This reverts commit e17caa63a6.
Reason for revert: rewrite this in ag/11250335 without neverallow
Bug: 152655956
Change-Id: I24436720056ac1b9878e37c2ee45c5806714f3e9
apex_deps/apex/apex_flattened mutators don't have to run if module is
disabled.
For some branches which have no valid targets, apex modules are disabled
by the os mutator. e.g. aosp-build-tools
Some enforcement checks which run during those mutators may fail because
build-environment doesn't provide full context information.
For example, "Platform_version_all_codenames" config variable is not
set while apex.min_sdk_version uses one of those codenames.
Bug: 152655956
Test: m
Merged-In: I47e27d2d025ba4c36534708b113ce77c4cb2397b
Change-Id: I47e27d2d025ba4c36534708b113ce77c4cb2397b
(cherry picked from commit 49f6701e9a)
A module is marked unavailable for platform when 1) it does not have
"//apex_available:platform" in its apex_available property, or 2)
it depends on another module that is unavailable for platform.
In that case, LOCAL_NOT_AVAILABLE_FOR_PLATFORM is set to true for the
module in the Make world. Later, that flag is used to ensure that there
is no module with the flag is installed to the device.
The reason why this isn't entirely done in Soong is because Soong
doesn't know if a module will be installed to the device or not. To
explain this, let's have an example.
cc_test { name: "mytest", static_libs: ["libfoo"]}
cc_library_static { name: "libfoo", static_libs: ["libbar"]}
cc_library { name: "libbar", apex_available: ["com.android.xxx"]}
Here, libbar is not available for platform, but is used by libfoo which
is available for platform (apex_available defaults to
"//apex_available:platform"). libfoo is again depended on by mytest
which again is available for platform. The use of libbar should be
allowed in the context of test; we don't want to make libbar available
to platform just for the dependency from test because it will allow
non-test uses of the library as well.
Soong by itself can't tell whether libfoo and libbar are used only in the
context of a test. There could be another module depending them, e.g.,
cc_library_shared { name: "mylib", static_libs: ["libfoo"] }
can exist and it might be installed to the device, in which case
we really should trigger an error.
Since Make has the knowledge of what's installed and what's not,
the check should be done there.
Bug: 153073816
Test: m
Test: remove "//apex_available:platform" from libmdnssd (it is currently
installed to /system/lib), and check that `m system_image` fails
Change-Id: Ia304cc5f41f173229e8a154e90cea4dce46dcebe
For a given variant of a module that implements ApexModule interface,
the "updatable" property tests if this variant comes from an updatable
apex. For platform variants it is always false.
Test: lunch aosp_walleye-userdebug && m nothing
Bug: 138994281
Change-Id: I2d4c54fb397e29dc9b3203be7fb17be4536529f7
The marked library(ies) were available to the APEXes via the
hand-written whitelist in build/soong/apex/apex.go. Trying to remove the
whitelist by adding apex_available property to the Android.bp of the
libraries.
Bug: 150999716
Test: m
Merged-In: I11a4e877ee27f7c55e2f00371c6fa58daedb1a9f
Change-Id: I11a4e877ee27f7c55e2f00371c6fa58daedb1a9f
It is no longer needed because non-static java_library dependencies are
not considered to be part of the depending APEX.
Bug: 153443117
Bug: 153306490
Test: m nothing
Merged-In: I7d58d1047b2d400395a253e492b35008284778ff
Change-Id: I7d58d1047b2d400395a253e492b35008284778ff
When a source and a prebuilt module are present in the same build a
dependency is added from the source module to the prebuilt module.
Previously, the code for generating the APEX did not recognize that
tag and in some cases (e.g. for cc_(prebuilt_)library_shared) will
fail the build.
This change:
1) Adds a test to reproduce the problem.
2) Improves the debug message by pretty printing the tag.
3) Adds a new ExcludeFromApexContents interface that can be implemented
by a tag to declare that it should be excluded from the APEX
contents.
4) Ignores tags that implement that interface when generating APEX
contents.
5) Implements that interface on prebuiltDependencyTag to fix the
test.
Bug: 153326844
Bug: 153306490
Test: m nothing
Merged-In: I9dd4312c4f995c816c0a31d8d733eb5d7f56e1ea
Change-Id: I9dd4312c4f995c816c0a31d8d733eb5d7f56e1ea
Previously, adding java_library to an sdk required that the names of
any APEXes that transitively compiled against it were added to its
apex_available property. This change removes that requirement.
Also corrects the dependency path in the TestApexAvailable_IndirectDep
error which previously passed through "shared from static" static
dependency tags even though those are explicitly NOT followed when
checking apex_available settings.
