Commit Graph

7 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Eric Paris 63c882a054 inotify: reimplement inotify using fsnotify
Reimplement inotify_user using fsnotify.  This should be feature for feature
exactly the same as the original inotify_user.  This does not make any changes
to the in kernel inotify feature used by audit.  Those patches (and the eventual
removal of in kernel inotify) will come after the new inotify_user proves to be
working correctly.

Signed-off-by: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2009-06-11 14:57:54 -04:00
Wu Fengguang 381a80e6df inotify: use GFP_NOFS in kernel_event() to work around a lockdep false-positive
There is what we believe to be a false positive reported by lockdep.

inotify_inode_queue_event() => take inotify_mutex => kernel_event() =>
kmalloc() => SLOB => alloc_pages_node() => page reclaim => slab reclaim =>
dcache reclaim => inotify_inode_is_dead => take inotify_mutex => deadlock

The plan is to fix this via lockdep annotation, but that is proving to be
quite involved.

The patch flips the allocation over to GFP_NFS to shut the warning up, for
the 2.6.30 release.

Hopefully we will fix this for real in 2.6.31.  I'll queue a patch in -mm
to switch it back to GFP_KERNEL so we don't forget.

  =================================
  [ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]
  2.6.30-rc2-next-20090417 #203
  ---------------------------------
  inconsistent {RECLAIM_FS-ON-W} -> {IN-RECLAIM_FS-W} usage.
  kswapd0/380 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes:
   (&inode->inotify_mutex){+.+.?.}, at: [<ffffffff8112f1b5>] inotify_inode_is_dead+0x35/0xb0
  {RECLAIM_FS-ON-W} state was registered at:
    [<ffffffff81079188>] mark_held_locks+0x68/0x90
    [<ffffffff810792a5>] lockdep_trace_alloc+0xf5/0x100
    [<ffffffff810f5261>] __kmalloc_node+0x31/0x1e0
    [<ffffffff81130652>] kernel_event+0xe2/0x190
    [<ffffffff81130826>] inotify_dev_queue_event+0x126/0x230
    [<ffffffff8112f096>] inotify_inode_queue_event+0xc6/0x110
    [<ffffffff8110444d>] vfs_create+0xcd/0x140
    [<ffffffff8110825d>] do_filp_open+0x88d/0xa20
    [<ffffffff810f6b68>] do_sys_open+0x98/0x140
    [<ffffffff810f6c50>] sys_open+0x20/0x30
    [<ffffffff8100c272>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
    [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
  irq event stamp: 690455
  hardirqs last  enabled at (690455): [<ffffffff81564fe4>] _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x44/0x80
  hardirqs last disabled at (690454): [<ffffffff81565372>] _spin_lock_irqsave+0x32/0xa0
  softirqs last  enabled at (690178): [<ffffffff81052282>] __do_softirq+0x202/0x220
  softirqs last disabled at (690157): [<ffffffff8100d50c>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x50

  other info that might help us debug this:
  2 locks held by kswapd0/380:
   #0:  (shrinker_rwsem){++++..}, at: [<ffffffff810d0bd7>] shrink_slab+0x37/0x180
   #1:  (&type->s_umount_key#17){++++..}, at: [<ffffffff8110cfbf>] shrink_dcache_memory+0x11f/0x1e0

