linux/net/bpf/test_run.c

769 lines
18 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
/* Copyright (c) 2017 Facebook
*/
#include <linux/bpf.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/vmalloc.h>
#include <linux/etherdevice.h>
#include <linux/filter.h>
#include <linux/sched/signal.h>
bpf: Introduce bpf sk local storage After allowing a bpf prog to - directly read the skb->sk ptr - get the fullsock bpf_sock by "bpf_sk_fullsock()" - get the bpf_tcp_sock by "bpf_tcp_sock()" - get the listener sock by "bpf_get_listener_sock()" - avoid duplicating the fields of "(bpf_)sock" and "(bpf_)tcp_sock" into different bpf running context. this patch is another effort to make bpf's network programming more intuitive to do (together with memory and performance benefit). When bpf prog needs to store data for a sk, the current practice is to define a map with the usual 4-tuples (src/dst ip/port) as the key. If multiple bpf progs require to store different sk data, multiple maps have to be defined. Hence, wasting memory to store the duplicated keys (i.e. 4 tuples here) in each of the bpf map. [ The smallest key could be the sk pointer itself which requires some enhancement in the verifier and it is a separate topic. ] Also, the bpf prog needs to clean up the elem when sk is freed. Otherwise, the bpf map will become full and un-usable quickly. The sk-free tracking currently could be done during sk state transition (e.g. BPF_SOCK_OPS_STATE_CB). The size of the map needs to be predefined which then usually ended-up with an over-provisioned map in production. Even the map was re-sizable, while the sk naturally come and go away already, this potential re-size operation is arguably redundant if the data can be directly connected to the sk itself instead of proxy-ing through a bpf map. This patch introduces sk->sk_bpf_storage to provide local storage space at sk for bpf prog to use. The space will be allocated when the first bpf prog has created data for this particular sk. The design optimizes the bpf prog's lookup (and then optionally followed by an inline update). bpf_spin_lock should be used if the inline update needs to be protected. BPF_MAP_TYPE_SK_STORAGE: ----------------------- To define a bpf "sk-local-storage", a BPF_MAP_TYPE_SK_STORAGE map (new in this patch) needs to be created. Multiple BPF_MAP_TYPE_SK_STORAGE maps can be created to fit different bpf progs' needs. The map enforces BTF to allow printing the sk-local-storage during a system-wise sk dump (e.g. "ss -ta") in the future. The purpose of a BPF_MAP_TYPE_SK_STORAGE map is not for lookup/update/delete a "sk-local-storage" data from a particular sk. Think of the map as a meta-data (or "type") of a "sk-local-storage". This particular "type" of "sk-local-storage" data can then be stored in any sk. The main purposes of this map are mostly: 1. Define the size of a "sk-local-storage" type. 2. Provide a similar syscall userspace API as the map (e.g. lookup/update, map-id, map-btf...etc.) 3. Keep track of all sk's storages of this "type" and clean them up when the map is freed. sk->sk_bpf_storage: ------------------ The main lookup/update/delete is done on sk->sk_bpf_storage (which is a "struct bpf_sk_storage"). When doing a lookup, the "map" pointer is now used as the "key" to search on the sk_storage->list. The "map" pointer is actually serving as the "type" of the "sk-local-storage" that is being requested. To allow very fast lookup, it should be as fast as looking up an array at a stable-offset. At the same time, it is not ideal to set a hard limit on the number of sk-local-storage "type" that the system can have. Hence, this patch takes a cache approach. The last search result from sk_storage->list is cached in sk_storage->cache[] which is a stable sized array. Each "sk-local-storage" type has a stable offset to the cache[] array. In the future, a map's flag could be introduced to do cache opt-out/enforcement if it became necessary. The cache size is 16 (i.e. 16 types of "sk-local-storage"). Programs can share map. On the program side, having a few bpf_progs running in the networking hotpath is already a lot. The bpf_prog should have already consolidated the existing sock-key-ed map usage to minimize the map lookup penalty. 16 has enough runway to grow. All sk-local-storage data will be removed from sk->sk_bpf_storage during sk destruction. bpf_sk_storage_get() and bpf_sk_storage_delete(): ------------------------------------------------ Instead of using bpf_map_(lookup|update|delete)_elem(), the bpf prog needs to use the new helper bpf_sk_storage_get() and bpf_sk_storage_delete(). The verifier can then enforce the ARG_PTR_TO_SOCKET argument. The bpf_sk_storage_get() also allows to "create" new elem if one does not exist in the sk. It is done by the new BPF_SK_STORAGE_GET_F_CREATE flag. An optional value can also be provided as the initial value during BPF_SK_STORAGE_GET_F_CREATE. The BPF_MAP_TYPE_SK_STORAGE also supports bpf_spin_lock. Together, it has eliminated the potential use cases for an equivalent bpf_map_update_elem() API (for bpf_prog) in this patch. Misc notes: ---------- 1. map_get_next_key is not supported. From the userspace syscall perspective, the map has the socket fd as the key while the map can be shared by pinned-file or map-id. Since btf is enforced, the existing "ss" could be enhanced to pretty print the local-storage. Supporting a kernel defined btf with 4 tuples as the return key could be explored later also. 2. The sk->sk_lock cannot be acquired. Atomic operations is used instead. e.g. cmpxchg is done on the sk->sk_bpf_storage ptr. Please refer to the source code comments for the details in synchronization cases and considerations. 3. The mem is charged to the sk->sk_omem_alloc as the sk filter does. Benchmark: --------- Here is the benchmark data collected by turning on the "kernel.bpf_stats_enabled" sysctl. Two bpf progs are tested: One bpf prog with the usual bpf hashmap (max_entries = 8192) with the sk ptr as the key. (verifier is modified to support sk ptr as the key That should have shortened the key lookup time.) Another bpf prog is with the new BPF_MAP_TYPE_SK_STORAGE. Both are storing a "u32 cnt", do a lookup on "egress_skb/cgroup" for each egress skb and then bump the cnt. netperf is used to drive data with 4096 connected UDP sockets. BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH with a modifier verifier (152ns per bpf run) 27: cgroup_skb name egress_sk_map tag 74f56e832918070b run_time_ns 58280107540 run_cnt 381347633 loaded_at 2019-04-15T13:46:39-0700 uid 0 xlated 344B jited 258B memlock 4096B map_ids 16 btf_id 5 BPF_MAP_TYPE_SK_STORAGE in this patch (66ns per bpf run) 30: cgroup_skb name egress_sk_stora tag d4aa70984cc7bbf6 run_time_ns 25617093319 run_cnt 390989739 loaded_at 2019-04-15T13:47:54-0700 uid 0 xlated 168B jited 156B memlock 4096B map_ids 17 btf_id 6 Here is a high-level picture on how are the objects organized: sk ┌──────┐ │ │ │ │ │ │ │*sk_bpf_storage─────▶ bpf_sk_storage └──────┘ ┌───────┐ ┌───────────┤ list │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ └───────┘ │ │ elem │ ┌────────┐ ├─▶│ snode │ │ ├────────┤ │ │ data │ bpf_map │ ├────────┤ ┌─────────┐ │ │map_node│◀─┬─────┤ list │ │ └────────┘ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ elem │ │ │ │ ┌────────┐ │ └─────────┘ └─▶│ snode │ │ ├────────┤ │ bpf_map │ data │ │ ┌─────────┐ ├────────┤ │ │ list ├───────▶│map_node│ │ │ │ └────────┘ │ │ │ │ │ │ elem │ └─────────┘ ┌────────┐ │ ┌─▶│ snode │ │ │ ├────────┤ │ │ │ data │ │ │ ├────────┤ │ │ │map_node│◀─┘ │ └────────┘ │ │ │ ┌───────┐ sk └──────────│ list │ ┌──────┐ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ └───────┘ │*sk_bpf_storage───────▶bpf_sk_storage └──────┘ Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2019-04-27 07:39:39 +08:00
#include <net/bpf_sk_storage.h>
#include <net/sock.h>
#include <net/tcp.h>
#include <linux/error-injection.h>
#include <linux/smp.h>
bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
#define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
#include <trace/events/bpf_test_run.h>
static int bpf_test_run(struct bpf_prog *prog, void *ctx, u32 repeat,
u32 *retval, u32 *time, bool xdp)
bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
{
struct bpf_cgroup_storage *storage[MAX_BPF_CGROUP_STORAGE_TYPE] = { NULL };
enum bpf_cgroup_storage_type stype;
bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
u64 time_start, time_spent = 0;
int ret = 0;
u32 i;
bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
for_each_cgroup_storage_type(stype) {
storage[stype] = bpf_cgroup_storage_alloc(prog, stype);
if (IS_ERR(storage[stype])) {
storage[stype] = NULL;
for_each_cgroup_storage_type(stype)
bpf_cgroup_storage_free(storage[stype]);
return -ENOMEM;
}
}
bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
if (!repeat)
repeat = 1;
rcu_read_lock();
migrate_disable();
bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
time_start = ktime_get_ns();
for (i = 0; i < repeat; i++) {
bpf_cgroup_storage_set(storage);
if (xdp)
*retval = bpf_prog_run_xdp(prog, ctx);
else
*retval = BPF_PROG_RUN(prog, ctx);
if (signal_pending(current)) {
ret = -EINTR;
break;
}
bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
if (need_resched()) {
time_spent += ktime_get_ns() - time_start;
migrate_enable();
rcu_read_unlock();
bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
cond_resched();
rcu_read_lock();
migrate_disable();
bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
time_start = ktime_get_ns();
}
}
time_spent += ktime_get_ns() - time_start;
migrate_enable();
rcu_read_unlock();
bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
do_div(time_spent, repeat);
*time = time_spent > U32_MAX ? U32_MAX : (u32)time_spent;
for_each_cgroup_storage_type(stype)
bpf_cgroup_storage_free(storage[stype]);
return ret;
bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
}
static int bpf_test_finish(const union bpf_attr *kattr,
union bpf_attr __user *uattr, const void *data,
bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
u32 size, u32 retval, u32 duration)
{
void __user *data_out = u64_to_user_ptr(kattr->test.data_out);
bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
int err = -EFAULT;
u32 copy_size = size;
bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
/* Clamp copy if the user has provided a size hint, but copy the full
* buffer if not to retain old behaviour.
