This function is an 80-column eyesore, quite unnecessarily. Clean that
up, and use standard comment layout style.
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Greg Pearson <greg.pearson@hp.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
memblock_free_reserved_regions() calls memblock_free(), but
memblock_free() would double reserved.regions too, so we could free the
old range for reserved.regions.
Also tj said there is another bug which could be related to this.
| I don't think we're saving any noticeable
| amount by doing this "free - give it to page allocator - reserve
| again" dancing. We should just allocate regions aligned to page
| boundaries and free them later when memblock is no longer in use.
in that case, when DEBUG_PAGEALLOC, will get panic:
memblock_free: [0x0000102febc080-0x0000102febf080] memblock_free_reserved_regions+0x37/0x39
BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffff88102febd948
IP: [<ffffffff836a5774>] __next_free_mem_range+0x9b/0x155
PGD 4826063 PUD cf67a067 PMD cf7fa067 PTE 800000102febd160
Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
CPU 0
Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 3.5.0-rc2-next-20120614-sasha #447
RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff836a5774>] [<ffffffff836a5774>] __next_free_mem_range+0x9b/0x155
See the discussion at https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/6/13/469
So try to allocate with PAGE_SIZE alignment and free it later.
Reported-by: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
__alloc_memory_core_early() asks memblock for a range of memory then try
to reserve it. If the reserved region array lacks space for the new
range, memblock_double_array() is called to allocate more space for the
array. If memblock is used to allocate memory for the new array it can
end up using a range that overlaps with the range originally allocated in
__alloc_memory_core_early(), leading to possible data corruption.
With this patch memblock_double_array() now calls memblock_find_in_range()
with a narrowed candidate range (in cases where the reserved.regions array
is being doubled) so any memory allocated will not overlap with the
original range that was being reserved. The range is narrowed by passing
in the starting address and size of the previously allocated range. Then
the range above the ending address is searched and if a candidate is not
found, the range below the starting address is searched.
Signed-off-by: Greg Pearson <greg.pearson@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Fix kernel-doc warnings such as
Warning(../mm/page_cgroup.c:432): No description found for parameter 'id'
Warning(../mm/page_cgroup.c:432): Excess function parameter 'mem' description in 'swap_cgroup_record'
Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <liwp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
At first glance one would think that memblock_is_region_memory()
and memblock_is_region_reserved() would be implemented in the
same way. Unfortunately they aren't and the former returns
whether the region specified is a subset of a memory bank while
the latter returns whether the region specified intersects with
reserved memory.
Document the two functions so that users aren't tempted to
make the implementation the same between them and to clarify the
purpose of the functions.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1337845521-32755-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
The overall memblock has been organized into the memory regions and
reserved regions. Initially, the memory regions and reserved regions are
stored in the predetermined arrays of "struct memblock _region". It's
possible for the arrays to be enlarged when we have newly added regions,
but no free space left there. The policy here is to create double-sized
array either by slab allocator or memblock allocator. Unfortunately, we
didn't free the old array, which might be allocated through slab allocator
before. That would cause memory leak.
The patch introduces 2 variables to trace where (slab or memblock) the
memory and reserved regions come from. The memory for the memory or
reserved regions will be deallocated by kfree() if that was allocated by
slab allocator. Thus to fix the memory leak issue.
Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
The overall memblock has been organized into the memory regions and
reserved regions. Initially, the memory regions and reserved regions are
stored in the predetermined arrays of "struct memblock _region". It's
possible for the arrays to be enlarged when we have newly added regions
for them, but no enough space there. Under the situation, We will created
double-sized array to meet the requirement. However, the original
implementation converted the VA (Virtual Address) of the newly allocated
array of regions to PA (Physical Address), then translate back when we
allocates the new array from slab. That's actually unnecessary.
The patch removes the duplicate VA/PA conversion.
Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Commit 24aa07882b ("memblock, x86: Replace memblock_x86_reserve/
free_range() with generic ones") replaced x86 specific memblock
operations with the generic ones; unfortunately, it lost zero length
operation handling in the process making the kernel panic if somebody
tries to reserve zero length area.
