memory footprint after the driver is initialized and unify the function
names with ARM64.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Tested-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
The cpu_do_idle() function is always used by the cpuidle drivers.
That led to have each driver including cpuidle.h and proc-fns.h, they are
always paired. That makes a lot of duplicate headers inclusion. Instead of
including both in each .c file, move the proc-fns.h header inclusion in the
cpuidle.h header file directly, so we can save some line of code.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Tested-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Make necessary changes to implement time keeping and irq enabling
in the core cpuidle code. This will allow the removal of these
functionalities from various platform cpuidle implementations whose
timekeeping and irq enabling follows the form in this common code.
Signed-off-by: Robert Lee <rob.lee@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com>
Tested-by: Amit Daniel <amit.kachhap@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Robert Lee <rob.lee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Deepthi Dharwar <deepthi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Daniel Lezcano