Raviu reported that running his regular fs_trim segfaulted with the
following backtrace:
[ 237.525947] assertion failed: prev, in ../fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1595
[ 237.525984] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 237.525985] kernel BUG at ../fs/btrfs/ctree.h:3117!
[ 237.525992] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
[ 237.525998] CPU: 4 PID: 4423 Comm: fstrim Tainted: G U OE 5.4.14-8-vanilla #1
[ 237.526001] Hardware name: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC.
[ 237.526044] RIP: 0010:assfail.constprop.58+0x18/0x1a [btrfs]
[ 237.526079] Call Trace:
[ 237.526120] find_first_clear_extent_bit+0x13d/0x150 [btrfs]
[ 237.526148] btrfs_trim_fs+0x211/0x3f0 [btrfs]
[ 237.526184] btrfs_ioctl_fitrim+0x103/0x170 [btrfs]
[ 237.526219] btrfs_ioctl+0x129a/0x2ed0 [btrfs]
[ 237.526227] ? filemap_map_pages+0x190/0x3d0
[ 237.526232] ? do_filp_open+0xaf/0x110
[ 237.526238] ? _copy_to_user+0x22/0x30
[ 237.526242] ? cp_new_stat+0x150/0x180
[ 237.526247] ? do_vfs_ioctl+0xa4/0x640
[ 237.526278] ? btrfs_ioctl_get_supported_features+0x30/0x30 [btrfs]
[ 237.526283] do_vfs_ioctl+0xa4/0x640
[ 237.526288] ? __do_sys_newfstat+0x3c/0x60
[ 237.526292] ksys_ioctl+0x70/0x80
[ 237.526297] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20
[ 237.526303] do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x1c0
[ 237.526310] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
That was due to btrfs_fs_device::aloc_tree being empty. Initially I
thought this wasn't possible and as a percaution have put the assert in
find_first_clear_extent_bit. Turns out this is indeed possible and could
happen when a file system with SINGLE data/metadata profile has a 2nd
device added. Until balance is run or a new chunk is allocated on this
device it will be completely empty.
In this case find_first_clear_extent_bit should return the full range
[0, -1ULL] and let the caller handle this i.e for trim the end will be
capped at the size of actual device.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/izW2WNyvy1dEDweBICizKnd2KDwDiDyY2EYQr4YCwk7pkuIpthx-JRn65MPBde00ND6V0_Lh8mW0kZwzDiLDv25pUYWxkskWNJnVP0kgdMA=@protonmail.com/
Fixes: 45bfcfc168 ("btrfs: Implement find_first_clear_extent_bit")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.2+
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
If any call to find_first_clear_extent_bit() returns an unexpected result,
the test should fail and not just print an error message, otherwise it
makes detection of regressions much harder to notice.
Fixes: 1eaebb341d ("btrfs: Don't trim returned range based on input value in find_first_clear_extent_bit")
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The test creates an extent io tree and sets several ranges with the
CHUNK_ALLOCATED and CHUNK_TRIMMED bits, resulting in the allocation of
several extent state structures. However the test never clears those
ranges, resulting in memory leaks of the extent state structures.
This is detected when CONFIG_BTRFS_DEBUG is set once we remove the
btrfs module (rmmod btrfs):
[57399.787918] BTRFS: state leak: start 67108864 end 75497471 state 1 in tree 1 refs 1
[57399.790155] BTRFS: state leak: start 33554432 end 67108863 state 33 in tree 1 refs 1
[57399.791941] BTRFS: state leak: start 1048576 end 4194303 state 33 in tree 1 refs 1
[57399.793753] BTRFS: state leak: start 67108864 end 75497471 state 1 in tree 1 refs 1
[57399.795188] BTRFS: state leak: start 33554432 end 67108863 state 33 in tree 1 refs 1
[57399.796453] BTRFS: state leak: start 1048576 end 4194303 state 33 in tree 1 refs 1
[57399.797765] BTRFS: state leak: start 67108864 end 75497471 state 1 in tree 1 refs 1
[57399.799049] BTRFS: state leak: start 33554432 end 67108863 state 33 in tree 1 refs 1
[57399.800142] BTRFS: state leak: start 1048576 end 4194303 state 33 in tree 1 refs 1
[57399.801126] BTRFS: state leak: start 67108864 end 75497471 state 1 in tree 1 refs 1
[57399.802106] BTRFS: state leak: start 33554432 end 67108863 state 33 in tree 1 refs 1
[57399.803119] BTRFS: state leak: start 1048576 end 4194303 state 33 in tree 1 refs 1
[57399.804153] BTRFS: state leak: start 67108864 end 75497471 state 1 in tree 1 refs 1
[57399.805196] BTRFS: state leak: start 33554432 end 67108863 state 33 in tree 1 refs 1
[57399.806191] BTRFS: state leak: start 1048576 end 4194303 state 33 in tree 1 refs 1
The start and end offsets reported correspond exactly to the ranges
used by the test.
