The Openembedded Layer Index [1] shows that python-six in
version 1.10.0 is already provided in the openembedded-core layer
and in the meta-python layer, so there is no need for a third copy
of the python-six recipe in meta-ros.
The recipe python-six is provided since commit a36869c7 in the
meta-openembedded repository (commit date: 2015-04-13), and
is provided since commit 9979e35f in the openembedded-core
repository (commit date: 2016-07-20).
In my opinion, at least the commit a36869c7 is far enough in the
past, so that we can safely assume that all new meta-ros use a setup
where python-six is included at least in meta-python.
For users of older versions, we include a remark in the README.md to
allow `git blame` to pinpoint to this commit here.
[1] https://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/branch/master/recipes/?q=python-six
[2] http://cgit.openembedded.org/meta-openembedded/commit/?id=a36869c700bed940f7f0aa4b9703ae630dc84eac
[3] http://cgit.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/?id=9979e35ffb0dfb20d8aaffa8e2ec5e33f27fc009
Signed-off-by: Lukas.Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@oss.bmw-carit.de>
The recent versions of the rosbridge_library package does not depend
on python-pytz anymore. So, this commit removes the dependency in
the recipe file and removes the now unneeded python-pytz recipe.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@oss.bmw-carit.de>
This commit adds recipes for rosbridge_suite and its dependencies.
Its main content is based on the commits of pull request #364 by
Christoph Schultz.
As maintainer, Lukas Bulwahn just included the contributions
with a proper commit message, added the new packages to the
packagegroup-ros-world, and slightly improved the line breaking.
The resource_retriever package's source was moved into
its own repository, and needs now python-urlgrabber.
Hence, this commit provides the recipe for python-urlgrabber, moves
the resource-retriever to its own location, and updates all other
packages in the robot_model repository.
Due to the recent commit 6eddc9e2@openembedded-core [1], which
updated python-nose from 1.2.1 to 1.3.6, the bbappend for
python-nose 1.2.1 leads to an error during parsing. Instead of
making the bbappend version-independent, this commit simply drops
the bbappend file, as python-nose is provided as native package
already since 78711c88@openembedded-core [2] (since January 2014).
[1] 6eddc9e222
[2] 78711c8875
Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@oss.bmw-carit.de>
When compiling python-rosdep before python-nose has been built,
'bitbake python-rosdep' fails with:
| distutils.errors.DistutilsError: Could not find suitable distribution for Requirement.parse('nose>=1.0')
| ERROR: python setup.py build_ext execution failed.
| WARNING: /[...]/build/tmp-glibc/work/i586-oe-linux/python-rosdep/0.11.0-r0/temp/run.do_compile.14813:1 exit 1 from
| exit 1
| ERROR: Function failed: do_compile (log file is located at /[...]/build/tmp-glibc/work/i586-oe-linux/python-rosdep/0.11.0-r0/temp/log.do_compile.14813)
ERROR: Task 6 (/[...]/meta-ros/recipes-devtools/python/python-rosdep_0.11.0.bb, do_compile) failed with exit code '1'
In a recent commit in the rosdep repository [1], the dependency for
the rosdep setup on python's nose package is added. Hence, we must
also add this dependency in the rosdep recipe, which then resolves
the reported failure.
[1] fc8b56be07
Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@oss.bmw-carit.de>
To compile nodelet-topic-tools, we must provide a working
dynamic-reconfigure in the native sysroot. This requires
some adjustments to the native versions of the required
python modules.
In particular, the following tasks ran successfully for this
commit:
This command tests compiling rospack-native:
rm bitbake.lock cache/ sstate-cache/ tmp-eglibc/ -rf && bitbake rospack-native
This command tests compiling roslib-native:
rm bitbake.lock cache/ sstate-cache/ tmp-eglibc/ -rf && bitbake roslib-native
As nodelet-topic-tools uses rospack-native and roslib-native to
some extent (dependency: rospack-native -> roslib-native ->
dynamic-reconfigure-native -> nodelet-topic-tools), this command
tests running rospack-native and roslib-native:
rm bitbake.lock cache/ sstate-cache/ tmp-eglibc/ -rf && bitbake nodelet-topic-tools
This command tests compiling rospack and roslib:
rm bitbake.lock cache/ sstate-cache/ tmp-eglibc/ -rf && bitbake rospack
rm bitbake.lock cache/ sstate-cache/ tmp-eglibc/ -rf && bitbake roslib
All these command run with this commit without errors, and
future commits to these files should keep them run without
errors or justify modifications with better tests.
A minor open issue related to rospack is issue #116
(cf. https://github.com/bmwcarit/meta-ros/issues/116).
This commit incorporates feedback from Stefan Herbrechtsmeier.
The current catkin requires catkin_pkg >= 0.1.12 as indicated in
https://github.com/ros/catkin/blob/groovy-devel/package.xml.
See discussion in #99.
lb: minor tweaking and commit message rewording
Signed-off-by: Víctor Mayoral Vilches <v.mayoralv@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@oss.bmw-carit.de>
Lukas Bulwahn