  stack backtrace:
  Pid: 380, comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 2.6.30-rc2-next-20090417 #203
  Call Trace:
   [<ffffffff810789ef>] print_usage_bug+0x19f/0x200
   [<ffffffff81018bff>] ? save_stack_trace+0x2f/0x50
   [<ffffffff81078f0b>] mark_lock+0x4bb/0x6d0
   [<ffffffff810799e0>] ? check_usage_forwards+0x0/0xc0
   [<ffffffff8107b142>] __lock_acquire+0xc62/0x1ae0
   [<ffffffff810f478c>] ? slob_free+0x10c/0x370
   [<ffffffff8107c0a1>] lock_acquire+0xe1/0x120
   [<ffffffff8112f1b5>] ? inotify_inode_is_dead+0x35/0xb0
   [<ffffffff81562d43>] mutex_lock_nested+0x63/0x420
   [<ffffffff8112f1b5>] ? inotify_inode_is_dead+0x35/0xb0
   [<ffffffff8112f1b5>] ? inotify_inode_is_dead+0x35/0xb0
   [<ffffffff81012fe9>] ? sched_clock+0x9/0x10
   [<ffffffff81077165>] ? lock_release_holdtime+0x35/0x1c0
   [<ffffffff8112f1b5>] inotify_inode_is_dead+0x35/0xb0
   [<ffffffff8110c9dc>] dentry_iput+0xbc/0xe0
   [<ffffffff8110cb23>] d_kill+0x33/0x60
   [<ffffffff8110ce23>] __shrink_dcache_sb+0x2d3/0x350
   [<ffffffff8110cffa>] shrink_dcache_memory+0x15a/0x1e0
   [<ffffffff810d0cc5>] shrink_slab+0x125/0x180
   [<ffffffff810d1540>] kswapd+0x560/0x7a0
   [<ffffffff810ce160>] ? isolate_pages_global+0x0/0x2c0
   [<ffffffff81065a30>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x40
   [<ffffffff8107953d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
   [<ffffffff810d0fe0>] ? kswapd+0x0/0x7a0
   [<ffffffff8106555b>] kthread+0x5b/0xa0
   [<ffffffff8100d40a>] child_rip+0xa/0x20
   [<ffffffff8100cdd0>] ? restore_args+0x0/0x30
   [<ffffffff81065500>] ? kthread+0x0/0xa0
   [<ffffffff8100d400>] ? child_rip+0x0/0x20

[eparis@redhat.com: fix audit too]
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-05-06 16:36:09 -07:00
Vegard Nossum 3632dee2f8 inotify: clean up inotify_read and fix locking problems
If userspace supplies an invalid pointer to a read() of an inotify
instance, the inotify device's event list mutex is unlocked twice.
This causes an unbalance which effectively leaves the data structure
unprotected, and we can trigger oopses by accessing the inotify
instance from different tasks concurrently.

The best fix (contributed largely by Linus) is a total rewrite
of the function in question:

On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 7:05 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> The thing to notice is that:
>
>  - locking is done in just one place, and there is no question about it
>   not having an unlock.
>
>  - that whole double-while(1)-loop thing is gone.
>
>  - use multiple functions to make nesting and error handling sane
>
>  - do error testing after doing the things you always need to do, ie do
>   this:
>
>        mutex_lock(..)
>        ret = function_call();
>        mutex_unlock(..)
>
>        .. test ret here ..
>
>   instead of doing conditional exits with unlocking or freeing.
>
> So if the code is written in this way, it may still be buggy, but at least
> it's not buggy because of subtle "forgot to unlock" or "forgot to free"
> issues.
>
> This _always_ unlocks if it locked, and it always frees if it got a
> non-error kevent.

Cc: John McCutchan <ttb@tentacle.dhs.org>
Cc: Robert Love <rlove@google.com>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-01-26 10:08:05 -08:00
Heiko Carstens 2e4d0924eb [CVE-2009-0029] System call wrappers part 29
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
2009-01-14 14:15:30 +01:00
Heiko Carstens 938bb9f5e8 [CVE-2009-0029] System call wrappers part 28
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
2009-01-14 14:15:30 +01:00
Michael Kerrisk 4ae8978cf9 inotify: fix type errors in interfaces
The problems lie in the types used for some inotify interfaces, both at the kernel level and at the glibc level. This mail addresses the kernel problem. I will follow up with some suggestions for glibc changes.

For the sys_inotify_rm_watch() interface, the type of the 'wd' argument is
currently 'u32', it should be '__s32' .  That is Robert's suggestion, and
is consistent with the other declarations of watch descriptors in the
kernel source, in particular, the inotify_event structure in
include/linux/inotify.h:

struct inotify_event {
        __s32           wd;             /* watch descriptor */
        __u32           mask;           /* watch mask */
        __u32           cookie;         /* cookie to synchronize two events */
        __u32           len;            /* length (including nulls) of name */
        char            name[0];        /* stub for possible name */
};

The patch makes the changes needed for inotify_rm_watch().

Signed-off-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@googlemail.com>
Cc: Robert Love <rlove@google.com>
Cc: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>
Cc: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2009-01-05 11:54:29 -05:00
Eric Paris 272eb01485 filesystem notification: create fs/notify to contain all fs notification
Creating a generic filesystem notification interface, fsnotify, which will be
used by inotify, dnotify, and eventually fanotify is really starting to
clutter the fs directory.  This patch simply moves inotify and dnotify into
fs/notify/inotify and fs/notify/dnotify respectively to make both current fs/
and future notification tidier.

Signed-off-by: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2008-12-31 18:07:43 -05:00