*/
if (kattr->test.data_size_out &&
copy_size > kattr->test.data_size_out) {
copy_size = kattr->test.data_size_out;
err = -ENOSPC;
}
if (data_out && copy_to_user(data_out, data, copy_size))
bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
goto out;
if (copy_to_user(&uattr->test.data_size_out, &size, sizeof(size)))
goto out;
if (copy_to_user(&uattr->test.retval, &retval, sizeof(retval)))
goto out;
if (copy_to_user(&uattr->test.duration, &duration, sizeof(duration)))
goto out;
if (err != -ENOSPC)
err = 0;
bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
out:
trace_bpf_test_finish(&err);
bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
return err;
}
/* Integer types of various sizes and pointer combinations cover variety of
* architecture dependent calling conventions. 7+ can be supported in the
* future.
*/
__diag_push();
__diag_ignore(GCC, 8, "-Wmissing-prototypes",
"Global functions as their definitions will be in vmlinux BTF");
int noinline bpf_fentry_test1(int a)
{
return a + 1;
}
int noinline bpf_fentry_test2(int a, u64 b)
{
return a + b;
}
int noinline bpf_fentry_test3(char a, int b, u64 c)
{
return a + b + c;
}
int noinline bpf_fentry_test4(void *a, char b, int c, u64 d)
{
return (long)a + b + c + d;
}
int noinline bpf_fentry_test5(u64 a, void *b, short c, int d, u64 e)
{
return a + (long)b + c + d + e;
}
int noinline bpf_fentry_test6(u64 a, void *b, short c, int d, void *e, u64 f)
{
return a + (long)b + c + d + (long)e + f;
}
struct bpf_fentry_test_t {
struct bpf_fentry_test_t *a;
};
int noinline bpf_fentry_test7(struct bpf_fentry_test_t *arg)
{
return (long)arg;
}
int noinline bpf_fentry_test8(struct bpf_fentry_test_t *arg)
{
return (long)arg->a;
}
int noinline bpf_modify_return_test(int a, int *b)
{
*b += 1;
return a + *b;
}
__diag_pop();
ALLOW_ERROR_INJECTION(bpf_modify_return_test, ERRNO);
bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
static void *bpf_test_init(const union bpf_attr *kattr, u32 size,
u32 headroom, u32 tailroom)
{
void __user *data_in = u64_to_user_ptr(kattr->test.data_in);
u32 user_size = kattr->test.data_size_in;
bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
void *data;
if (size < ETH_HLEN || size > PAGE_SIZE - headroom - tailroom)
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
if (user_size > size)
return ERR_PTR(-EMSGSIZE);
bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
data = kzalloc(size + headroom + tailroom, GFP_USER);
if (!data)
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
if (copy_from_user(data + headroom, data_in, user_size)) {
bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
kfree(data);
return ERR_PTR(-EFAULT);
}
bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
return data;
}
int bpf_prog_test_run_tracing(struct bpf_prog *prog,
const union bpf_attr *kattr,
union bpf_attr __user *uattr)
{
struct bpf_fentry_test_t arg = {};
u16 side_effect = 0, ret = 0;
int b = 2, err = -EFAULT;
u32 retval = 0;
if (kattr->test.flags || kattr->test.cpu)
return -EINVAL;
switch (prog->expected_attach_type) {
case BPF_TRACE_FENTRY:
case BPF_TRACE_FEXIT:
if (bpf_fentry_test1(1) != 2 ||
bpf_fentry_test2(2, 3) != 5 ||
bpf_fentry_test3(4, 5, 6) != 15 ||
bpf_fentry_test4((void *)7, 8, 9, 10) != 34 ||
bpf_fentry_test5(11, (void *)12, 13, 14, 15) != 65 ||
bpf_fentry_test6(16, (void *)17, 18, 19, (void *)20, 21) != 111 ||
bpf_fentry_test7((struct bpf_fentry_test_t *)0) != 0 ||
bpf_fentry_test8(&arg) != 0)
goto out;
break;
case BPF_MODIFY_RETURN:
ret = bpf_modify_return_test(1, &b);
if (b != 2)
side_effect = 1;
break;
default:
goto out;
}
retval = ((u32)side_effect << 16) | ret;
if (copy_to_user(&uattr->test.retval, &retval, sizeof(retval)))
goto out;
err = 0;
out:
trace_bpf_test_finish(&err);
return err;
}
struct bpf_raw_tp_test_run_info {
struct bpf_prog *prog;
void *ctx;
u32 retval;
};
static void
__bpf_prog_test_run_raw_tp(void *data)
{
struct bpf_raw_tp_test_run_info *info = data;
rcu_read_lock();
info->retval = BPF_PROG_RUN(info->prog, info->ctx);
rcu_read_unlock();
}
int bpf_prog_test_run_raw_tp(struct bpf_prog *prog,
const union bpf_attr *kattr,
union bpf_attr __user *uattr)
{
void __user *ctx_in = u64_to_user_ptr(kattr->test.ctx_in);
__u32 ctx_size_in = kattr->test.ctx_size_in;
struct bpf_raw_tp_test_run_info info;
int cpu = kattr->test.cpu, err = 0;
int current_cpu;
/* doesn't support data_in/out, ctx_out, duration, or repeat */
if (kattr->test.data_in || kattr->test.data_out ||
kattr->test.ctx_out || kattr->test.duration ||
kattr->test.repeat)
return -EINVAL;
bpf: Reject too big ctx_size_in for raw_tp test run syzbot reported a WARNING for allocating too big memory: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 8484 at mm/page_alloc.c:4976 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x5f8/0x730 mm/page_alloc.c:5011 Modules linked in: CPU: 1 PID: 8484 Comm: syz-executor862 Not tainted 5.11.0-rc2-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011 RIP: 0010:__alloc_pages_nodemask+0x5f8/0x730 mm/page_alloc.c:4976 Code: 00 00 0c 00 0f 85 a7 00 00 00 8b 3c 24 4c 89 f2 44 89 e6 c6 44 24 70 00 48 89 6c 24 58 e8 d0 d7 ff ff 49 89 c5 e9 ea fc ff ff <0f> 0b e9 b5 fd ff ff 89 74 24 14 4c 89 4c 24 08 4c 89 74 24 18 e8 RSP: 0018:ffffc900012efb10 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 1ffff9200025df66 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: dffffc0000000000 RDI: 0000000000140dc0 RBP: 0000000000140dc0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: ffffffff81b1f7e1 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000014 R13: 0000000000000014 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 FS: 000000000190c880(0000) GS:ffff8880b9e00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f08b7f316c0 CR3: 0000000012073000 CR4: 00000000001506f0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: alloc_pages_current+0x18c/0x2a0 mm/mempolicy.c:2267 alloc_pages include/linux/gfp.h:547 [inline] kmalloc_order+0x2e/0xb0 mm/slab_common.c:837 kmalloc_order_trace+0x14/0x120 mm/slab_common.c:853 kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:557 [inline] kzalloc include/linux/slab.h:682 [inline] bpf_prog_test_run_raw_tp+0x4b5/0x670 net/bpf/test_run.c:282 bpf_prog_test_run kernel/bpf/syscall.c:3120 [inline] __do_sys_bpf+0x1ea9/0x4f10 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4398 do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 RIP: 0033:0x440499 Code: 18 89 d0 c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 0f 83 7b 13 fc ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 RSP: 002b:00007ffe1f3bfb18 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000141 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000004002c8 RCX: 0000000000440499 RDX: 0000000000000048 RSI: 0000000020000600 RDI: 000000000000000a RBP: 00000000006ca018 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00000000004002c8 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000401ca0 R13: 0000000000401d30 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 This is because we didn't filter out too big ctx_size_in. Fix it by rejecting ctx_size_in that are bigger than MAX_BPF_FUNC_ARGS (12) u64 numbers. Fixes: 1b4d60ec162f ("bpf: Enable BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN for raw_tracepoint") Reported-by: syzbot+4f98876664c7337a4ae6@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210112234254.1906829-1-songliubraving@fb.com
2021-01-13 07:42:54 +08:00
if (ctx_size_in < prog->aux->max_ctx_offset ||
ctx_size_in > MAX_BPF_FUNC_ARGS * sizeof(u64))
return -EINVAL;
if ((kattr->test.flags & BPF_F_TEST_RUN_ON_CPU) == 0 && cpu != 0)
return -EINVAL;
if (ctx_size_in) {
info.ctx = kzalloc(ctx_size_in, GFP_USER);
if (!info.ctx)
return -ENOMEM;
if (copy_from_user(info.ctx, ctx_in, ctx_size_in)) {
err = -EFAULT;
goto out;
}
} else {
info.ctx = NULL;
}
info.prog = prog;
current_cpu = get_cpu();
if ((kattr->test.flags & BPF_F_TEST_RUN_ON_CPU) == 0 ||
cpu == current_cpu) {
__bpf_prog_test_run_raw_tp(&info);
} else if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids || !cpu_online(cpu)) {
/* smp_call_function_single() also checks cpu_online()
* after csd_lock(). However, since cpu is from user
* space, let's do an extra quick check to filter out
* invalid value before smp_call_function_single().