So fix that by clearing all the ranges when the test finishes.
Fixes: 1eaebb341d ("btrfs: Don't trim returned range based on input value in find_first_clear_extent_bit")
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Simplification. No point passing the tree variable when it can be
evaluated from inode. The tests now use the io_tree from btrfs_inode as
opposed to creating one.
Signed-off-by: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Currently find_first_clear_extent_bit always returns a range whose
starting value is >= passed 'start'. This implicit trimming behavior is
somewhat subtle and an implementation detail.
Instead, this patch modifies the function such that now it always
returns the range which contains passed 'start' and has the given bits
unset. This range could either be due to presence of existing records
which contains 'start' but have the bits unset or because there are no
records that contain the given starting offset.
This patch also adds test cases which cover find_first_clear_extent_bit
since they were missing up until now.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The messages like 'extent I/O tests finished' are redundant, if the test
fails it's quite obvious in the log and hang is also noticeable. No
other then extent_io and free space tree tests print that so make it
consistent.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The fs_info is not freed at the end of the function and leaks. The
function is called twice so there can be up to 2x sizeof(struct
btrfs_fs_info) of leaked memory. Fortunatelly this affects only testing
builds, the size could be 16k with several debugging features enabled.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Btrfs has the following different extent_io_trees used:
- fs_info::free_extents[2]
- btrfs_inode::io_tree - for both normal inodes and the btree inode
- btrfs_inode::io_failure_tree
- btrfs_transaction::dirty_pages
- btrfs_root::dirty_log_pages
If we want to trace changes in those trees, it will be pretty hard to
distinguish them.
Instead of using hard-to-read pointer address, this patch will introduce
a new member extent_io_tree::owner to track the owner.
This modification needs all the callers of extent_io_tree_init() to
accept a new parameter @owner.
This patch provides the basis for later trace events.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This patch will add a new member fs_info to extent_io_tree.
This provides the basis for later trace events to distinguish the output
between different btrfs filesystems. While this increases the size of
the structure, we want to know the source of the trace events and
passing the fs_info as an argument to all contexts is not possible.
The selftests are now allowed to set it to NULL as they don't use the
tracepoints.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The @found is always false when it comes to the if branch. Besides, the
bool type is more suitable for @found. Change the return value of the
function and its caller to bool as well.
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Several functions in BTRFS are only used inside the source file they are
declared if CONFIG_BTRFS_FS_RUN_SANITY_TESTS is not defined. However if
CONFIG_BTRFS_FS_RUN_SANITY_TESTS is defined these functions are shared
with the unit tests code.
Before the introduction of the EXPORT_FOR_TESTS macro, these functions
could not be declared as static and the compiler had a harder task when
optimizing and inlining them.
As we have EXPORT_FOR_TESTS now, use it where appropriate to support the
compiler.
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
All callers of this function pass BTRFS_MAX_EXTENT_SIZE (128M) so let's
reduce the argument count and make that a local variable. No functional
changes.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
In extent-io self test, we need 2 ordered extents at its maximum size to
do the test.
Instead of using the intermediate numbers, use BTRFS_MAX_EXTENT_SIZE for
@max_bytes, and twice @max_bytes for @total_dirty. This should explain
why we need all these magic numbers and prevent people to modify them by
accident.
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This callback is used to properly account delalloc extents for data
inodes (ordinary file inodes and freespace v1 inodes). Those can be
easily identified since they have their extent_io trees ->private_data
member point to the inode. Let's exploit this fact to remove the
needless indirection through extent_io_hooks and directly call the
function. Also give the function a name which reflects its purpose -
btrfs_set_delalloc_extent.
