Disabling gpe might interfere with gpe detection/handling,
thus producing "interrupt not handled" errors.
Ironically, disabling of GPE from interrupt context is already
under spinlock, so only userspace needs to start using it.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
* Introduce function acpi_pm_device_sleep_wake() for enabling and
disabling the system wake-up capability of devices that are power
manageable by ACPI.
* Introduce function acpi_bus_can_wakeup() allowing other (dependent)
subsystems to check if ACPI is able to enable the system wake-up
capability of given device.
* Introduce callback .sleep_wake() in struct pci_platform_pm_ops and
for the ACPI PCI 'driver' make it use acpi_pm_device_sleep_wake().
* Introduce callback .can_wakeup() in struct pci_platform_pm_ops and
for the ACPI 'driver' make it use acpi_bus_can_wakeup().
* Move the PME# handlig code out of pci_enable_wake() and split it
into two functions, pci_pme_capable() and pci_pme_active(),
allowing the caller to check if given device is capable of
generating PME# from given power state and to enable/disable the
device's PME# functionality, respectively.
* Modify pci_enable_wake() to use the new ACPI callbacks and the new
PME#-related functions.
* Drop the generic .platform_enable_wakeup() callback that is not
used any more.
* Introduce device_set_wakeup_capable() that will set the
power.can_wakeup flag of given device.
* Rework PCI device PM initialization so that, if given device is
capable of generating wake-up events, either natively through the
PME# mechanism, or with the help of the platform, its
power.can_wakeup flag is set and its power.should_wakeup flag is
unset as appropriate.
* Make ACPI set the power.can_wakeup flag for devices found to be
wake-up capable by it.
* Make the ACPI wake-up code enable/disable GPEs for devices that
have the wakeup.flags.prepared flag set (which means that their
wake-up power has been enabled).
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
The currect ACPI code attempts to execute _PSW at three different
places and in one of them only it tries to execute _DSW before _PSW,
which is inconsistent with the other two cases.
Move the execution of _DSW and _PSW into a separate function called
acpi_device_sleep_wake() and call it wherever appropriate instead of
executing _DSW and/or _PSW directly.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
S4 suspend to disk will disable GPE's permanently
because acpi_gpe_sleep_prepare() does not have
a counterpart at resume time. Thus, those devices
became unavailable for wakeup from subsequent
S3 suspend-to-ram.
Here acpi_gpe_sleep_prepare() is removed, and upon suspend
acpi_enable_wakeup_device() gets its functionality.
Upon resume, acpi_disable_wakeup_device() restores the state.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292300
Signed-off-by: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>
Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
As it was a synonym for (CONFIG_ACPI && CONFIG_X86),
the ifdefs for it were more clutter than they were worth.
For ia64, just add a few stubs in anticipation of future
S3 or S4 support.
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Fixing wrong description for acpi_gpe_sleep_prepare().
acpi_gpe_sleep_prepare() had only used on power off and was changed
to also used on entering some sleep state. However its description
isn't changed yet.
Signed-off-by: Satoru Takeuchi <takeuchi_satoru@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Internal BIOS names like these should be exposed
to the user as little as possible:
ACPI wakeup devices: C069 C0CE C1D1 C0DE C1D4
Eventually, the "wakeup" property of a device should be exported via the
device tree, not by a printk of an internal BIOS name. For the hard-core,
these are still available in /proc/acpi/wakeup_devices, just not
printed to dmesg.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4320
Signed-off-by: Alexey Starikovskiy <alexey.y.starikovskiy@intel.com>
Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.
Let it rip!
Alexey Starikovskiy