There isn't much to be gained by being cranky to zero length operations
and panicking is almost the worst response. Drop the BUG_ON() in
memblock_reserve() and update memblock_add_region/isolate_range() so
that all zero length operations are handled as noops.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: Valere Monseur <valere.monseur@ymail.com>
Bisected-by: Joseph Freeman <jfree143dev@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Joseph Freeman <jfree143dev@gmail.com>
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43098
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
memblock allocator aligns @size to @align to reduce the amount
of fragmentation. Commit:
7bd0b0f0da ("memblock: Reimplement memblock allocation using reverse free area iterator")
Broke it by incorrectly relocating @size aligning to
memblock_find_in_range_node(). As the aligned size is not
propagated back to memblock_alloc_base_nid(), the actually
reserved size isn't aligned.
While this increases memory use for memblock reserved array,
this shouldn't cause any critical failure; however, it seems
that the size aligning was hiding a use-beyond-allocation bug in
sparc64 and losing the aligning causes boot failure.
The underlying problem is currently being debugged but this is a
proper fix in itself, it's already pretty late in -rc cycle for
boot failures and reverting the change for debugging isn't
difficult. Restore the size aligning moving it to
memblock_alloc_base_nid().
Reported-by: Meelis Roos <mroos@linux.ee>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20120228205621.GC3252@dhcp-172-17-108-109.mtv.corp.google.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
LKML-Reference: <alpine.SOC.1.00.1202130942030.1488@math.ut.ee>
7bd0b0f0da ("memblock: Reimplement memblock allocation using
reverse free area iterator") implemented a simple top-down
allocator using a reverse memblock iterator. To avoid underflow
in the allocator loop, it simply raised the lower boundary to
the requested size under the assumption that requested size
would be far smaller than available memblocks.
This causes early page table allocation failure under certain
configurations in Xen. Fix it by checking for underflow directly
instead of bumping up lower bound.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reported-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: rjw@sisk.pl
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20120113181412.GA11112@google.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Now that all early memory information is in memblock when enabled, we
can implement reverse free area iterator and use it to implement NUMA
aware allocator which is then wrapped for simpler variants instead of
the confusing and inefficient mending of information in separate NUMA
aware allocator.
Implement for_each_free_mem_range_reverse(), use it to reimplement
memblock_find_in_range_node() which in turn is used by all allocators.
The visible allocator interface is inconsistent and can probably use
some cleanup too.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Now all ARCH_POPULATES_NODE_MAP archs select HAVE_MEBLOCK_NODE_MAP -
there's no user of early_node_map[] left. Kill early_node_map[] and
replace ARCH_POPULATES_NODE_MAP with HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP. Also,
relocate for_each_mem_pfn_range() and helper from mm.h to memblock.h
as page_alloc.c would no longer host an alternative implementation.
This change is ultimately one to one mapping and shouldn't cause any
observable difference; however, after the recent changes, there are
some functions which now would fit memblock.c better than page_alloc.c
and dependency on HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP instead of HAVE_MEMBLOCK
doesn't make much sense on some of them. Further cleanups for
functions inside HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP in mm.h would be nice.
-v2: Fix compile bug introduced by mis-spelling
CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP to CONFIG_MEMBLOCK_HAVE_NODE_MAP in
mmzone.h. Reported by Stephen Rothwell.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Chen Liqin <liqin.chen@sunplusct.com>
Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Implement memblock_add_node() which can add a new memblock memory
region with specific node ID.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
The only function of memblock_analyze() is now allowing resize of
memblock region arrays. Rename it to memblock_allow_resize() and
update its users.
