Commit Graph

89 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Miao Xie 4245215d6a Btrfs, raid56: fix use-after-free problem in the final device replace procedure on raid56
The commit c404e0dc (Btrfs: fix use-after-free in the finishing
procedure of the device replace) fixed a use-after-free problem
which happened when removing the source device at the end of device
replace, but at that time, btrfs didn't support device replace
on raid56, so we didn't fix the problem on the raid56 profile.
Currently, we implemented device replace for raid56, so we need
kick that problem out before we enable that function for raid56.

The fix method is very simple, we just increase the bio per-cpu
counter before we submit a raid56 io, and decrease the counter
when the raid56 io ends.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
2014-12-03 10:18:47 +08:00
Qu Wenruo 084b6e7c76 btrfs: Fix a lockdep warning when running xfstest.
The following lockdep warning is triggered during xfstests:

[ 1702.980872] =========================================================
[ 1702.981181] [ INFO: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected ]
[ 1702.981482] 3.18.0-rc1 #27 Not tainted
[ 1702.981781] ---------------------------------------------------------
[ 1702.982095] kswapd0/77 just changed the state of lock:
[ 1702.982415]  (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.-.}, at: [<ffffffffa03b0b51>] __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x41/0x1f0 [btrfs]
[ 1702.982794] but this lock took another, RECLAIM_FS-unsafe lock in the past:
[ 1702.983160]  (&fs_info->dev_replace.lock){+.+.+.}

and interrupts could create inverse lock ordering between them.

[ 1702.984675]
other info that might help us debug this:
[ 1702.985524] Chain exists of:
  &delayed_node->mutex --> &found->groups_sem --> &fs_info->dev_replace.lock

[ 1702.986799]  Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario:

[ 1702.987681]        CPU0                    CPU1
[ 1702.988137]        ----                    ----
[ 1702.988598]   lock(&fs_info->dev_replace.lock);
[ 1702.989069]                                local_irq_disable();
[ 1702.989534]                                lock(&delayed_node->mutex);
[ 1702.990038]                                lock(&found->groups_sem);
[ 1702.990494]   <Interrupt>
[ 1702.990938]     lock(&delayed_node->mutex);
[ 1702.991407]
 *** DEADLOCK ***

It is because the btrfs_kobj_{add/rm}_device() will call memory
allocation with GFP_KERNEL,
which may flush fs page cache to free space, waiting for it self to do
the commit, causing the deadlock.

To solve the problem, move btrfs_kobj_{add/rm}_device() out of the
dev_replace lock range, also involing split the
btrfs_rm_dev_replace_srcdev() function into remove and free parts.

Now only btrfs_rm_dev_replace_remove_srcdev() is called in dev_replace
lock range, and kobj_{add/rm} and btrfs_rm_dev_replace_free_srcdev() are
called out of the lock range.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-11-25 05:55:38 -08:00
Eryu Guan 2fc9f6baa2 Btrfs: return failure if btrfs_dev_replace_finishing() failed
device replace could fail due to another running scrub process or any
other errors btrfs_scrub_dev() may hit, but this failure doesn't get
returned to userspace.

The following steps could reproduce this issue

	mkfs -t btrfs -f /dev/sdb1 /dev/sdb2
	mount /dev/sdb1 /mnt/btrfs
	while true; do btrfs scrub start -B /mnt/btrfs >/dev/null 2>&1; done &
	btrfs replace start -Bf /dev/sdb2 /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs
	# if this replace succeeded, do the following and repeat until
	# you see this log in dmesg
	# BTRFS: btrfs_scrub_dev(/dev/sdb2, 2, /dev/sdb3) failed -115
	#btrfs replace start -Bf /dev/sdb3 /dev/sdb2 /mnt/btrfs

	# once you see the error log in dmesg, check return value of
	# replace
	echo $?

Introduce a new dev replace result

BTRFS_IOCTL_DEV_REPLACE_RESULT_SCRUB_INPROGRESS

to catch -EINPROGRESS explicitly and return other errors directly to
userspace.

Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-11-20 17:14:28 -08:00
Miao Xie 82372bc816 Btrfs: make the logic of source device removing more clear
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-09-17 13:38:46 -07:00
Miao Xie 67a2c45ee7 Btrfs: fix use-after-free problem of the device during device replace
The problem is:
	Task0(device scan task)		Task1(device replace task)
	scan_one_device()
	mutex_lock(&uuid_mutex)
	device = find_device()
					mutex_lock(&device_list_mutex)
					lock_chunk()
					rm_and_free_source_device
					unlock_chunk()
					mutex_unlock(&device_list_mutex)
	check device

Destroying the target device if device replace fails also has the same problem.