*/
err = -ENXIO;
} else {
err = smp_call_function_single(cpu, __bpf_prog_test_run_raw_tp,
&info, 1);
}
put_cpu();
if (!err &&
copy_to_user(&uattr->test.retval, &info.retval, sizeof(u32)))
err = -EFAULT;
out:
kfree(info.ctx);
return err;
}
bpf: support input __sk_buff context in BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN Add new set of arguments to bpf_attr for BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN: * ctx_in/ctx_size_in - input context * ctx_out/ctx_size_out - output context The intended use case is to pass some meta data to the test runs that operate on skb (this has being brought up on recent LPC). For programs that use bpf_prog_test_run_skb, support __sk_buff input and output. Initially, from input __sk_buff, copy _only_ cb and priority into skb, all other non-zero fields are prohibited (with EINVAL). If the user has set ctx_out/ctx_size_out, copy the potentially modified __sk_buff back to the userspace. We require all fields of input __sk_buff except the ones we explicitly support to be set to zero. The expectation is that in the future we might add support for more fields and we want to fail explicitly if the user runs the program on the kernel where we don't yet support them. The API is intentionally vague (i.e. we don't explicitly add __sk_buff to bpf_attr, but ctx_in) to potentially let other test_run types use this interface in the future (this can be xdp_md for xdp types for example). v4: * don't copy more than allowed in bpf_ctx_init [Martin] v3: * handle case where ctx_in is NULL, but ctx_out is not [Martin] * convert size==0 checks to ptr==NULL checks and add some extra ptr checks [Martin] v2: * Addressed comments from Martin Lau Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-04-10 02:49:09 +08:00
static void *bpf_ctx_init(const union bpf_attr *kattr, u32 max_size)
{
void __user *data_in = u64_to_user_ptr(kattr->test.ctx_in);
void __user *data_out = u64_to_user_ptr(kattr->test.ctx_out);
u32 size = kattr->test.ctx_size_in;
void *data;
int err;
if (!data_in && !data_out)
return NULL;
data = kzalloc(max_size, GFP_USER);
if (!data)
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
if (data_in) {
err = bpf_check_uarg_tail_zero(data_in, max_size, size);
if (err) {
kfree(data);
return ERR_PTR(err);
}
size = min_t(u32, max_size, size);
if (copy_from_user(data, data_in, size)) {
kfree(data);
return ERR_PTR(-EFAULT);
}
}
return data;
}
static int bpf_ctx_finish(const union bpf_attr *kattr,
union bpf_attr __user *uattr, const void *data,
u32 size)
{
void __user *data_out = u64_to_user_ptr(kattr->test.ctx_out);
int err = -EFAULT;
u32 copy_size = size;
if (!data || !data_out)
return 0;
if (copy_size > kattr->test.ctx_size_out) {
copy_size = kattr->test.ctx_size_out;
err = -ENOSPC;
}
if (copy_to_user(data_out, data, copy_size))
goto out;
if (copy_to_user(&uattr->test.ctx_size_out, &size, sizeof(size)))
goto out;
if (err != -ENOSPC)
err = 0;
out:
return err;
}
/**
* range_is_zero - test whether buffer is initialized
* @buf: buffer to check
* @from: check from this position
* @to: check up until (excluding) this position
*
* This function returns true if the there is a non-zero byte
* in the buf in the range [from,to).
*/
static inline bool range_is_zero(void *buf, size_t from, size_t to)
{
return !memchr_inv((u8 *)buf + from, 0, to - from);
}
static int convert___skb_to_skb(struct sk_buff *skb, struct __sk_buff *__skb)
{
struct qdisc_skb_cb *cb = (struct qdisc_skb_cb *)skb->cb;
if (!__skb)
return 0;
/* make sure the fields we don't use are zeroed */
if (!range_is_zero(__skb, 0, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, mark)))
return -EINVAL;
/* mark is allowed */
if (!range_is_zero(__skb, offsetofend(struct __sk_buff, mark),
offsetof(struct __sk_buff, priority)))
bpf: support input __sk_buff context in BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN Add new set of arguments to bpf_attr for BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN: * ctx_in/ctx_size_in - input context * ctx_out/ctx_size_out - output context The intended use case is to pass some meta data to the test runs that operate on skb (this has being brought up on recent LPC). For programs that use bpf_prog_test_run_skb, support __sk_buff input and output. Initially, from input __sk_buff, copy _only_ cb and priority into skb, all other non-zero fields are prohibited (with EINVAL). If the user has set ctx_out/ctx_size_out, copy the potentially modified __sk_buff back to the userspace. We require all fields of input __sk_buff except the ones we explicitly support to be set to zero. The expectation is that in the future we might add support for more fields and we want to fail explicitly if the user runs the program on the kernel where we don't yet support them. The API is intentionally vague (i.e. we don't explicitly add __sk_buff to bpf_attr, but ctx_in) to potentially let other test_run types use this interface in the future (this can be xdp_md for xdp types for example). v4: * don't copy more than allowed in bpf_ctx_init [Martin] v3: * handle case where ctx_in is NULL, but ctx_out is not [Martin] * convert size==0 checks to ptr==NULL checks and add some extra ptr checks [Martin] v2: * Addressed comments from Martin Lau Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-04-10 02:49:09 +08:00
return -EINVAL;
/* priority is allowed */
if (!range_is_zero(__skb, offsetofend(struct __sk_buff, priority),
offsetof(struct __sk_buff, ifindex)))
return -EINVAL;
/* ifindex is allowed */
if (!range_is_zero(__skb, offsetofend(struct __sk_buff, ifindex),
bpf: support input __sk_buff context in BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN Add new set of arguments to bpf_attr for BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN: * ctx_in/ctx_size_in - input context * ctx_out/ctx_size_out - output context The intended use case is to pass some meta data to the test runs that operate on skb (this has being brought up on recent LPC). For programs that use bpf_prog_test_run_skb, support __sk_buff input and output. Initially, from input __sk_buff, copy _only_ cb and priority into skb, all other non-zero fields are prohibited (with EINVAL). If the user has set ctx_out/ctx_size_out, copy the potentially modified __sk_buff back to the userspace. We require all fields of input __sk_buff except the ones we explicitly support to be set to zero. The expectation is that in the future we might add support for more fields and we want to fail explicitly if the user runs the program on the kernel where we don't yet support them. The API is intentionally vague (i.e. we don't explicitly add __sk_buff to bpf_attr, but ctx_in) to potentially let other test_run types use this interface in the future (this can be xdp_md for xdp types for example). v4: * don't copy more than allowed in bpf_ctx_init [Martin] v3: * handle case where ctx_in is NULL, but ctx_out is not [Martin] * convert size==0 checks to ptr==NULL checks and add some extra ptr checks [Martin] v2: * Addressed comments from Martin Lau Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-04-10 02:49:09 +08:00
offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb)))
return -EINVAL;
/* cb is allowed */
if (!range_is_zero(__skb, offsetofend(struct __sk_buff, cb),
offsetof(struct __sk_buff, tstamp)))
return -EINVAL;
/* tstamp is allowed */
/* wire_len is allowed */
/* gso_segs is allowed */
if (!range_is_zero(__skb, offsetofend(struct __sk_buff, gso_segs),
offsetof(struct __sk_buff, gso_size)))
return -EINVAL;
/* gso_size is allowed */
if (!range_is_zero(__skb, offsetofend(struct __sk_buff, gso_size),
bpf: support input __sk_buff context in BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN Add new set of arguments to bpf_attr for BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN: * ctx_in/ctx_size_in - input context * ctx_out/ctx_size_out - output context The intended use case is to pass some meta data to the test runs that operate on skb (this has being brought up on recent LPC). For programs that use bpf_prog_test_run_skb, support __sk_buff input and output. Initially, from input __sk_buff, copy _only_ cb and priority into skb, all other non-zero fields are prohibited (with EINVAL). If the user has set ctx_out/ctx_size_out, copy the potentially modified __sk_buff back to the userspace. We require all fields of input __sk_buff except the ones we explicitly support to be set to zero. The expectation is that in the future we might add support for more fields and we want to fail explicitly if the user runs the program on the kernel where we don't yet support them. The API is intentionally vague (i.e. we don't explicitly add __sk_buff to bpf_attr, but ctx_in) to potentially let other test_run types use this interface in the future (this can be xdp_md for xdp types for example). v4: * don't copy more than allowed in bpf_ctx_init [Martin] v3: * handle case where ctx_in is NULL, but ctx_out is not [Martin] * convert size==0 checks to ptr==NULL checks and add some extra ptr checks [Martin] v2: * Addressed comments from Martin Lau Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-04-10 02:49:09 +08:00
sizeof(struct __sk_buff)))
return -EINVAL;
skb->mark = __skb->mark;
bpf: support input __sk_buff context in BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN Add new set of arguments to bpf_attr for BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN: * ctx_in/ctx_size_in - input context * ctx_out/ctx_size_out - output context The intended use case is to pass some meta data to the test runs that operate on skb (this has being brought up on recent LPC). For programs that use bpf_prog_test_run_skb, support __sk_buff input and output. Initially, from input __sk_buff, copy _only_ cb and priority into skb, all other non-zero fields are prohibited (with EINVAL). If the user has set ctx_out/ctx_size_out, copy the potentially modified __sk_buff back to the userspace. We require all fields of input __sk_buff except the ones we explicitly support to be set to zero. The expectation is that in the future we might add support for more fields and we want to fail explicitly if the user runs the program on the kernel where we don't yet support them. The API is intentionally vague (i.e. we don't explicitly add __sk_buff to bpf_attr, but ctx_in) to potentially let other test_run types use this interface in the future (this can be xdp_md for xdp types for example). v4: * don't copy more than allowed in bpf_ctx_init [Martin] v3: * handle case where ctx_in is NULL, but ctx_out is not [Martin] * convert size==0 checks to ptr==NULL checks and add some extra ptr checks [Martin] v2: * Addressed comments from Martin Lau Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-04-10 02:49:09 +08:00