This patch also modified test_find_delalloc so that the extent_io_tree
used for testing doesn't have its ->private_data set which would have
caused a crash in btrfs_set_delalloc_extent due to the btrfs_inode->root
member not being initialised. The old version of the code also didn't
call set_bit_hook since the extent_io ops weren't set for the inode. No
functional changes.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The helper find_lock_delalloc_range is now conditionally built static,
dpending on whether the self-tests are enabled or not. There's a macro
that is supposed to hide the export, used only once. To discourage
further use, drop it an add a public wrapper for the helper needed by
tests.
Reviewed-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The test failures are not clearly visible in the system log as they're
printed at INFO level. Add a new helper that is level ERROR. As this
touches almost all strings, I took the opportunity to unify them:
- decapitalize the first letter as there's a prefix and the text
continues after ":"
- glue strings split to more lines and un-indent so they fit to 80
columns
- use %llu instead of %Lu
- drop \n from the modified messages (test_msg is left untouched)
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Remove GPL boilerplate text (long, short, one-line) and keep the rest,
ie. personal, company or original source copyright statements. Add the
SPDX header.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The patch from commit a7e3b975a0 ("Btrfs: fix reported number of inode
blocks") introduced a regression where if we do a buffered write starting
at position equal to or greater than the file's size and then stat(2) the
file before writeback is triggered, the number of used blocks does not
change (unless there's a prealloc/unwritten extent). Example:
$ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xab 0 64K" foobar
$ du -h foobar
0 foobar
$ sync
$ du -h foobar
64K foobar
The first version of that patch didn't had this regression and the second
version, which was the one committed, was made only to address some
performance regression detected by the intel test robots using fs_mark.
This fixes the regression by setting the new delaloc bit in the range, and
doing it at btrfs_dirty_pages() while setting the regular dealloc bit as
well, so that this way we set both bits at once avoiding navigation of the
inode's io tree twice. Doing it at btrfs_dirty_pages() is also the most
meaninful place, as we should set the new dellaloc bit when if we set the
delalloc bit, which happens only if we copied bytes into the pages at
__btrfs_buffered_write().
This was making some of LTP's du tests fail, which can be quickly run
using a command line like the following:
$ ./runltp -q -p -l /ltp.log -f commands -s du -d /mnt
Fixes: a7e3b975a0 ("Btrfs: fix reported number of inode blocks")
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
For extent_io tree's we have carried the address_mapping of the inode
around in the io tree in order to pull the inode back out for calling
into various tree ops hooks. This works fine when everything that has
an extent_io_tree has an inode. But we are going to remove the
btree_inode, so we need to change this. Instead just have a generic
void * for private data that we can initialize with, and have all the
tree ops use that instead. This had a lot of cascading changes but
should be relatively straightforward.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ minor reordering of the callback prototypes ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We track the node sizes per-root, but they never vary from the values
in the superblock. This patch messes with the 80-column style a bit,
but subsequent patches to factor out root->fs_info into a convenience
variable fix it up again.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The only memset we do is to 0, so sink the parameter to the function and
simplify all calls. Rename the function to reflect the behaviour.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The in-memory bitmap code manipulates words and is therefore sensitive
to endianness, while the extent buffer bitmap code addresses bytes and
is byte-order agnostic. Because the byte addressing of the extent buffer
bitmaps is equivalent to a little-endian in-memory bitmap, the extent
buffer bitmap tests fail on big-endian systems.
34b3e6c92a ("Btrfs: self-tests: Fix extent buffer bitmap test fail on
BE system") worked around another endianness bug in the tests but missed
this one because ed9e4afdb0 ("Btrfs: self-tests: Execute page
straddling test only when nodesize < PAGE_SIZE") disables this part of
the test on ppc64. That change lost the original meaning of the test,
however. We really want to test that an equivalent series of operations
using the in-memory bitmap API and the extent buffer bitmap API produces
equivalent results.
To fix this, don't use memcmp_extent_buffer() or write_extent_buffer();
do everything bit-by-bit.
Reported-by: Anatoly Pugachev <matorola@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Anatoly Pugachev <matorola@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Feifei Xu <xufeifei@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
In __test_eb_bitmaps(), we write random data to a bitmap. Then copy
the bitmap to another bitmap that resides inside an extent buffer.