We fix this problem by locking uuid_mutex during destroying source device or
target device, just like the device remove operation.

It is a temporary solution, we can fix this problem and make the code more
clear by atomic counter in the future.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-09-17 13:38:44 -07:00
Miao Xie 2196d6e8a7 Btrfs: Fix misuse of chunk mutex
There were several problems about chunk mutex usage:
- Lock chunk mutex when updating metadata. It would cause the nested
  deadlock because updating metadata might need allocate new chunks
  that need acquire chunk mutex. We remove chunk mutex at this case,
  because b-tree lock and other lock mechanism can help us.
- ABBA deadlock occured between device_list_mutex and chunk_mutex.
  When we update device status, we must acquire device_list_mutex at the
  beginning, and then we might get chunk_mutex during the device status
  update because we need allocate new chunks for metadata COW. But at
  most place, we acquire chunk_mutex at first and then acquire device list
  mutex. We need change the lock order.
- Some place we needn't acquire chunk_mutex. For example we needn't get
  chunk_mutex when we free a empty seed fs_devices structure.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-09-17 13:38:42 -07:00
Miao Xie 7cc8e58d53 Btrfs: fix unprotected device's variants on 32bits machine
->total_bytes,->disk_total_bytes,->bytes_used is protected by chunk
lock when we change them, but sometimes we read them without any lock,
and we might get unexpected value. We fix this problem like inode's
i_size.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-09-17 13:38:38 -07:00
Miao Xie ce7213c70c Btrfs: fix wrong device bytes_used in the super block
device->bytes_used will be changed when allocating a new chunk, and
disk_total_size will be changed if resizing is successful.
Meanwhile, the on-disk super blocks of the previous transaction
might not be updated. Considering the consistency of the metadata
in the previous transaction, We should use the size in the previous
transaction to check if the super block is beyond the boundary
of the device.

Though it is not big problem because we don't use it now, but anyway
it is better that we make it be consistent with the common metadata,
maybe we will use it in the future.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-09-17 13:38:34 -07:00
Miao Xie 935e5cc935 Btrfs: fix wrong disk size when writing super blocks
total_size will be changed when resizing a device, and disk_total_size
will be changed if resizing is successful. Meanwhile, the on-disk super
blocks of the previous transaction might not be updated. Considering
the consistency of the metadata in the previous transaction, We should
use the size in the previous transaction to check if the super block is
beyond the boundary of the device. Fix it.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-09-17 13:38:33 -07:00
Miao Xie 1c43366d3b Btrfs: fix unprotected assignment of the target device
We didn't protect the assignment of the target device, it might cause the
problem that the super block update was skipped because we might find wrong
size of the target device during the assignment. Fix it by moving the
assignment sentences into the initialization function of the target device.
And there is another merit that we can check if the target device is suitable
more early.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-09-17 13:38:31 -07:00
Miao Xie c7662111c7 Btrfs: cleanup double assignment of device->bytes_used when device replace finishes
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-09-17 13:38:30 -07:00
Qu Wenruo 12b894cb28 btrfs: Fix a deadlock in btrfs_dev_replace_finishing()
btrfs-transacion:5657
[stack snip]
btrfs_bio_map()
    btrfs_bio_counter_inc_blocked()
        percpu_counter_inc(&fs_info->bio_counter)  ###bio_counter > 0(A)
        __btrfs_bio_map()
            btrfs_dev_replace_lock()
                mutex_lock(dev_replace->lock)	   ###wait mutex(B)

btrfs:32612
[stack snip]
btrfs_dev_replace_start()
    btrfs_dev_replace_lock()
	mutex_lock(dev_replace->lock)		   ###hold mutex(B)
    btrfs_dev_replace_finishing()
        btrfs_rm_dev_replace_blocked()
            wait until percpu_counter_sum == 0	   ###wait on bio_counter(A)

This bug can be triggered quite easily by the following test script:
http://pastebin.com/MQmb37Cy

This patch will fix the ABBA problem by calling
btrfs_dev_replace_unlock() before btrfs_rm_dev_replace_blocked().

