This patch fixes 5 style problems reported by checkpatch:
WARNING: suspect code indent for conditional statements (8, 24)
#492: FILE: drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c:492:
+ if (phydev->link)
+ reg |= PORT_PCS_CTRL_LINK_UP;
CHECK: Logical continuations should be on the previous line
#1318: FILE: drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c:1318:
+ oldstate == PORT_CONTROL_STATE_FORWARDING)
+ && (state == PORT_CONTROL_STATE_DISABLED ||
CHECK: multiple assignments should be avoided
#1662: FILE: drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c:1662:
+ vlan->vid_begin = vlan->vid_end = next.vid;
WARNING: line over 80 characters
#2097: FILE: drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c:2097:
+ const struct switchdev_obj_port_vlan *vlan,
WARNING: suspect code indent for conditional statements (16, 32)
#2734: FILE: drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c:2734:
+ if (mv88e6xxx_6352_family(ps) || mv88e6xxx_6351_family(ps) ||
[...]
+ reg |= PORT_CONTROL_EGRESS_ADD_TAG;
total: 0 errors, 3 warnings, 2 checks, 3805 lines checked
It also rebases and integrates changes sent by Ben Dooks [1]:
The driver has a number of functions that are not exported or
declared elsewhere, so make them static to avoid the following
warnings from sparse:
drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c:113:5: warning: symbol 'mv88e6xxx_reg_read' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c:167:5: warning: symbol 'mv88e6xxx_reg_write' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c:231:5: warning: symbol 'mv88e6xxx_set_addr' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c:367:6: warning: symbol 'mv88e6xxx_ppu_state_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c:3157:5: warning: symbol 'mv88e6xxx_phy_page_read' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c:3169:5: warning: symbol 'mv88e6xxx_phy_page_write' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c:3583:26: warning: symbol 'mv88e6xxx_switch_driver' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c:3621:5: warning: symbol 'mv88e6xxx_probe' was not declared. Should it be static?
[1] http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/632708/
Signed-off-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
57d3231057