* The following users remain the same other than renaming.
arm/mm/init.c::arm_memblock_init()
microblaze/kernel/prom.c::early_init_devtree()
powerpc/kernel/prom.c::early_init_devtree()
openrisc/kernel/prom.c::early_init_devtree()
sh/mm/init.c::paging_init()
sparc/mm/init_64.c::paging_init()
unicore32/mm/init.c::uc32_memblock_init()
* In the following users, analyze was used to update total size which
is no longer necessary.
powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec.c::reserve_crashkernel()
powerpc/kernel/prom.c::early_init_devtree()
powerpc/mm/init_32.c::MMU_init()
powerpc/mm/tlb_nohash.c::__early_init_mmu()
powerpc/platforms/ps3/mm.c::ps3_mm_add_memory()
powerpc/platforms/embedded6xx/wii.c::wii_memory_fixups()
sh/kernel/machine_kexec.c::reserve_crashkernel()
* x86/kernel/e820.c::memblock_x86_fill() was directly setting
memblock_can_resize before populating memblock and calling analyze
afterwards. Call memblock_allow_resize() before start populating.
memblock_can_resize is now static inside memblock.c.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Guan Xuetao <gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Total size of memory regions was calculated by memblock_analyze()
requiring explicitly calling the function between operations which can
change memory regions and possible users of total size, which is
cumbersome and fragile.
This patch makes each memblock_type track total size automatically
with minor modifications to memblock manipulation functions and remove
requirements on calling memblock_analyze(). [__]memblock_dump_all()
now also dumps the total size of reserved regions.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
With recent updates, the basic memblock operations are robust enough
that there's no reason for memblock_enfore_memory_limit() to directly
manipulate memblock region arrays. Reimplement it using
__memblock_remove().
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Allow memblock users to specify range where @base + @size overflows
and automatically cap it at maximum. This makes the interface more
robust and specifying till-the-end-of-memory easier.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
__memblock_remove()'s open coded region manipulation can be trivially
replaced with memblock_islate_range(). This increases code sharing
and eases improving region tracking.
This pulls memblock_isolate_range() out of HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP.
Make it use memblock_get_region_node() instead of assuming rgn->nid is
available.
-v2: Fixed build failure on !HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP caused by direct
rgn->nid access.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
memblock_set_node() operates in three steps - break regions crossing
boundaries, set nid and merge back regions. This patch separates the
first part into a separate function - memblock_isolate_range(), which
breaks regions crossing range boundaries and returns range index range
for regions properly contained in the specified memory range.
This doesn't introduce any behavior change and will be used to further
unify region handling.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
memblock_init() initializes arrays for regions and memblock itself;
however, all these can be done with struct initializers and
memblock_init() can be removed. This patch kills memblock_init() and
initializes memblock with struct initializer.
The only difference is that the first dummy entries don't have .nid
set to MAX_NUMNODES initially. This doesn't cause any behavior
difference.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Guan Xuetao <gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
memblock no longer depends on having one more entry at the end during
addition making the sentinel entries at the end of region arrays not
too useful. Remove the sentinels. This eases further updates.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Add __memblock_dump_all() which dumps memblock configuration whether
memblock_debug is enabled or not.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Make memblock_double_array(), __memblock_alloc_base() and
memblock_alloc_nid() use memblock_reserve() instead of calling
memblock_add_region() with reserved array directly. This eases
debugging and updates to memblock_add_region().
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
memblock_{add|remove|free|reserve}() return either 0 or -errno but had
long as return type. Chage it to int. Also, drop 'extern' from all
prototypes in memblock.h - they are unnecessary and used
inconsistently (especially if mm.h is included in the picture).
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Conflicts & resolutions:
* arch/x86/xen/setup.c
dc91c728fd "xen: allow extra memory to be in multiple regions"
24aa07882b "memblock, x86: Replace memblock_x86_reserve/free..."
conflicted on xen_add_extra_mem() updates. The resolution is
trivial as the latter just want to replace
memblock_x86_reserve_range() with memblock_reserve().
* drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c
166e9278a3 "x86/ia64: intel-iommu: move to drivers/iommu/"
5dfe8660a3 "bootmem: Replace work_with_active_regions() with..."
conflicted as the former moved the file under drivers/iommu/.
Resolved by applying the chnages from the latter on the moved
file.
* mm/Kconfig
6661672053 "memblock: add NO_BOOTMEM config symbol"
c378ddd53f "memblock, x86: Make ARCH_DISCARD_MEMBLOCK a config option"
conflicted trivially. Both added config options. Just
letting both add their own options resolves the conflict.