The consistency of btrfs devices list and their superblocks is protected
by device_list_mutex, not btrfs_dev_replace_lock/unlock().
So it is safe the move btrfs_dev_replace_unlock() before
btrfs_rm_dev_replace_blocked().

Reported-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-09-17 13:38:22 -07:00
Anand Jain de4c296f63 btrfs: fix typo in the log message
there is no matching open parenthesis for the closing parenthesis

Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-09-17 13:38:11 -07:00
Anand Jain 63dd86fa79 btrfs: fix rw_devices miss match after seed replace
reproducer:
    reproducer:
    mount /dev/sdb /btrfs
    btrfs dev add /dev/sdc /btrfs
    btrfs rep start -B /dev/sdb /dev/sdd /btrfs
    umount /btrfs

WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 3882 at fs/btrfs/volumes.c:892 __btrfs_close_devices+0x1c8/0x200 [btrfs]()

which is

        WARN_ON(fs_devices->rw_devices);

   The problem here is that we did not add one to the rw_devices when
   we replace the seed device with a writable device.

Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-09-17 13:38:06 -07:00
Anand Jain 49c6f736f3 btrfs: dev replace should replace the sysfs entry
when we replace the device its corresponding sysfs
entry has to be replaced as well

Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-06-28 13:48:44 -07:00
Gui Hecheng c81d57679e btrfs: replace EINVAL with EOPNOTSUPP for dev_replace raid56
To return EOPNOTSUPP is more user friendly than to return EINVAL,
and then user-space tool will show that the dev_replace operation
for raid56 is not currently supported rather than showing that
there is an invalid argument.

Signed-off-by: Gui Hecheng <guihc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-06-09 17:21:12 -07:00
Miao Xie 6c255e67ce Btrfs: don't flush all delalloc inodes when we doesn't get s_umount lock
We needn't flush all delalloc inodes when we doesn't get s_umount lock,
or we would make the tasks wait for a long time.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-03-10 15:17:27 -04:00
Miao Xie c404e0dc2c Btrfs: fix use-after-free in the finishing procedure of the device replace
During device replace test, we hit a null pointer deference (It was very easy
to reproduce it by running xfstests' btrfs/011 on the devices with the virtio
scsi driver). There were two bugs that caused this problem:
- We might allocate new chunks on the replaced device after we updated
  the mapping tree. And we forgot to replace the source device in those
  mapping of the new chunks.
- We might get the mapping information which including the source device
  before the mapping information update. And then submit the bio which was
  based on that mapping information after we freed the source device.

For the first bug, we can fix it by doing mapping tree update and source
device remove in the same context of the chunk mutex. The chunk mutex is
used to protect the allocable device list, the above method can avoid
the new chunk allocation, and after we remove the source device, all
the new chunks will be allocated on the new device. So it can fix
the first bug.

For the second bug, we need make sure all flighting bios are finished and
no new bios are produced during we are removing the source device. To fix
this problem, we introduced a global @bio_counter, we not only inc/dec
@bio_counter outsize of map_blocks, but also inc it before submitting bio
and dec @bio_counter when ending bios.

Since Raid56 is a little different and device replace dosen't support raid56
yet, it is not addressed in the patch and I add comments to make sure we will
fix it in the future.

Reported-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-03-10 15:15:39 -04:00
Miao Xie 391cd9df81 Btrfs: fix unprotected alloc list insertion during the finishing procedure of replace
the alloc list of the filesystem is protected by ->chunk_mutex, we need
get that mutex when we insert the new device into the list.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-03-10 15:15:38 -04:00
Frank Holton efe120a067 Btrfs: convert printk to btrfs_ and fix BTRFS prefix
Convert all applicable cases of printk and pr_* to the btrfs_* macros.

Fix all uses of the BTRFS prefix.

Signed-off-by: Frank Holton <fholton@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-28 13:20:05 -08:00
Anand Jain 52a1575921 btrfs: fix typo in the log message
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-11-20 20:44:47 -05:00
Miao Xie 91aef86f3b Btrfs: rename btrfs_start_all_delalloc_inodes
rename the function -- btrfs_start_all_delalloc_inodes(), and make its
name be compatible to btrfs_wait_ordered_roots(), since they are always
used at the same place.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-11-11 22:13:58 -05:00
Miao Xie b02441999e Btrfs: don't wait for the completion of all the ordered extents
It is very likely that there are lots of ordered extents in the filesytem,
if we wait for the completion of all of them when we want to reclaim some
space for the metadata space reservation, we would be blocked for a long
time. The performance would drop down suddenly for a long time.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-11-11 22:13:44 -05:00
Zach Brown 8b558c5f09 btrfs: remove fs/btrfs/compat.h
fs/btrfs/compat.h only contained trivial macro wrappers of drop_nlink()
and inc_nlink().  This doesn't belong in mainline.