skb->priority = __skb->priority;
skb->tstamp = __skb->tstamp;
bpf: support input __sk_buff context in BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN Add new set of arguments to bpf_attr for BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN: * ctx_in/ctx_size_in - input context * ctx_out/ctx_size_out - output context The intended use case is to pass some meta data to the test runs that operate on skb (this has being brought up on recent LPC). For programs that use bpf_prog_test_run_skb, support __sk_buff input and output. Initially, from input __sk_buff, copy _only_ cb and priority into skb, all other non-zero fields are prohibited (with EINVAL). If the user has set ctx_out/ctx_size_out, copy the potentially modified __sk_buff back to the userspace. We require all fields of input __sk_buff except the ones we explicitly support to be set to zero. The expectation is that in the future we might add support for more fields and we want to fail explicitly if the user runs the program on the kernel where we don't yet support them. The API is intentionally vague (i.e. we don't explicitly add __sk_buff to bpf_attr, but ctx_in) to potentially let other test_run types use this interface in the future (this can be xdp_md for xdp types for example). v4: * don't copy more than allowed in bpf_ctx_init [Martin] v3: * handle case where ctx_in is NULL, but ctx_out is not [Martin] * convert size==0 checks to ptr==NULL checks and add some extra ptr checks [Martin] v2: * Addressed comments from Martin Lau Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-04-10 02:49:09 +08:00
memcpy(&cb->data, __skb->cb, QDISC_CB_PRIV_LEN);
if (__skb->wire_len == 0) {
cb->pkt_len = skb->len;
} else {
if (__skb->wire_len < skb->len ||
__skb->wire_len > GSO_MAX_SIZE)
return -EINVAL;
cb->pkt_len = __skb->wire_len;
}
if (__skb->gso_segs > GSO_MAX_SEGS)
return -EINVAL;
skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_segs = __skb->gso_segs;
skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_size = __skb->gso_size;
bpf: support input __sk_buff context in BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN Add new set of arguments to bpf_attr for BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN: * ctx_in/ctx_size_in - input context * ctx_out/ctx_size_out - output context The intended use case is to pass some meta data to the test runs that operate on skb (this has being brought up on recent LPC). For programs that use bpf_prog_test_run_skb, support __sk_buff input and output. Initially, from input __sk_buff, copy _only_ cb and priority into skb, all other non-zero fields are prohibited (with EINVAL). If the user has set ctx_out/ctx_size_out, copy the potentially modified __sk_buff back to the userspace. We require all fields of input __sk_buff except the ones we explicitly support to be set to zero. The expectation is that in the future we might add support for more fields and we want to fail explicitly if the user runs the program on the kernel where we don't yet support them. The API is intentionally vague (i.e. we don't explicitly add __sk_buff to bpf_attr, but ctx_in) to potentially let other test_run types use this interface in the future (this can be xdp_md for xdp types for example). v4: * don't copy more than allowed in bpf_ctx_init [Martin] v3: * handle case where ctx_in is NULL, but ctx_out is not [Martin] * convert size==0 checks to ptr==NULL checks and add some extra ptr checks [Martin] v2: * Addressed comments from Martin Lau Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-04-10 02:49:09 +08:00
return 0;
}
static void convert_skb_to___skb(struct sk_buff *skb, struct __sk_buff *__skb)
{
struct qdisc_skb_cb *cb = (struct qdisc_skb_cb *)skb->cb;
if (!__skb)
return;
__skb->mark = skb->mark;
bpf: support input __sk_buff context in BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN Add new set of arguments to bpf_attr for BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN: * ctx_in/ctx_size_in - input context * ctx_out/ctx_size_out - output context The intended use case is to pass some meta data to the test runs that operate on skb (this has being brought up on recent LPC). For programs that use bpf_prog_test_run_skb, support __sk_buff input and output. Initially, from input __sk_buff, copy _only_ cb and priority into skb, all other non-zero fields are prohibited (with EINVAL). If the user has set ctx_out/ctx_size_out, copy the potentially modified __sk_buff back to the userspace. We require all fields of input __sk_buff except the ones we explicitly support to be set to zero. The expectation is that in the future we might add support for more fields and we want to fail explicitly if the user runs the program on the kernel where we don't yet support them. The API is intentionally vague (i.e. we don't explicitly add __sk_buff to bpf_attr, but ctx_in) to potentially let other test_run types use this interface in the future (this can be xdp_md for xdp types for example). v4: * don't copy more than allowed in bpf_ctx_init [Martin] v3: * handle case where ctx_in is NULL, but ctx_out is not [Martin] * convert size==0 checks to ptr==NULL checks and add some extra ptr checks [Martin] v2: * Addressed comments from Martin Lau Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-04-10 02:49:09 +08:00
__skb->priority = skb->priority;
__skb->ifindex = skb->dev->ifindex;
__skb->tstamp = skb->tstamp;
bpf: support input __sk_buff context in BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN Add new set of arguments to bpf_attr for BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN: * ctx_in/ctx_size_in - input context * ctx_out/ctx_size_out - output context The intended use case is to pass some meta data to the test runs that operate on skb (this has being brought up on recent LPC). For programs that use bpf_prog_test_run_skb, support __sk_buff input and output. Initially, from input __sk_buff, copy _only_ cb and priority into skb, all other non-zero fields are prohibited (with EINVAL). If the user has set ctx_out/ctx_size_out, copy the potentially modified __sk_buff back to the userspace. We require all fields of input __sk_buff except the ones we explicitly support to be set to zero. The expectation is that in the future we might add support for more fields and we want to fail explicitly if the user runs the program on the kernel where we don't yet support them. The API is intentionally vague (i.e. we don't explicitly add __sk_buff to bpf_attr, but ctx_in) to potentially let other test_run types use this interface in the future (this can be xdp_md for xdp types for example). v4: * don't copy more than allowed in bpf_ctx_init [Martin] v3: * handle case where ctx_in is NULL, but ctx_out is not [Martin] * convert size==0 checks to ptr==NULL checks and add some extra ptr checks [Martin] v2: * Addressed comments from Martin Lau Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-04-10 02:49:09 +08:00
memcpy(__skb->cb, &cb->data, QDISC_CB_PRIV_LEN);
__skb->wire_len = cb->pkt_len;
__skb->gso_segs = skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_segs;
bpf: support input __sk_buff context in BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN Add new set of arguments to bpf_attr for BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN: * ctx_in/ctx_size_in - input context * ctx_out/ctx_size_out - output context The intended use case is to pass some meta data to the test runs that operate on skb (this has being brought up on recent LPC). For programs that use bpf_prog_test_run_skb, support __sk_buff input and output. Initially, from input __sk_buff, copy _only_ cb and priority into skb, all other non-zero fields are prohibited (with EINVAL). If the user has set ctx_out/ctx_size_out, copy the potentially modified __sk_buff back to the userspace. We require all fields of input __sk_buff except the ones we explicitly support to be set to zero. The expectation is that in the future we might add support for more fields and we want to fail explicitly if the user runs the program on the kernel where we don't yet support them. The API is intentionally vague (i.e. we don't explicitly add __sk_buff to bpf_attr, but ctx_in) to potentially let other test_run types use this interface in the future (this can be xdp_md for xdp types for example). v4: * don't copy more than allowed in bpf_ctx_init [Martin] v3: * handle case where ctx_in is NULL, but ctx_out is not [Martin] * convert size==0 checks to ptr==NULL checks and add some extra ptr checks [Martin] v2: * Addressed comments from Martin Lau Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-04-10 02:49:09 +08:00
}
bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
int bpf_prog_test_run_skb(struct bpf_prog *prog, const union bpf_attr *kattr,
union bpf_attr __user *uattr)
{
bool is_l2 = false, is_direct_pkt_access = false;
struct net *net = current->nsproxy->net_ns;
struct net_device *dev = net->loopback_dev;
bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
u32 size = kattr->test.data_size_in;
u32 repeat = kattr->test.repeat;
bpf: support input __sk_buff context in BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN Add new set of arguments to bpf_attr for BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN: * ctx_in/ctx_size_in - input context * ctx_out/ctx_size_out - output context The intended use case is to pass some meta data to the test runs that operate on skb (this has being brought up on recent LPC). For programs that use bpf_prog_test_run_skb, support __sk_buff input and output. Initially, from input __sk_buff, copy _only_ cb and priority into skb, all other non-zero fields are prohibited (with EINVAL). If the user has set ctx_out/ctx_size_out, copy the potentially modified __sk_buff back to the userspace. We require all fields of input __sk_buff except the ones we explicitly support to be set to zero. The expectation is that in the future we might add support for more fields and we want to fail explicitly if the user runs the program on the kernel where we don't yet support them. The API is intentionally vague (i.e. we don't explicitly add __sk_buff to bpf_attr, but ctx_in) to potentially let other test_run types use this interface in the future (this can be xdp_md for xdp types for example). v4: * don't copy more than allowed in bpf_ctx_init [Martin] v3: * handle case where ctx_in is NULL, but ctx_out is not [Martin] * convert size==0 checks to ptr==NULL checks and add some extra ptr checks [Martin] v2: * Addressed comments from Martin Lau Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-04-10 02:49:09 +08:00
