drm_minor_alloc() does multiplication on this enum, so the removal
ended up moving render nodes down from 128 base to 64. This caused
Mesa's surfaceless backend to be unable to open the render nodes,
since it was still looking up at 128.
v2: Add a comment warning the next person.
Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
Fixes: 0d49f303e8 ("drm: remove all control node code")
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180509001425.12574-1-eric@anholt.net
To enable aspect-ratio support in DRM, blindly exposing the aspect
ratio information along with mode, can break things in existing
non-atomic user-spaces which have no intention or support to use this
aspect ratio information.
To avoid this, a new drm client cap is required to enable a non-atomic
user-space to advertise if it supports modes with aspect-ratio. Based
on this cap value, the kernel will take a call on exposing the aspect
ratio info in modes or not.
This patch adds the client cap for aspect-ratio.
Since no atomic-userspaces blow up on receiving aspect-ratio
information, the client cap for aspect-ratio is always enabled
for atomic clients.
Cc: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sharma@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
V3: rebase
V4: As suggested by Marteen Lankhorst modified the commit message
explaining the need to use the DRM cap for aspect-ratio. Also,
tweaked the comment lines in the code for better understanding and
clarity, as recommended by Shashank Sharma.
V5: rebase
V6: rebase
V7: rebase
V8: rebase
V9: rebase
V10: rebase
V11: rebase
V12: As suggested by Daniel Vetter and Ville Syrjala,
always enable aspect-ratio client cap for atomic userspaces,
if no atomic userspace breaks on aspect-ratio bits.
V13: rebase
V14: rebase
Reviewed-by: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sharma@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1525777785-9740-7-git-send-email-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com
With the ioctl and driver prep done, we can remove everything else.
Reviewed-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Cc: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@padovan.org>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180420065159.4531-4-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
Sync objects are new toplevel drm object, that contain a
pointer to a fence. This fence can be updated via command
submission ioctls via drivers.
There is also a generic wait obj API modelled on the vulkan
wait API (with code modelled on some amdgpu code).
These objects can be converted to an opaque fd that can be
passes between processes.
v2: rename reference/unreference to put/get (Chris)
fix leaked reference (David Zhou)
drop mutex in favour of cmpxchg (Chris)
v3: cleanups from danvet, rebase on drm_fops rename
check fd_flags is 0 in ioctls.
v4: export find/free, change replace fence to take a
syncobj. In order to support lookup first, replace
later semantics which seem in the end to be cleaner.
Reviewed-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
drm_irq.c contains both the irq helper library (optional) and the
vblank support (optional, but part of the modeset uapi, and doesn't
require the use of the irq helpers at all.
Split this up for more clarity of the scope of the individual bits.
v2: Move misplaced hunks to this patch (Stefan).
Cc: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170531092146.12528-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
Well, mostly drm_file.h, and clean up all related things:
- I didnt' figure out the difference between preclose and postclose.
The existing explanation in drm-internals.rst didn't convince me,
since it's also really outdated - we clean up pending DRM events in
the core nowadays. I put a FIXME in for the future.
- Another FIXME is to have a macro for default fops.
- Lots of links all around, main areas are to tie the overview in
drm_file.c more into the callbacks in struct drm_device, and the
other is to link render/primary node code to the right sections in
drm-uapi.rst.
- Also moved the open/close stuff to drm_drv.h from drm-internals.rst,
seems like the better place for that information. Since that section
was rather outdated this amounted to full-on rewrite.
A big missing piece here is some overview graph, but I think better to
wait with that one until drm_device and drm_driver are also fully
documented.
v2: Nits from Sean.
Reviewed-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170308141257.12119-12-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
We might as well dump the drm_file pointer, that's about as useful
a cookie as the pid. Noticed while typing docs for drm_file and friends.
Since the only consumer of this is the tracepoints I think we can safely
change this - those tracepoints should not be uapi relevant at all. It
all goes back to
commit b9c2c9ae88
Author: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Date: Thu Jul 1 16:48:09 2010 -0700
drm: add per-event vblank event trace points
which doesn't give a special justification for using pid over a pointer.
Also note that the nouveau code setting it is entirely pointless:
Since this isn't a vblank event, it will never hit the vblank
tracepoints.
Cc: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170308141257.12119-11-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
I'm torn on whether drm_minor really should be here or somewhere else.
Maybe with more clarity after untangling drmP.h more this is easier to
decide, for now I've put a FIXME comment right next to it. Right now
we need struct drm_minor for the inline drm_file type helpers, and so
it does kinda make sense to have them here.
Next patch will kerneldoc-ify the entire pile.
Reviewed-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170308141257.12119-10-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
Eric Anholt