Signed-off-by: Zach Brown <zab@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-11-11 22:03:19 -05:00
Zach Brown 4546bcaeba btrfs: use get_seconds() instead of btrfs wrapper
Signed-off-by: Zach Brown <zab@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-11-11 22:03:00 -05:00
Ilya Dryomov e649e587cb Btrfs: disallow 'btrfs {balance,replace} cancel' on ro mounts
For both balance and replace, cancelling involves changing the on-disk
state and committing a transaction, which is not a good thing to do on
read-only filesystems.

Cc: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-11-11 22:00:50 -05:00
Chris Mason 1329dfc8bb Merge branch 'for-linus' into for-linus-3.12 2013-10-05 10:51:32 -04:00
Ilya Dryomov 1357272fc7 Btrfs: fix a use-after-free bug in btrfs_dev_replace_finishing
free_device rcu callback, scheduled from btrfs_rm_dev_replace_srcdev,
can be processed before btrfs_scratch_superblock is called, which would
result in a use-after-free on btrfs_device contents.  Fix this by
zeroing the superblock before the rcu callback is registered.

Cc: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
2013-10-04 16:02:14 -04:00
Linus Torvalds 0fbf2cc983 Merge branch 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs
Pull btrfs fixes from Chris Mason:
 "These are mostly bug fixes and a two small performance fixes.  The
  most important of the bunch are Josef's fix for a snapshotting
  regression and Mark's update to fix compile problems on arm"

* 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs: (25 commits)
  Btrfs: create the uuid tree on remount rw
  btrfs: change extent-same to copy entire argument struct
  Btrfs: dir_inode_operations should use btrfs_update_time also
  btrfs: Add btrfs: prefix to kernel log output
  btrfs: refuse to remount read-write after abort
  Btrfs: btrfs_ioctl_default_subvol: Revert back to toplevel subvolume when arg is 0
  Btrfs: don't leak transaction in btrfs_sync_file()
  Btrfs: add the missing mutex unlock in write_all_supers()
  Btrfs: iput inode on allocation failure
  Btrfs: remove space_info->reservation_progress
  Btrfs: kill delay_iput arg to the wait_ordered functions
  Btrfs: fix worst case calculator for space usage
  Revert "Btrfs: rework the overcommit logic to be based on the total size"
  Btrfs: improve replacing nocow extents
  Btrfs: drop dir i_size when adding new names on replay
  Btrfs: replay dir_index items before other items
  Btrfs: check roots last log commit when checking if an inode has been logged
  Btrfs: actually log directory we are fsync()'ing
  Btrfs: actually limit the size of delalloc range
  Btrfs: allocate the free space by the existed max extent size when ENOSPC
  ...
2013-09-22 14:58:49 -07:00
Josef Bacik f0de181c9b Btrfs: kill delay_iput arg to the wait_ordered functions
This is a left over of how we used to wait for ordered extents, which was to
grab the inode and then run filemap flush on it.  However if we have an ordered
extent then we already are holding a ref on the inode, and we just use
btrfs_start_ordered_extent anyway, so there is no reason to have an extra ref on
the inode to start work on the ordered extent.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-09-21 11:05:27 -04:00
Linus Torvalds b7c09ad401 Merge branch 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs
Pull btrfs updates from Chris Mason:
 "This is against 3.11-rc7, but was pulled and tested against your tree
  as of yesterday.  We do have two small incrementals queued up, but I
  wanted to get this bunch out the door before I hop on an airplane.

  This is a fairly large batch of fixes, performance improvements, and
  cleanups from the usual Btrfs suspects.

  We've included Stefan Behren's work to index subvolume UUIDs, which is
  targeted at speeding up send/receive with many subvolumes or snapshots
  in place.  It closes a long standing performance issue that was built
  in to the disk format.

