This function is internal to btrfs and doesn't really deal with any
VFS members, as such it needn't take a struct inode refrence but
btrfs_inode.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <n.borisov.lkml@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Currently btrfs_ino takes a struct inode and this causes a lot of
internal btrfs functions which consume this ino to take a VFS inode,
rather than btrfs' own struct btrfs_inode. In order to fix this "leak"
of VFS structs into the internals of btrfs first it's necessary to
eliminate all uses of struct inode for the purpose of inode. This patch
does that by using BTRFS_I to convert an inode to btrfs_inode. With
this problem eliminated subsequent patches will start eliminating the
passing of struct inode altogether, eventually resulting in a lot cleaner
code.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <n.borisov.lkml@gmail.com>
[ fix btrfs_get_extent tracepoint prototype ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The expression is open-coded in several places, this asks for a wrapper.
As we know the MAX_EXTENT fits to u32, we can use the appropirate
division helper. This cascades to the result type updates.
Compiler is clever enough to use shift instead of integer division, so
there's no change in the generated assembly.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
A proposed patch in https://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=147859791003837
pointed out bad limit threshold in cow_file_range_async, but it turned
out that the whole logic is not necessary and is done by writeback. We
agreed to remove it.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
As of now writes smaller than 64k for non compressed extents and 16k
for compressed extents inside eof are considered as candidate
for auto defrag, put them together at a place.
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Since btrfs_defrag_leaves() does not support extent_root, remove its
corresponding call. The user can use the file based defrag to defrag
extents as of now.
No change in behaviour as extent_root is explicitly skipped in
btrfs_defrag_leaves and this has never worked as expected.
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ ehnance changelong ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
btrfs_add_delayed_data_ref is always called with a NULL extent_op,
so let's drop the argument.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The check for a null inode is redundant since the function
is a callback for exportfs, which will itself crash if
dentry->d_inode or parent->d_inode is NULL. Removing the
null check makes this consistent with other file systems.
Also remove the redundant null dir check too.
Found with static analysis by CoverityScan, CID 1389472
Kudos to Jeff Mahoney for reviewing and explaining the error in
my original patch (most of this explanation went into the above
commit message) and David Sterba for pointing out that the dir
check is also redundant.
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This replaces ACCESS_ONCE macro with the corresponding
READ|WRITE macros
Signed-off-by: Seraphime Kirkovski <kirkseraph@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This cleans up the cases where the min/max macros were used with a cast
rather than using directly min_t/max_t.
Signed-off-by: Seraphime Kirkovski <kirkseraph@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
To make the code clearer, use rb_entry() instead of container_of() to
deal with rbtree.
Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliangtang@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
try_release_extent_state reduces the gfp mask to GFP_NOFS if it is
compatible. This is true for GFP_KERNEL as well. There is no real
reason to do that though. There is no new lock taken down the
the only consumer of the gfp mask which is
try_release_extent_state
clear_extent_bit
__clear_extent_bit
alloc_extent_state
So this seems just unnecessary and confusing.
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
b335b0034e ("Btrfs: Avoid using __GFP_HIGHMEM with slab allocator")
has reduced the allocation mask in btrfs_releasepage to GFP_NOFS just
to prevent from giving an unappropriate gfp mask to the slab allocator
deeper down the callchain (in alloc_extent_state). This is wrong for
two reasons a) GFP_NOFS might be just too restrictive for the calling
context b) it is better to tweak the gfp mask down when it needs that.
So just remove the mask tweaking from btrfs_releasepage and move it
down to alloc_extent_state where it is needed.
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Goldwyn Rodrigues has exposed and fixed a bug which underflows btrfs
qgroup reserved space, and leads to non-writable fs.
This reminds us that we don't have enough underflow check for qgroup
reserved space.
For underflow case, we should not really underflow the numbers but warn
and keeps qgroup still work.
So add more check on qgroup reserved space and add WARN_ON() and
btrfs_warn() for any underflow case.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Nikolay Borisov