* mm/memblock.c
d1f0ece6cd "mm/memblock.c: small function definition fixes"
ed7b56a799 "memblock: Remove memblock_memory_can_coalesce()"
confliected. The former updates function removed by the
latter. Resolution is trivial.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Quiet the following sparse noise in this file:
warning: symbol 'memblock_overlaps_region' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers,com>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@nokia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
warning: function 'memblock_memory_can_coalesce'
with external linkage has definition.
Signed-off-by: Jonghwan Choi <jhbird.choi@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
SPARC32 require access to the start address. Add a new helper
memblock_start_of_DRAM() to give access to the address of the first
memblock - which contains the lowest address.
The awkward name was chosen to match the already present
memblock_end_of_DRAM().
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
RED_INACTIVE is a slab thing, and reusing it for memblock was
inappropriate, because memblock is dealing with phys_addr_t's which have a
Kconfigurable sizeof().
Create a new poison type for this application. Fixes the sparse warning
warning: cast truncates bits from constant value (9f911029d74e35b becomes 9d74e35b)
Reported-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hartleys@visionengravers.com>
Tested-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hartleys@visionengravers.com>
Acked-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
phys_addr_t is not necessarily the same thing as unsigned long long.
It is, however, easier to cast it to unsigned long long for printf
purposes than it is to deal with differnent printf formats.
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/4E1F4D2C.3000507@zytor.com
Other than sanity check and debug message, the x86 specific version of
memblock reserve/free functions are simple wrappers around the generic
versions - memblock_reserve/free().
This patch adds debug messages with caller identification to the
generic versions and replaces x86 specific ones and kills them.
arch/x86/include/asm/memblock.h and arch/x86/mm/memblock.c are empty
after this change and removed.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1310462166-31469-14-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
From 6839454ae63f1eb21e515c10229ca95c22955fec Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 11:22:17 +0200
Make ARCH_DISCARD_MEMBLOCK a config option so that it can be handled
together with other MEMBLOCK options.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20110714094603.GH3455@htj.dyndns.org
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
Implement for_each_free_mem_range() which iterates over free memory
areas according to memblock (memory && !reserved). This will be used
to simplify memblock users.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1310462166-31469-7-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
From 83103b92f3234ec830852bbc5c45911bd6cbdb20 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 11:22:16 +0200
Add optional region->nid which can be enabled by arch using
CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP. When enabled, memblock also carries
NUMA node information and replaces early_node_map[].
Newly added memblocks have MAX_NUMNODES as nid. Arch can then call
memblock_set_node() to set node information. memblock takes care of
merging and node affine allocations w.r.t. node information.
When MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP is enabled, early_node_map[], related data
structures and functions to manipulate and iterate it are disabled.
memblock version of __next_mem_pfn_range() is provided such that
for_each_mem_pfn_range() behaves the same and its users don't have to
be updated.
-v2: Yinghai spotted section mismatch caused by missing
__init_memblock in memblock_set_node(). Fixed.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20110714094342.GF3455@htj.dyndns.org
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
memblock_add_region() carefully checked for merge and overlap
conditions while adding a new region, which is complicated and makes
it difficult to allow arbitrary overlaps or add more merge conditions
(e.g. node ID).
This re-implements memblock_add_region() such that insertion is done
in two steps - all non-overlapping portions of new area are inserted
as separate regions first and then memblock_merge_regions() scan and
merge all neighbouring compatible regions.
This makes addition logic simpler and more versatile and enables
adding node information to memblock.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1310462166-31469-3-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
Arch could implement memblock_memor_can_coalesce() to veto merging of
adjacent or overlapping memblock regions; however, no arch did and any
vetoing would trigger WARN_ON(). Memblock regions are supposed to
deal with proper memory anyway. Remove the unused hook.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1310462166-31469-2-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
Node affine memblock allocation logic is currently implemented across
memblock_alloc_nid() and memblock_alloc_nid_region(). This
reorganizes it such that it resembles that of non-NUMA allocation API.