  Mark Fasheh's offline dedup work is also here.  In this case offline
  means the FS is mounted and active, but the dedup work is not done
  inline during file IO.  This is a building block where utilities are
  able to ask the FS to dedup a series of extents.  The kernel takes
  care of verifying the data involved really is the same.  Today this
  involves reading both extents, but we'll continue to evolve the
  patches"

* 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs: (118 commits)
  Btrfs: optimize key searches in btrfs_search_slot
  Btrfs: don't use an async starter for most of our workers
  Btrfs: only update disk_i_size as we remove extents
  Btrfs: fix deadlock in uuid scan kthread
  Btrfs: stop refusing the relocation of chunk 0
  Btrfs: fix memory leak of uuid_root in free_fs_info
  btrfs: reuse kbasename helper
  btrfs: return btrfs error code for dev excl ops err
  Btrfs: allow partial ordered extent completion
  Btrfs: convert all bug_ons in free-space-cache.c
  Btrfs: add support for asserts
  Btrfs: adjust the fs_devices->missing count on unmount
  Btrf: cleanup: don't check for root_refs == 0 twice
  Btrfs: fix for patch "cleanup: don't check the same thing twice"
  Btrfs: get rid of one BUG() in write_all_supers()
  Btrfs: allocate prelim_ref with a slab allocater
  Btrfs: pass gfp_t to __add_prelim_ref() to avoid always using GFP_ATOMIC
  Btrfs: fix race conditions in BTRFS_IOC_FS_INFO ioctl
  Btrfs: fix race between removing a dev and writing sbs
  Btrfs: remove ourselves from the cluster list under lock
  ...
2013-09-12 09:58:51 -07:00
Geert Uytterhoeven 6e71c47afe Btrfs: Make BTRFS_DEV_REPLACE_DEVID an unsigned long long constant
The internal btrfs device id is a u64, hence make the constant
BTRFS_DEV_REPLACE_DEVID "unsigned long long" as well, so we no longer need
a cast to print it.

Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-09-01 08:16:09 -04:00
Geert Uytterhoeven c1c9ff7c94 Btrfs: Remove superfluous casts from u64 to unsigned long long
u64 is "unsigned long long" on all architectures now, so there's no need to
cast it when formatting it using the "ll" length modifier.

Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-09-01 08:16:08 -04:00
Rusty Russell 8c6ffba0ed PTR_RET is now PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(): Replace most.
Sweep of the simple cases.

Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Acked-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
2013-07-15 11:25:01 +09:30
Miao Xie 199c2a9c3d Btrfs: introduce per-subvolume ordered extent list
The reason we introduce per-subvolume ordered extent list is the same
as the per-subvolume delalloc inode list.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
2013-06-14 11:29:41 -04:00
Miao Xie eb73c1b7ce Btrfs: introduce per-subvolume delalloc inode list
When we create a snapshot, we need flush all delalloc inodes in the
fs, just flushing the inodes in the source tree is OK. So we introduce
per-subvolume delalloc inode list.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
2013-06-14 11:29:40 -04:00
Stefan Behrens 4968810752 Btrfs: don't allow device replace on RAID5/RAID6
This is not yet supported and causes crashes. One sad user reported
that it destroyed his filesystem.

One failure is in __btrfs_map_block+0xc1f calling kmalloc(0).

0x5f21f is in __btrfs_map_block (fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4923).
4918                            num_stripes = map->num_stripes;
4919                            max_errors = nr_parity_stripes(map);
4920
4921                            raid_map = kmalloc(sizeof(u64) * num_stripes,
4922                                               GFP_NOFS);
4923                            if (!raid_map) {
4924                                    ret = -ENOMEM;
4925                                    goto out;
4926                            }
4927

There might be more issues. Until this is really tested, don't allow
users to start the procedure on RAID5/RAID6 filesystems.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
2013-05-17 21:40:16 -04:00
Miao Xie 3edb2a68cb Btrfs: check the return value of btrfs_start_delalloc_inodes()
We forget to check the return value of btrfs_start_delalloc_inodes(), fix it.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
2013-02-20 09:37:21 -05:00
Stefan Behrens e93c89c1aa Btrfs: add new sources for device replace code
This adds a new file to the sources together with the header file
and the changes to ioctl.h and ctree.h that are required by the
new C source file. Additionally, 4 new functions are added to
volume.c that deal with device creation and destruction.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2012-12-12 17:15:41 -05:00