struct __sk_buff *ctx = NULL;
bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
u32 retval, duration;
bpf: fix panic due to oob in bpf_prog_test_run_skb sykzaller triggered several panics similar to the below: [...] [ 248.851531] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in _copy_to_user+0x5c/0x90 [ 248.857656] Read of size 985 at addr ffff8808017ffff2 by task a.out/1425 [...] [ 248.865902] CPU: 1 PID: 1425 Comm: a.out Not tainted 4.18.0-rc4+ #13 [ 248.865903] Hardware name: Supermicro SYS-5039MS-H12TRF/X11SSE-F, BIOS 2.1a 03/08/2018 [ 248.865905] Call Trace: [ 248.865910] dump_stack+0xd6/0x185 [ 248.865911] ? show_regs_print_info+0xb/0xb [ 248.865913] ? printk+0x9c/0xc3 [ 248.865915] ? kmsg_dump_rewind_nolock+0xe4/0xe4 [ 248.865919] print_address_description+0x6f/0x270 [ 248.865920] kasan_report+0x25b/0x380 [ 248.865922] ? _copy_to_user+0x5c/0x90 [ 248.865924] check_memory_region+0x137/0x190 [ 248.865925] kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20 [ 248.865927] _copy_to_user+0x5c/0x90 [ 248.865930] bpf_test_finish.isra.8+0x4f/0xc0 [ 248.865932] bpf_prog_test_run_skb+0x6a0/0xba0 [...] After scrubbing the BPF prog a bit from the noise, turns out it called bpf_skb_change_head() for the lwt_xmit prog with headroom of 2. Nothing wrong in that, however, this was run with repeat >> 0 in bpf_prog_test_run_skb() and the same skb thus keeps changing until the pskb_expand_head() called from skb_cow() keeps bailing out in atomic alloc context with -ENOMEM. So upon return we'll basically have 0 headroom left yet blindly do the __skb_push() of 14 bytes and keep copying data from there in bpf_test_finish() out of bounds. Fix to check if we have enough headroom and if pskb_expand_head() fails, bail out with error. Another bug independent of this fix (but related in triggering above) is that BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN should be reworked to reset the skb/xdp buffer to it's original state from input as otherwise repeating the same test in a loop won't work for benchmarking when underlying input buffer is getting changed by the prog each time and reused for the next run leading to unexpected results. Fixes: 1cf1cae963c2 ("bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command") Reported-by: syzbot+709412e651e55ed96498@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Reported-by: syzbot+54f39d6ab58f39720a55@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-07-11 21:30:14 +08:00
int hh_len = ETH_HLEN;
bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
struct sk_buff *skb;
struct sock *sk;
bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
void *data;
int ret;
if (kattr->test.flags || kattr->test.cpu)
return -EINVAL;
data = bpf_test_init(kattr, size, NET_SKB_PAD + NET_IP_ALIGN,
bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
SKB_DATA_ALIGN(sizeof(struct skb_shared_info)));
if (IS_ERR(data))
return PTR_ERR(data);
bpf: support input __sk_buff context in BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN Add new set of arguments to bpf_attr for BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN: * ctx_in/ctx_size_in - input context * ctx_out/ctx_size_out - output context The intended use case is to pass some meta data to the test runs that operate on skb (this has being brought up on recent LPC). For programs that use bpf_prog_test_run_skb, support __sk_buff input and output. Initially, from input __sk_buff, copy _only_ cb and priority into skb, all other non-zero fields are prohibited (with EINVAL). If the user has set ctx_out/ctx_size_out, copy the potentially modified __sk_buff back to the userspace. We require all fields of input __sk_buff except the ones we explicitly support to be set to zero. The expectation is that in the future we might add support for more fields and we want to fail explicitly if the user runs the program on the kernel where we don't yet support them. The API is intentionally vague (i.e. we don't explicitly add __sk_buff to bpf_attr, but ctx_in) to potentially let other test_run types use this interface in the future (this can be xdp_md for xdp types for example). v4: * don't copy more than allowed in bpf_ctx_init [Martin] v3: * handle case where ctx_in is NULL, but ctx_out is not [Martin] * convert size==0 checks to ptr==NULL checks and add some extra ptr checks [Martin] v2: * Addressed comments from Martin Lau Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-04-10 02:49:09 +08:00
ctx = bpf_ctx_init(kattr, sizeof(struct __sk_buff));
if (IS_ERR(ctx)) {
kfree(data);
return PTR_ERR(ctx);
}
bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
switch (prog->type) {
case BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS:
case BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_ACT:
is_l2 = true;
fallthrough;
bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
case BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_IN:
case BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_OUT:
case BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_XMIT:
is_direct_pkt_access = true;
break;
default:
break;
}
sk = kzalloc(sizeof(struct sock), GFP_USER);
if (!sk) {
kfree(data);
bpf: support input __sk_buff context in BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN Add new set of arguments to bpf_attr for BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN: * ctx_in/ctx_size_in - input context * ctx_out/ctx_size_out - output context The intended use case is to pass some meta data to the test runs that operate on skb (this has being brought up on recent LPC). For programs that use bpf_prog_test_run_skb, support __sk_buff input and output. Initially, from input __sk_buff, copy _only_ cb and priority into skb, all other non-zero fields are prohibited (with EINVAL). If the user has set ctx_out/ctx_size_out, copy the potentially modified __sk_buff back to the userspace. We require all fields of input __sk_buff except the ones we explicitly support to be set to zero. The expectation is that in the future we might add support for more fields and we want to fail explicitly if the user runs the program on the kernel where we don't yet support them. The API is intentionally vague (i.e. we don't explicitly add __sk_buff to bpf_attr, but ctx_in) to potentially let other test_run types use this interface in the future (this can be xdp_md for xdp types for example). v4: * don't copy more than allowed in bpf_ctx_init [Martin] v3: * handle case where ctx_in is NULL, but ctx_out is not [Martin] * convert size==0 checks to ptr==NULL checks and add some extra ptr checks [Martin] v2: * Addressed comments from Martin Lau Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-04-10 02:49:09 +08:00
kfree(ctx);
return -ENOMEM;
}
sock_net_set(sk, net);
sock_init_data(NULL, sk);
bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
skb = build_skb(data, 0);
if (!skb) {
kfree(data);
bpf: support input __sk_buff context in BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN Add new set of arguments to bpf_attr for BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN: * ctx_in/ctx_size_in - input context * ctx_out/ctx_size_out - output context The intended use case is to pass some meta data to the test runs that operate on skb (this has being brought up on recent LPC). For programs that use bpf_prog_test_run_skb, support __sk_buff input and output. Initially, from input __sk_buff, copy _only_ cb and priority into skb, all other non-zero fields are prohibited (with EINVAL). If the user has set ctx_out/ctx_size_out, copy the potentially modified __sk_buff back to the userspace. We require all fields of input __sk_buff except the ones we explicitly support to be set to zero. The expectation is that in the future we might add support for more fields and we want to fail explicitly if the user runs the program on the kernel where we don't yet support them. The API is intentionally vague (i.e. we don't explicitly add __sk_buff to bpf_attr, but ctx_in) to potentially let other test_run types use this interface in the future (this can be xdp_md for xdp types for example). v4: * don't copy more than allowed in bpf_ctx_init [Martin] v3: * handle case where ctx_in is NULL, but ctx_out is not [Martin] * convert size==0 checks to ptr==NULL checks and add some extra ptr checks [Martin] v2: * Addressed comments from Martin Lau Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-04-10 02:49:09 +08:00
kfree(ctx);
kfree(sk);
bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
return -ENOMEM;
}
skb->sk = sk;
bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
skb_reserve(skb, NET_SKB_PAD + NET_IP_ALIGN);
bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
__skb_put(skb, size);
if (ctx && ctx->ifindex > 1) {
dev = dev_get_by_index(net, ctx->ifindex);
if (!dev) {
ret = -ENODEV;
goto out;
}
}
skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(skb, dev);
bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
skb_reset_network_header(skb);
switch (skb->protocol) {
case htons(ETH_P_IP):
sk->sk_family = AF_INET;
if (sizeof(struct iphdr) <= skb_headlen(skb)) {
sk->sk_rcv_saddr = ip_hdr(skb)->saddr;
sk->sk_daddr = ip_hdr(skb)->daddr;
}
break;
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
case htons(ETH_P_IPV6):
sk->sk_family = AF_INET6;
if (sizeof(struct ipv6hdr) <= skb_headlen(skb)) {
sk->sk_v6_rcv_saddr = ipv6_hdr(skb)->saddr;
sk->sk_v6_daddr = ipv6_hdr(skb)->daddr;
}
break;
#endif
default:
break;
}
bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
if (is_l2)