Area finding is collected and moved into new exported function
memblock_find_in_range_node() which is symmetrical to non-NUMA
counterpart - it handles @start/@end and understands ANYWHERE and
ACCESSIBLE. memblock_alloc_nid() now simply calls
memblock_find_in_range_node() and reserves the returned area.
This makes memblock_alloc[_try]_nid() observe ACCESSIBLE limit on node
affine allocations too (again, this doesn't make any difference for
the current sole user - sparc64).
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1310460395-30913-8-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
NUMA aware memblock alloc functions - memblock_alloc_[try_]nid() -
weren't properly top-down because memblock_nid_range() scanned
forward. This patch reverses memblock_nid_range(), renames it to
memblock_nid_range_rev() and updates related functions to implement
proper top-down allocation.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1310460395-30913-7-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
memblock_nid_range() is used to implement memblock_[try_]alloc_nid().
The generic version determines the range by walking early_node_map
with for_each_mem_pfn_range(). The generic version is defined __weak
to allow arch override.
Currently, only sparc overrides it; however, with the previous update
to the generic implementation, there isn't much to be gained with arch
override. Sparc would behave exactly the same with the generic
implementation.
This patch disallows arch override for memblock_nid_range() and make
both generic and sparc versions static.
sparc is only compile tested.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1310460395-30913-6-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
Given an address range, memblock_nid_range() determines the node the
start of the range belongs to and upto where the range stays in the
same node.
It's implemented by calling get_pfn_range_for_nid(), which determines
min and max pfns for a given node, for each node and testing whether
start address falls in there. This is not only inefficient but also
incorrect when nodes interleave as min-max ranges for nodes overlap.
This patch reimplements memblock_nid_range() using
for_each_mem_pfn_range(). It's simpler, walks the mem ranges once and
can find the exact range the start address falls in.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1310460395-30913-5-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
memblock_find_base() is a static function with two callers in
memblock.c and memblock_find_in_range() is a wrapper around it which
just changes the types and order of parameters.
Make memblock_find_in_range() take phys_addr_t instead of u64 for
consistency and replace memblock_find_base() with it.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1310457490-3356-7-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
25818f0f28 (memblock: Make MEMBLOCK_ERROR be 0) thankfully made
MEMBLOCK_ERROR 0 and there already are codes which expect error return
to be 0. There's no point in keeping MEMBLOCK_ERROR around. End its
misery.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1310457490-3356-6-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
After node affine allocation fails, memblock_alloc_try_nid() calls
memblock_alloc_base() with @max_addr set to MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ANYWHERE.
This is inconsistent with memblock_alloc() and what the function's
sole user - sparc/mm/init_64 - expects, although it doesn't make any
difference as sparc64 doesn't have highmem and ACCESSIBLE equals
ANYWHERE.
This patch makes memblock_alloc_try_nid() use ACCESSIBLE instead of
ANYWHERE. This isn't complete as node affine allocation doesn't
consider memblock.current_limit. It will be handled with future
changes.
This patch doesn't introduce any behavior difference.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1310457490-3356-4-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
Currently memblock_reserve() or memblock_free() don't handle overlaps of
any kind. There is some special casing for coalescing exactly adjacent
regions but that's about it.
This is annoying because typically memblock_reserve() is used to mark
regions passed by the firmware as reserved and we all know how much we can
trust our firmwares...
Also, with the current code, if we do something it doesn't handle right
such as trying to memblock_reserve() a large range spanning multiple
existing smaller reserved regions for example, or doing overlapping
reservations, it can silently corrupt the internal region array, causing
odd errors much later on, such as allocations returning reserved regions
etc...
This patch rewrites the underlying functions that add or remove a region
to the arrays. The new code is a lot more robust as it fully handles
overlapping regions. It's also, imho, simpler than the previous
implementation.
In addition, while doing so, I found a bug where if we fail to double the
array while adding a region, we would remove the last region of the array
rather than the region we just allocated. This fixes it too.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
While applying patch to use memblock to find aperture for 64bit x86.
Ingo found system with 1g + force_iommu
> No AGP bridge found
> Node 0: aperture @ 38000000 size 32 MB
> Aperture pointing to e820 RAM. Ignoring.