Later we verify the values of corresponding bits in the bitmap and the
bitmap inside the extent buffer. However, extent_buffer_test_bit()
reads in byte granularity while test_bit() reads in unsigned long
granularity. Hence we end up comparing wrong bits on big-endian
systems such as ppc64. This commit fixes the issue by reading the
bitmap in byte granularity.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Feifei Xu <xufeifei@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
On ppc64, PAGE_SIZE is 64k which is same as BTRFS_MAX_METADATA_BLOCKSIZE.
In such a scenario, we will never be able to have an extent buffer
containing more than one page. Hence in such cases this commit does not
execute the page straddling tests.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Feifei Xu <xufeifei@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
self-tests code assumes 4k as the sectorsize and nodesize. This commit
fix hardcoded 4K. Enables the self-tests code to be executed on non-4k
page sized systems (e.g. ppc64).
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Feifei Xu <xufeifei@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Callers pass GFP_NOFS and tests pass GFP_KERNEL, but using NOFS there
does not hurt. No need to pass the flags around.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Mostly direct substitution with occasional adjustment or removing
outdated comments.
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time
ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page
cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE.
This promise never materialized. And unlikely will.
We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to
PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether
PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case,
especially on the border between fs and mm.
Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much
breakage to be doable.
Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are
not.
The changes are pretty straight-forward:
- <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
- <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
- PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN};
- page_cache_get() -> get_page();
- page_cache_release() -> put_page();
This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using
script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files.
I've called spatch for them manually.
The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to
PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later.
There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll
fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also
will be addressed with the separate patch.
virtual patch
@@
expression E;
@@
- E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E
@@
expression E;
@@
- E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT
+ PAGE_SHIFT
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SIZE
+ PAGE_SIZE
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_MASK
+ PAGE_MASK
@@
expression E;
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E)
+ PAGE_ALIGN(E)
@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_get(E)
+ get_page(E)
@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_release(E)
+ put_page(E)
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
There's no reason to do GFP_NOFS in tests, it's not data-heavy and
memory allocation failures would affect only developers or testers.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We use many constants to represent size and offset value. And to make
code readable we use '256 * 1024 * 1024' instead of '268435456' to
represent '256MB'. However we can make far more readable with 'SZ_256MB'
which is defined in the 'linux/sizes.h'.
So this patch replaces 'xxx * 1024 * 1024' kind of expression with
single 'SZ_xxxMB' if 'xxx' is a power of 2 then 'xxx * SZ_1M' if 'xxx' is
not a power of 2. And I haven't touched to '4096' & '8192' because it's
more intuitive than 'SZ_4KB' & 'SZ_8KB'.
Signed-off-by: Byongho Lee <bhlee.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Sanity test the extent buffer bitmap operations (test, set, and clear)
against the equivalent standard kernel operations.
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Currently there's a 4B hole in the structure between refs and state and there
are only 16 bits used so we can make it unsigned. This will get a better
packing and may save some stack space for local variables.
The size of extent_state gets reduced by 8B and there are usually a lot
of slab objects.
struct extent_state {
u64 start; /* 0 8 */
u64 end; /* 8 8 */
struct rb_node rb_node; /* 16 24 */
wait_queue_head_t wq; /* 40 24 */
/* --- cacheline 1 boundary (64 bytes) --- */
atomic_t refs; /* 64 4 */
/* XXX 4 bytes hole, try to pack */
long unsigned int state; /* 72 8 */
u64 private; /* 80 8 */
/* size: 88, cachelines: 2, members: 7 */
/* sum members: 84, holes: 1, sum holes: 4 */
/* last cacheline: 24 bytes */
};
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
So both Liu and I made huge messes of find_lock_delalloc_range trying to fix
stuff, me first by fixing extent size, then him by fixing something I broke and
then me again telling him to fix it a different way. So this is obviously a
candidate for some testing. This patch adds a pseudo fs so we can allocate fake
inodes for tests that need an inode or pages. Then it addes a bunch of tests to
make sure find_lock_delalloc_range is acting the way it is supposed to. With
this patch and all of our previous patches to find_lock_delalloc_range I am sure
it is working as expected now. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Nikolay Borisov