bpf: fix panic due to oob in bpf_prog_test_run_skb sykzaller triggered several panics similar to the below: [...] [ 248.851531] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in _copy_to_user+0x5c/0x90 [ 248.857656] Read of size 985 at addr ffff8808017ffff2 by task a.out/1425 [...] [ 248.865902] CPU: 1 PID: 1425 Comm: a.out Not tainted 4.18.0-rc4+ #13 [ 248.865903] Hardware name: Supermicro SYS-5039MS-H12TRF/X11SSE-F, BIOS 2.1a 03/08/2018 [ 248.865905] Call Trace: [ 248.865910] dump_stack+0xd6/0x185 [ 248.865911] ? show_regs_print_info+0xb/0xb [ 248.865913] ? printk+0x9c/0xc3 [ 248.865915] ? kmsg_dump_rewind_nolock+0xe4/0xe4 [ 248.865919] print_address_description+0x6f/0x270 [ 248.865920] kasan_report+0x25b/0x380 [ 248.865922] ? _copy_to_user+0x5c/0x90 [ 248.865924] check_memory_region+0x137/0x190 [ 248.865925] kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20 [ 248.865927] _copy_to_user+0x5c/0x90 [ 248.865930] bpf_test_finish.isra.8+0x4f/0xc0 [ 248.865932] bpf_prog_test_run_skb+0x6a0/0xba0 [...] After scrubbing the BPF prog a bit from the noise, turns out it called bpf_skb_change_head() for the lwt_xmit prog with headroom of 2. Nothing wrong in that, however, this was run with repeat >> 0 in bpf_prog_test_run_skb() and the same skb thus keeps changing until the pskb_expand_head() called from skb_cow() keeps bailing out in atomic alloc context with -ENOMEM. So upon return we'll basically have 0 headroom left yet blindly do the __skb_push() of 14 bytes and keep copying data from there in bpf_test_finish() out of bounds. Fix to check if we have enough headroom and if pskb_expand_head() fails, bail out with error. Another bug independent of this fix (but related in triggering above) is that BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN should be reworked to reset the skb/xdp buffer to it's original state from input as otherwise repeating the same test in a loop won't work for benchmarking when underlying input buffer is getting changed by the prog each time and reused for the next run leading to unexpected results. Fixes: 1cf1cae963c2 ("bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command") Reported-by: syzbot+709412e651e55ed96498@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Reported-by: syzbot+54f39d6ab58f39720a55@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-07-11 21:30:14 +08:00
__skb_push(skb, hh_len);
bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
if (is_direct_pkt_access)
bpf_compute_data_pointers(skb);
bpf: support input __sk_buff context in BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN Add new set of arguments to bpf_attr for BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN: * ctx_in/ctx_size_in - input context * ctx_out/ctx_size_out - output context The intended use case is to pass some meta data to the test runs that operate on skb (this has being brought up on recent LPC). For programs that use bpf_prog_test_run_skb, support __sk_buff input and output. Initially, from input __sk_buff, copy _only_ cb and priority into skb, all other non-zero fields are prohibited (with EINVAL). If the user has set ctx_out/ctx_size_out, copy the potentially modified __sk_buff back to the userspace. We require all fields of input __sk_buff except the ones we explicitly support to be set to zero. The expectation is that in the future we might add support for more fields and we want to fail explicitly if the user runs the program on the kernel where we don't yet support them. The API is intentionally vague (i.e. we don't explicitly add __sk_buff to bpf_attr, but ctx_in) to potentially let other test_run types use this interface in the future (this can be xdp_md for xdp types for example). v4: * don't copy more than allowed in bpf_ctx_init [Martin] v3: * handle case where ctx_in is NULL, but ctx_out is not [Martin] * convert size==0 checks to ptr==NULL checks and add some extra ptr checks [Martin] v2: * Addressed comments from Martin Lau Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-04-10 02:49:09 +08:00
ret = convert___skb_to_skb(skb, ctx);
if (ret)
goto out;
ret = bpf_test_run(prog, skb, repeat, &retval, &duration, false);
bpf: support input __sk_buff context in BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN Add new set of arguments to bpf_attr for BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN: * ctx_in/ctx_size_in - input context * ctx_out/ctx_size_out - output context The intended use case is to pass some meta data to the test runs that operate on skb (this has being brought up on recent LPC). For programs that use bpf_prog_test_run_skb, support __sk_buff input and output. Initially, from input __sk_buff, copy _only_ cb and priority into skb, all other non-zero fields are prohibited (with EINVAL). If the user has set ctx_out/ctx_size_out, copy the potentially modified __sk_buff back to the userspace. We require all fields of input __sk_buff except the ones we explicitly support to be set to zero. The expectation is that in the future we might add support for more fields and we want to fail explicitly if the user runs the program on the kernel where we don't yet support them. The API is intentionally vague (i.e. we don't explicitly add __sk_buff to bpf_attr, but ctx_in) to potentially let other test_run types use this interface in the future (this can be xdp_md for xdp types for example). v4: * don't copy more than allowed in bpf_ctx_init [Martin] v3: * handle case where ctx_in is NULL, but ctx_out is not [Martin] * convert size==0 checks to ptr==NULL checks and add some extra ptr checks [Martin] v2: * Addressed comments from Martin Lau Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-04-10 02:49:09 +08:00
if (ret)
goto out;
bpf: fix panic due to oob in bpf_prog_test_run_skb sykzaller triggered several panics similar to the below: [...] [ 248.851531] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in _copy_to_user+0x5c/0x90 [ 248.857656] Read of size 985 at addr ffff8808017ffff2 by task a.out/1425 [...] [ 248.865902] CPU: 1 PID: 1425 Comm: a.out Not tainted 4.18.0-rc4+ #13 [ 248.865903] Hardware name: Supermicro SYS-5039MS-H12TRF/X11SSE-F, BIOS 2.1a 03/08/2018 [ 248.865905] Call Trace: [ 248.865910] dump_stack+0xd6/0x185 [ 248.865911] ? show_regs_print_info+0xb/0xb [ 248.865913] ? printk+0x9c/0xc3 [ 248.865915] ? kmsg_dump_rewind_nolock+0xe4/0xe4 [ 248.865919] print_address_description+0x6f/0x270 [ 248.865920] kasan_report+0x25b/0x380 [ 248.865922] ? _copy_to_user+0x5c/0x90 [ 248.865924] check_memory_region+0x137/0x190 [ 248.865925] kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20 [ 248.865927] _copy_to_user+0x5c/0x90 [ 248.865930] bpf_test_finish.isra.8+0x4f/0xc0 [ 248.865932] bpf_prog_test_run_skb+0x6a0/0xba0 [...] After scrubbing the BPF prog a bit from the noise, turns out it called bpf_skb_change_head() for the lwt_xmit prog with headroom of 2. Nothing wrong in that, however, this was run with repeat >> 0 in bpf_prog_test_run_skb() and the same skb thus keeps changing until the pskb_expand_head() called from skb_cow() keeps bailing out in atomic alloc context with -ENOMEM. So upon return we'll basically have 0 headroom left yet blindly do the __skb_push() of 14 bytes and keep copying data from there in bpf_test_finish() out of bounds. Fix to check if we have enough headroom and if pskb_expand_head() fails, bail out with error. Another bug independent of this fix (but related in triggering above) is that BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN should be reworked to reset the skb/xdp buffer to it's original state from input as otherwise repeating the same test in a loop won't work for benchmarking when underlying input buffer is getting changed by the prog each time and reused for the next run leading to unexpected results. Fixes: 1cf1cae963c2 ("bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command") Reported-by: syzbot+709412e651e55ed96498@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Reported-by: syzbot+54f39d6ab58f39720a55@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-07-11 21:30:14 +08:00
if (!is_l2) {
if (skb_headroom(skb) < hh_len) {
int nhead = HH_DATA_ALIGN(hh_len - skb_headroom(skb));
if (pskb_expand_head(skb, nhead, 0, GFP_USER)) {
bpf: support input __sk_buff context in BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN Add new set of arguments to bpf_attr for BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN: * ctx_in/ctx_size_in - input context * ctx_out/ctx_size_out - output context The intended use case is to pass some meta data to the test runs that operate on skb (this has being brought up on recent LPC). For programs that use bpf_prog_test_run_skb, support __sk_buff input and output. Initially, from input __sk_buff, copy _only_ cb and priority into skb, all other non-zero fields are prohibited (with EINVAL). If the user has set ctx_out/ctx_size_out, copy the potentially modified __sk_buff back to the userspace. We require all fields of input __sk_buff except the ones we explicitly support to be set to zero. The expectation is that in the future we might add support for more fields and we want to fail explicitly if the user runs the program on the kernel where we don't yet support them. The API is intentionally vague (i.e. we don't explicitly add __sk_buff to bpf_attr, but ctx_in) to potentially let other test_run types use this interface in the future (this can be xdp_md for xdp types for example). v4: * don't copy more than allowed in bpf_ctx_init [Martin] v3: * handle case where ctx_in is NULL, but ctx_out is not [Martin] * convert size==0 checks to ptr==NULL checks and add some extra ptr checks [Martin] v2: * Addressed comments from Martin Lau Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-04-10 02:49:09 +08:00
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto out;
bpf: fix panic due to oob in bpf_prog_test_run_skb sykzaller triggered several panics similar to the below: [...] [ 248.851531] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in _copy_to_user+0x5c/0x90 [ 248.857656] Read of size 985 at addr ffff8808017ffff2 by task a.out/1425 [...] [ 248.865902] CPU: 1 PID: 1425 Comm: a.out Not tainted 4.18.0-rc4+ #13 [ 248.865903] Hardware name: Supermicro SYS-5039MS-H12TRF/X11SSE-F, BIOS 2.1a 03/08/2018 [ 248.865905] Call Trace: [ 248.865910] dump_stack+0xd6/0x185 [ 248.865911] ? show_regs_print_info+0xb/0xb [ 248.865913] ? printk+0x9c/0xc3 [ 248.865915] ? kmsg_dump_rewind_nolock+0xe4/0xe4 [ 248.865919] print_address_description+0x6f/0x270 [ 248.865920] kasan_report+0x25b/0x380 [ 248.865922] ? _copy_to_user+0x5c/0x90 [ 248.865924] check_memory_region+0x137/0x190 [ 248.865925] kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20 [ 248.865927] _copy_to_user+0x5c/0x90 [ 248.865930] bpf_test_finish.isra.8+0x4f/0xc0 [ 248.865932] bpf_prog_test_run_skb+0x6a0/0xba0 [...] After scrubbing the BPF prog a bit from the noise, turns out it called bpf_skb_change_head() for the lwt_xmit prog with headroom of 2. Nothing wrong in that, however, this was run with repeat >> 0 in bpf_prog_test_run_skb() and the same skb thus keeps changing until the pskb_expand_head() called from skb_cow() keeps bailing out in atomic alloc context with -ENOMEM. So upon return we'll basically have 0 headroom left yet blindly do the __skb_push() of 14 bytes and keep copying data from there in bpf_test_finish() out of bounds. Fix to check if we have enough headroom and if pskb_expand_head() fails, bail out with error. Another bug independent of this fix (but related in triggering above) is that BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN should be reworked to reset the skb/xdp buffer to it's original state from input as otherwise repeating the same test in a loop won't work for benchmarking when underlying input buffer is getting changed by the prog each time and reused for the next run leading to unexpected results. Fixes: 1cf1cae963c2 ("bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command") Reported-by: syzbot+709412e651e55ed96498@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Reported-by: syzbot+54f39d6ab58f39720a55@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-07-11 21:30:14 +08:00