> Your BIOS doesn't leave a aperture memory hole
> Please enable the IOMMU option in the BIOS setup
> This costs you 64 MB of RAM
> Cannot allocate aperture memory hole (0,65536K)
the corresponding code:
addr = memblock_find_in_range(0, 1ULL<<32, aper_size, 512ULL<<20);
if (addr == MEMBLOCK_ERROR || addr + aper_size > 0xffffffff) {
printk(KERN_ERR
"Cannot allocate aperture memory hole (%lx,%uK)\n",
addr, aper_size>>10);
return 0;
}
memblock_x86_reserve_range(addr, addr + aper_size, "aperture64")
fails because memblock core code align the size with 512M. That could
make size way too big.
So don't align the size in that case.
actually __memblock_alloc_base, the another caller already align that
before calling that function.
BTW. x86 does not use __memblock_alloc_base...
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
memblock_is_region_memory() uses reserved memblocks to search for the
given region, while it should use the memory memblocks.
I encountered the problem with OMAP's framebuffer ram allocation.
Normally the ram is allocated dynamically, and this function is not
called. However, if we want to pass the framebuffer from the bootloader
to the kernel (to retain the boot image), this function is used to check
the validity of the kernel parameters for the framebuffer ram area.
Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@nokia.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Stephen found
WARNING: mm/built-in.o(.text+0x25ab8): Section mismatch in reference from the function memblock_find_base() to the function .init.text:memblock_find_region()
The function memblock_find_base() references
the function __init memblock_find_region().
This is often because memblock_find_base lacks a __init
annotation or the annotation of memblock_find_region is wrong.
So let memblock_find_region() to use __init_memblock instead of __init
directly.
Also fix one function that did not have __init* to be __init_memblock.
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
LKML-Reference: <4CB366B1.40405@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
The Xen setup code needs to call memblock_x86_reserve_range() very early,
so allow it to initialize the memblock subsystem before doing so. The
second memblock_init() is ignored.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
LKML-Reference: <4CACFDAD.3090900@goop.org>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
Stephen found a bunch of section mismatch warnings with the
new memblock changes.
Use __init_memblock to replace __init in memblock.c and remove
__init in memblock.h. We should not use __init in header files.
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Tested-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <Yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
LKML-Reference: <4C912709.2090201@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
So we can avoid export memblock_reserved_init_regions()
Suggested by Ben.
-v2: use __init_memblock attribute
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
This is a wrapper for memblock_find_base() using slightly different
arguments (start,end instead of start,size for example) in order to
make it easier to convert existing arch/x86 code.
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Arch code can define ARCH_DISCARD_MEMBLOCK in asm/memblock.h,
which in turns causes memblock code and data to go respectively
into the .init and .initdata sections. This will be used by the
x86 architecture.
If ARCH_DISCARD_MEMBLOCK is defined, the debugfs files to inspect
the memblock arrays after boot are not created.
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
And ensure we don't hand out 0 as a valid allocation. We put the
low limit at PAGE_SIZE arbitrarily.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
will used by x86 memblock_x86_find_in_range_node and nobootmem replacement
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Print out the location info in addition to which array is being
resized. Also use memblocK_dbg() to put that under control of
the memblock_debug flag.
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
This exposes memblock_debug and associated memblock_dbg() macro,
along with memblock_can_resize so that x86 can use these when
ported to use memblock
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
memblock_alloc_nid() used to fallback to allocating anywhere by using
memblock_alloc() as a fallback.
However, some of my previous patches limit memblock_alloc() to the region
covered by MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE which is not quite what we want
for memblock_alloc_try_nid().
So we fix it by explicitely using MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ANYWHERE.
Not that so far only sparc uses memblock_alloc_nid() and it hasn't been updated
to clamp the accessible zone yet. Thus the temporary "breakage" should have
no effect.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
The former is now strict, it will fail if it cannot honor the allocation
within the node, while the later implements the previous semantic which
falls back to allocating anywhere.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
We now provide a default (weak) implementation of memblock_nid_range()
which uses the early_pfn_map[] if CONFIG_ARCH_POPULATES_NODE_MAP
is set. Sparc still needs to use its own method due to the way
the pages can be scattered between nodes.