}
}
memset(__skb_push(skb, hh_len), 0, hh_len);
}
bpf: support input __sk_buff context in BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN Add new set of arguments to bpf_attr for BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN: * ctx_in/ctx_size_in - input context * ctx_out/ctx_size_out - output context The intended use case is to pass some meta data to the test runs that operate on skb (this has being brought up on recent LPC). For programs that use bpf_prog_test_run_skb, support __sk_buff input and output. Initially, from input __sk_buff, copy _only_ cb and priority into skb, all other non-zero fields are prohibited (with EINVAL). If the user has set ctx_out/ctx_size_out, copy the potentially modified __sk_buff back to the userspace. We require all fields of input __sk_buff except the ones we explicitly support to be set to zero. The expectation is that in the future we might add support for more fields and we want to fail explicitly if the user runs the program on the kernel where we don't yet support them. The API is intentionally vague (i.e. we don't explicitly add __sk_buff to bpf_attr, but ctx_in) to potentially let other test_run types use this interface in the future (this can be xdp_md for xdp types for example). v4: * don't copy more than allowed in bpf_ctx_init [Martin] v3: * handle case where ctx_in is NULL, but ctx_out is not [Martin] * convert size==0 checks to ptr==NULL checks and add some extra ptr checks [Martin] v2: * Addressed comments from Martin Lau Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-04-10 02:49:09 +08:00
convert_skb_to___skb(skb, ctx);
bpf: fix panic due to oob in bpf_prog_test_run_skb sykzaller triggered several panics similar to the below: [...] [ 248.851531] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in _copy_to_user+0x5c/0x90 [ 248.857656] Read of size 985 at addr ffff8808017ffff2 by task a.out/1425 [...] [ 248.865902] CPU: 1 PID: 1425 Comm: a.out Not tainted 4.18.0-rc4+ #13 [ 248.865903] Hardware name: Supermicro SYS-5039MS-H12TRF/X11SSE-F, BIOS 2.1a 03/08/2018 [ 248.865905] Call Trace: [ 248.865910] dump_stack+0xd6/0x185 [ 248.865911] ? show_regs_print_info+0xb/0xb [ 248.865913] ? printk+0x9c/0xc3 [ 248.865915] ? kmsg_dump_rewind_nolock+0xe4/0xe4 [ 248.865919] print_address_description+0x6f/0x270 [ 248.865920] kasan_report+0x25b/0x380 [ 248.865922] ? _copy_to_user+0x5c/0x90 [ 248.865924] check_memory_region+0x137/0x190 [ 248.865925] kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20 [ 248.865927] _copy_to_user+0x5c/0x90 [ 248.865930] bpf_test_finish.isra.8+0x4f/0xc0 [ 248.865932] bpf_prog_test_run_skb+0x6a0/0xba0 [...] After scrubbing the BPF prog a bit from the noise, turns out it called bpf_skb_change_head() for the lwt_xmit prog with headroom of 2. Nothing wrong in that, however, this was run with repeat >> 0 in bpf_prog_test_run_skb() and the same skb thus keeps changing until the pskb_expand_head() called from skb_cow() keeps bailing out in atomic alloc context with -ENOMEM. So upon return we'll basically have 0 headroom left yet blindly do the __skb_push() of 14 bytes and keep copying data from there in bpf_test_finish() out of bounds. Fix to check if we have enough headroom and if pskb_expand_head() fails, bail out with error. Another bug independent of this fix (but related in triggering above) is that BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN should be reworked to reset the skb/xdp buffer to it's original state from input as otherwise repeating the same test in a loop won't work for benchmarking when underlying input buffer is getting changed by the prog each time and reused for the next run leading to unexpected results. Fixes: 1cf1cae963c2 ("bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command") Reported-by: syzbot+709412e651e55ed96498@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Reported-by: syzbot+54f39d6ab58f39720a55@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-07-11 21:30:14 +08:00
bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
size = skb->len;
/* bpf program can never convert linear skb to non-linear */
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(skb_is_nonlinear(skb)))
size = skb_headlen(skb);
ret = bpf_test_finish(kattr, uattr, skb->data, size, retval, duration);
bpf: support input __sk_buff context in BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN Add new set of arguments to bpf_attr for BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN: * ctx_in/ctx_size_in - input context * ctx_out/ctx_size_out - output context The intended use case is to pass some meta data to the test runs that operate on skb (this has being brought up on recent LPC). For programs that use bpf_prog_test_run_skb, support __sk_buff input and output. Initially, from input __sk_buff, copy _only_ cb and priority into skb, all other non-zero fields are prohibited (with EINVAL). If the user has set ctx_out/ctx_size_out, copy the potentially modified __sk_buff back to the userspace. We require all fields of input __sk_buff except the ones we explicitly support to be set to zero. The expectation is that in the future we might add support for more fields and we want to fail explicitly if the user runs the program on the kernel where we don't yet support them. The API is intentionally vague (i.e. we don't explicitly add __sk_buff to bpf_attr, but ctx_in) to potentially let other test_run types use this interface in the future (this can be xdp_md for xdp types for example). v4: * don't copy more than allowed in bpf_ctx_init [Martin] v3: * handle case where ctx_in is NULL, but ctx_out is not [Martin] * convert size==0 checks to ptr==NULL checks and add some extra ptr checks [Martin] v2: * Addressed comments from Martin Lau Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-04-10 02:49:09 +08:00
if (!ret)
ret = bpf_ctx_finish(kattr, uattr, ctx,
sizeof(struct __sk_buff));
out:
if (dev && dev != net->loopback_dev)
dev_put(dev);
bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
kfree_skb(skb);
bpf: Introduce bpf sk local storage After allowing a bpf prog to - directly read the skb->sk ptr - get the fullsock bpf_sock by "bpf_sk_fullsock()" - get the bpf_tcp_sock by "bpf_tcp_sock()" - get the listener sock by "bpf_get_listener_sock()" - avoid duplicating the fields of "(bpf_)sock" and "(bpf_)tcp_sock" into different bpf running context. this patch is another effort to make bpf's network programming more intuitive to do (together with memory and performance benefit). When bpf prog needs to store data for a sk, the current practice is to define a map with the usual 4-tuples (src/dst ip/port) as the key. If multiple bpf progs require to store different sk data, multiple maps have to be defined. Hence, wasting memory to store the duplicated keys (i.e. 4 tuples here) in each of the bpf map. [ The smallest key could be the sk pointer itself which requires some enhancement in the verifier and it is a separate topic. ] Also, the bpf prog needs to clean up the elem when sk is freed. Otherwise, the bpf map will become full and un-usable quickly. The sk-free tracking currently could be done during sk state transition (e.g. BPF_SOCK_OPS_STATE_CB). The size of the map needs to be predefined which then usually ended-up with an over-provisioned map in production. Even the map was re-sizable, while the sk naturally come and go away already, this potential re-size operation is arguably redundant if the data can be directly connected to the sk itself instead of proxy-ing through a bpf map. This patch introduces sk->sk_bpf_storage to provide local storage space at sk for bpf prog to use. The space will be allocated when the first bpf prog has created data for this particular sk. The design optimizes the bpf prog's lookup (and then optionally followed by an inline update). bpf_spin_lock should be used if the inline update needs to be protected. BPF_MAP_TYPE_SK_STORAGE: ----------------------- To define a bpf "sk-local-storage", a BPF_MAP_TYPE_SK_STORAGE map (new in this patch) needs to be created. Multiple BPF_MAP_TYPE_SK_STORAGE maps can be created to fit different bpf progs' needs. The map enforces BTF to allow printing the sk-local-storage during a system-wise sk dump (e.g. "ss -ta") in the future. The purpose of a BPF_MAP_TYPE_SK_STORAGE map is not for lookup/update/delete a "sk-local-storage" data from a particular sk. Think of the map as a meta-data (or "type") of a "sk-local-storage". This particular "type" of "sk-local-storage" data can then be stored in any sk. The main purposes of this map are mostly: 1. Define the size of a "sk-local-storage" type. 2. Provide a similar syscall userspace API as the map (e.g. lookup/update, map-id, map-btf...etc.) 3. Keep track of all sk's storages of this "type" and clean them up when the map is freed. sk->sk_bpf_storage: ------------------ The main lookup/update/delete is done on sk->sk_bpf_storage (which is a "struct bpf_sk_storage"). When doing a lookup, the "map" pointer is now used as the "key" to search on the sk_storage->list. The "map" pointer is actually serving as the "type" of the "sk-local-storage" that is being requested. To allow very fast lookup, it should be as fast as looking up an array at a stable-offset. At the same time, it is not ideal to set a hard limit on the number of sk-local-storage "type" that the system can have. Hence, this patch takes a cache approach. The last search result from sk_storage->list is cached in sk_storage->cache[] which is a stable sized array. Each "sk-local-storage" type has a stable offset to the cache[] array. In the future, a map's flag could be introduced to do cache opt-out/enforcement if it became necessary. The cache size is 16 (i.e. 16 types of "sk-local-storage"). Programs can share map. On the program side, having a few bpf_progs running in the networking hotpath is already a lot. The bpf_prog should have already consolidated the existing sock-key-ed map usage to minimize the map lookup penalty. 