This implementation is inefficient due to our main algorithm and
callback construct wanting to work on an ascending addresses bases
while early_pfn_map[] would rather work with nid's (it's unsorted
at that stage). But it should work and we can look into improving
it subsequently, possibly using arch compile options to chose a
different algorithm alltogether.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To constraint the search of a region between two boundaries,
which will be used by the new NUMA aware allocator among others.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Some archs such as ARM want to avoid coalescing accross things such
as the lowmem/highmem boundary or similar. This provides the option
to control it via an arch callback for which a weak default is provided
which always allows coalescing.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
When one of the array gets full, we resize it. After much thinking and
a few iterations of that code, I went back to on-demand resizing using
the (new) internal memblock_find_base() function, which is pretty much what
Yinghai initially proposed, though there some differences in the details.
To work this relies on the default alloc limit being set sensibly by
the architecture.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Some shuffling is needed for doing array resize so we may as well
put some sense into the ordering of the functions in the whole memblock.c
file. No code change. Added some comments.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
This will be used by the array resize code and might prove useful
to some arch code as well at which point it can be made non-static.
Also add comment as to why aligning size is important
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
---
v2. Fix loss of size alignment
v3. Fix result code
This function will be used to locate a free area to put the new memblock
arrays when attempting to resize them. memblock_alloc_region() is gone,
the two callsites now call memblock_add_region().
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
---
v2. Fix membase_alloc_nid_region() conversion
Since we allocate one more than needed, why not do a bit of sanity checking
here to ensure we don't walk past the end of the array ?
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
This is in preparation for having resizable arrays.
Note that we still allocate one more than needed, this is unchanged from
the previous implementation.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Right now, both the "memory" and "reserved" memblock_type structures have
a "size" member. It represents the calculated memory size in the former
case and is unused in the latter.
This moves it out to the main memblock structure instead
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Let's not waste space and cycles on archs that don't support >32-bit
physical address space.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
The RMA (RMO is a misnomer) is a concept specific to ppc64 (in fact
server ppc64 though I hijack it on embedded ppc64 for similar purposes)
and represents the area of memory that can be accessed in real mode
(aka with MMU off), or on embedded, from the exception vectors (which
is bolted in the TLB) which pretty much boils down to the same thing.
We take that out of the generic MEMBLOCK data structure and move it into
arch/powerpc where it belongs, renaming it to "RMA" while at it.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
This introduce memblock.current_limit which is used to limit allocations
from memblock_alloc() or memblock_alloc_base(..., MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE).
The old MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ANYWHERE changes value from 0 to ~(u64)0 and can still
be used with memblock_alloc_base() to allocate really anywhere.
It is -no-longer- cropped to MEMBLOCK_REAL_LIMIT which disappears.
Note to archs: I'm leaving the default limit to MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ANYWHERE. I
strongly recommend that you ensure that you set an appropriate limit
during boot in order to guarantee that an memblock_alloc() at any time
results in something that is accessible with a simple __va().
The reason is that a subsequent patch will introduce the ability for
the array to resize itself by reallocating itself. The MEMBLOCK core will
honor the current limit when performing those allocations.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To make it fast, we steal ARM's binary search for memblock_is_memory()
and we use that to also the replace existing implementation of
memblock_is_reserved().
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
All callers expect a boolean result which is true if the region
overlaps a reserved region. However, the implementation actually
returns -1 if there is no overlap, and a region index (0 based)
if there is.
Make it behave as callers (and common sense) expect.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
via following scripts
FILES=$(find * -type f | grep -vE 'oprofile|[^K]config')
sed -i \
-e 's/lmb/memblock/g' \
-e 's/LMB/MEMBLOCK/g' \
$FILES
for N in $(find . -name lmb.[ch]); do
M=$(echo $N | sed 's/lmb/memblock/g')
mv $N $M
done
and remove some wrong change like lmbench and dlmb etc.
also move memblock.c from lib/ to mm/
Suggested-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Acked-by: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Acked-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Acked-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Andrew Morton