16 has enough runway to grow. All sk-local-storage data will be removed from sk->sk_bpf_storage during sk destruction. bpf_sk_storage_get() and bpf_sk_storage_delete(): ------------------------------------------------ Instead of using bpf_map_(lookup|update|delete)_elem(), the bpf prog needs to use the new helper bpf_sk_storage_get() and bpf_sk_storage_delete(). The verifier can then enforce the ARG_PTR_TO_SOCKET argument. The bpf_sk_storage_get() also allows to "create" new elem if one does not exist in the sk. It is done by the new BPF_SK_STORAGE_GET_F_CREATE flag. An optional value can also be provided as the initial value during BPF_SK_STORAGE_GET_F_CREATE. The BPF_MAP_TYPE_SK_STORAGE also supports bpf_spin_lock. Together, it has eliminated the potential use cases for an equivalent bpf_map_update_elem() API (for bpf_prog) in this patch. Misc notes: ---------- 1. map_get_next_key is not supported. From the userspace syscall perspective, the map has the socket fd as the key while the map can be shared by pinned-file or map-id. Since btf is enforced, the existing "ss" could be enhanced to pretty print the local-storage. Supporting a kernel defined btf with 4 tuples as the return key could be explored later also. 2. The sk->sk_lock cannot be acquired. Atomic operations is used instead. e.g. cmpxchg is done on the sk->sk_bpf_storage ptr. Please refer to the source code comments for the details in synchronization cases and considerations. 3. The mem is charged to the sk->sk_omem_alloc as the sk filter does. Benchmark: --------- Here is the benchmark data collected by turning on the "kernel.bpf_stats_enabled" sysctl. Two bpf progs are tested: One bpf prog with the usual bpf hashmap (max_entries = 8192) with the sk ptr as the key. (verifier is modified to support sk ptr as the key That should have shortened the key lookup time.) Another bpf prog is with the new BPF_MAP_TYPE_SK_STORAGE. Both are storing a "u32 cnt", do a lookup on "egress_skb/cgroup" for each egress skb and then bump the cnt. netperf is used to drive data with 4096 connected UDP sockets. BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH with a modifier verifier (152ns per bpf run) 27: cgroup_skb name egress_sk_map tag 74f56e832918070b run_time_ns 58280107540 run_cnt 381347633 loaded_at 2019-04-15T13:46:39-0700 uid 0 xlated 344B jited 258B memlock 4096B map_ids 16 btf_id 5 BPF_MAP_TYPE_SK_STORAGE in this patch (66ns per bpf run) 30: cgroup_skb name egress_sk_stora tag d4aa70984cc7bbf6 run_time_ns 25617093319 run_cnt 390989739 loaded_at 2019-04-15T13:47:54-0700 uid 0 xlated 168B jited 156B memlock 4096B map_ids 17 btf_id 6 Here is a high-level picture on how are the objects organized: sk ┌──────┐ │ │ │ │ │ │ │*sk_bpf_storage─────▶ bpf_sk_storage └──────┘ ┌───────┐ ┌───────────┤ list │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ └───────┘ │ │ elem │ ┌────────┐ ├─▶│ snode │ │ ├────────┤ │ │ data │ bpf_map │ ├────────┤ ┌─────────┐ │ │map_node│◀─┬─────┤ list │ │ └────────┘ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ elem │ │ │ │ ┌────────┐ │ └─────────┘ └─▶│ snode │ │ ├────────┤ │ bpf_map │ data │ │ ┌─────────┐ ├────────┤ │ │ list ├───────▶│map_node│ │ │ │ └────────┘ │ │ │ │ │ │ elem │ └─────────┘ ┌────────┐ │ ┌─▶│ snode │ │ │ ├────────┤ │ │ │ data │ │ │ ├────────┤ │ │ │map_node│◀─┘ │ └────────┘ │ │ │ ┌───────┐ sk └──────────│ list │ ┌──────┐ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ └───────┘ │*sk_bpf_storage───────▶bpf_sk_storage └──────┘ Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2019-04-27 07:39:39 +08:00
bpf_sk_storage_free(sk);
kfree(sk);
bpf: support input __sk_buff context in BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN Add new set of arguments to bpf_attr for BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN: * ctx_in/ctx_size_in - input context * ctx_out/ctx_size_out - output context The intended use case is to pass some meta data to the test runs that operate on skb (this has being brought up on recent LPC). For programs that use bpf_prog_test_run_skb, support __sk_buff input and output. Initially, from input __sk_buff, copy _only_ cb and priority into skb, all other non-zero fields are prohibited (with EINVAL). If the user has set ctx_out/ctx_size_out, copy the potentially modified __sk_buff back to the userspace. We require all fields of input __sk_buff except the ones we explicitly support to be set to zero. The expectation is that in the future we might add support for more fields and we want to fail explicitly if the user runs the program on the kernel where we don't yet support them. The API is intentionally vague (i.e. we don't explicitly add __sk_buff to bpf_attr, but ctx_in) to potentially let other test_run types use this interface in the future (this can be xdp_md for xdp types for example). v4: * don't copy more than allowed in bpf_ctx_init [Martin] v3: * handle case where ctx_in is NULL, but ctx_out is not [Martin] * convert size==0 checks to ptr==NULL checks and add some extra ptr checks [Martin] v2: * Addressed comments from Martin Lau Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-04-10 02:49:09 +08:00
kfree(ctx);
bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
return ret;
}
int bpf_prog_test_run_xdp(struct bpf_prog *prog, const union bpf_attr *kattr,
union bpf_attr __user *uattr)
{
u32 tailroom = SKB_DATA_ALIGN(sizeof(struct skb_shared_info));
u32 headroom = XDP_PACKET_HEADROOM;
bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
u32 size = kattr->test.data_size_in;
u32 repeat = kattr->test.repeat;
struct netdev_rx_queue *rxqueue;
bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
struct xdp_buff xdp = {};
u32 retval, duration;
u32 max_data_sz;
bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
void *data;
int ret;
if (kattr->test.ctx_in || kattr->test.ctx_out)
return -EINVAL;
/* XDP have extra tailroom as (most) drivers use full page */
max_data_sz = 4096 - headroom - tailroom;
data = bpf_test_init(kattr, max_data_sz, headroom, tailroom);
bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
if (IS_ERR(data))
return PTR_ERR(data);
rxqueue = __netif_get_rx_queue(current->nsproxy->net_ns->loopback_dev, 0);
xdp_init_buff(&xdp, headroom + max_data_sz + tailroom,
&rxqueue->xdp_rxq);
xdp_prepare_buff(&xdp, data, headroom, size, true);
bpf_prog_change_xdp(NULL, prog);
ret = bpf_test_run(prog, &xdp, repeat, &retval, &duration, true);
if (ret)
goto out;
if (xdp.data != data + headroom || xdp.data_end != xdp.data + size)
bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
size = xdp.data_end - xdp.data;
ret = bpf_test_finish(kattr, uattr, xdp.data, size, retval, duration);
out:
bpf_prog_change_xdp(prog, NULL);
bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome. Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is the ultimate authority and execution environment. Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth, qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest, attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host while capturing the results from the guest. Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing, so performance testing can only be done on physical nic with another server generating traffic. Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs stubbed out for testing. Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated. To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command to test and performance benchmark bpf programs. Joint work with Daniel Borkmann. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-31 12:45:38 +08:00
kfree(data);
return ret;
}
static int verify_user_bpf_flow_keys(struct bpf_flow_keys *ctx)
{
/* make sure the fields we don't use are zeroed */
if (!range_is_zero(ctx, 0, offsetof(struct bpf_flow_keys, flags)))
return -EINVAL;
/* flags is allowed */
if (!range_is_zero(ctx, offsetofend(struct bpf_flow_keys, flags),
sizeof(struct bpf_flow_keys)))
return -EINVAL;
return 0;
}
int bpf_prog_test_run_flow_dissector(struct bpf_prog *prog,
const union bpf_attr *kattr,
union bpf_attr __user *uattr)
{
u32 size = kattr->test.data_size_in;
struct bpf_flow_dissector ctx = {};
u32 repeat = kattr->test.repeat;
struct bpf_flow_keys *user_ctx;
struct bpf_flow_keys flow_keys;
u64 time_start, time_spent = 0;
const struct ethhdr *eth;
unsigned int flags = 0;
u32 retval, duration;
void *data;
int ret;
u32 i;
if (prog->type != BPF_PROG_TYPE_FLOW_DISSECTOR)
return -EINVAL;
if (kattr->test.flags || kattr->test.cpu)
return -EINVAL;
if (size < ETH_HLEN)
return -EINVAL;
data = bpf_test_init(kattr, size, 0, 0);
if (IS_ERR(data))
return PTR_ERR(data);
eth = (struct ethhdr *)data;
if (!repeat)
repeat = 1;
user_ctx = bpf_ctx_init(kattr, sizeof(struct bpf_flow_keys));
if (IS_ERR(user_ctx)) {
kfree(data);
return PTR_ERR(user_ctx);
}
if (user_ctx) {
ret = verify_user_bpf_flow_keys(user_ctx);
if (ret)
goto out;
flags = user_ctx->flags;
}
ctx.flow_keys = &flow_keys;
ctx.data = data;
ctx.data_end = (__u8 *)data + size;
rcu_read_lock();
preempt_disable();
time_start = ktime_get_ns();
for (i = 0; i < repeat; i++) {
retval = bpf_flow_dissect(prog, &ctx, eth->h_proto, ETH_HLEN,
size, flags);
if (signal_pending(current)) {
preempt_enable();
rcu_read_unlock();
ret = -EINTR;
goto out;
}
if (need_resched()) {
time_spent += ktime_get_ns() - time_start;
preempt_enable();
rcu_read_unlock();
cond_resched();
rcu_read_lock();
preempt_disable();
time_start = ktime_get_ns();
}
}
time_spent += ktime_get_ns() - time_start;
preempt_enable();
rcu_read_unlock();
do_div(time_spent, repeat);
duration = time_spent > U32_MAX ? U32_MAX : (u32)time_spent;
ret = bpf_test_finish(kattr, uattr, &flow_keys, sizeof(flow_keys),
retval, duration);
if (!ret)
ret = bpf_ctx_finish(kattr, uattr, user_ctx,
sizeof(struct bpf_flow_keys));
out:
kfree(user_ctx);
kfree(data);
return ret;
}