Bug: 152878661
Bug: 153306490
Test: m droid
Merged-In: I995ed38956c1bc210b09494812de012fed9f9232
Change-Id: I995ed38956c1bc210b09494812de012fed9f9232
Having dependency tags in the dependency path that shows why a specific
module is considered part of an apex makes it easier to understand why
that is the case and detect possible issues.
Bug: 152762638
Bug: 153306490
Test: m nothing
Merged-In: Iba2a8a5a6abe03dadee456e760aa4373cd00c07b
Change-Id: Iba2a8a5a6abe03dadee456e760aa4373cd00c07b
The DepIsInSameApex() and RequiredSdks() methods were defined in a few
places to avoid having to depend on the whole ApexModule/SdkAware
interfaces directly. However, that has a couple of issues:
1) It duplicates functionality making it difficult to change, changes
to the definitions outside the main interfaces do not cause compile
time failures, instead they result in a runtime change in behavior
which can be difficult to debug.
2) IDE navigation (specifically in Intellij) does not detect that the
duplicate definitions can resolve to the definitions in the main
interface.
This change extracts the methods into their own interfaces and reuses
those interfaces instead of duplicating the methods to fix both of
these issues.
Bug: 152878661
Bug: 153306490
Test: m nothing
Merged-In: I0cfdf342a14eb0bfb82b1bd17e0633d81c7facfb
Change-Id: I0cfdf342a14eb0bfb82b1bd17e0633d81c7facfb
Delegate the responsibility for determining whether the
walkPayloadDeps() should visit a child dependency to its do function.
This is needed to allow the visitor in checkApexAvailability() to avoid
checking the apex_available setting after crossing the APEX boundary.
Bug: 152878661
Bug: 153306490
Test: m droid
Merged-In: If46a2f74b6eca670befc3aeae430650e85542346
Change-Id: If46a2f74b6eca670befc3aeae430650e85542346
The apex available check can traverse quite a long path (5+ steps) to
get from the apex to a module that is missing the apex from its
apex_available property. Understanding where that dependency came from
can often require examining the dependency path which can be difficult.
This change adds the path to the error to simplify that process.
Bug: 153306490
Test: m nothing
Bug: 152762638
Merged-In: Ic4eb169dc2026cd8339d49e23b25d6d1c3879750
Change-Id: Ic4eb169dc2026cd8339d49e23b25d6d1c3879750
Makes sure that the module snapshots do not rely on the white list
of apex available settings so that when those lists are removed it is
not necessary to update any snapshots.
Bug: 142935992
Bug: 153306490
Test: m nothing
Merged-In: Iedcff7dfc2646a4da77258d16e06657dd2f411f9
Change-Id: Iedcff7dfc2646a4da77258d16e06657dd2f411f9
Test apexes no longer check to see whether their contents are available
so the special handling is no longer necessary.
Bug: 142935992
Bug: 153306490
Test: m nothing
Merged-In: Iecae7dcbb87908d19c672f74d3c1ed8810d4485b
Change-Id: Iecae7dcbb87908d19c672f74d3c1ed8810d4485b
The whitelistedApexAvailable used to map references to
com.android.art.debug/release to com.android.art before looking it up
in the white list. This change removed that mapping and simply added
both to the white list.
Bug: 142935992
Bug: 153306490
Test: m nothing
Merged-In: Ibad76fb73988688eb303e056197986ee9a6119ae
Change-Id: Ibad76fb73988688eb303e056197986ee9a6119ae
Coverage build adds extra dependencies for the runtime libs. Marking
them and their transitive dependenciese with apex_available doesn't make
any value; it instead adds noise.
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cherry-pick from AOSP
Bug: 150999716
Test: m
Merged-In: I08e51cec1de6ded624ef9d4c41c1e5b2e611ff38
(cherry picked from commit 58d1090032)
Change-Id: I08e51cec1de6ded624ef9d4c41c1e5b2e611ff38
The marked library(ies) were available to the adbd APEX via the
hand-written whitelist in build/soong/apex/apex.go. Trying to remove the
whitelist by adding apex_available property to the Android.bp of the
libraries.
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cherry-pick from AOSP
Bug: 150999716
Test: m
Merged-In: I6afbe905dda11056559521b937803dcd85b32fe5
(cherry picked from commit 3a0db5ef4e)
Change-Id: I6afbe905dda11056559521b937803dcd85b32fe5
The NDK prebuilts are implicitly used when building with sdk_version set.
Make the module types be available to any apex so that we don't need to
manually add apex_available property to the module definitions manually.
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cherry-pick from AOSP
Bug: 150999716
Test: m
Merged-In: I0870afa4c74b4a06ab1273dff84615778561ecc9
(cherry picked from commit e01e228270)
Change-Id: I0870afa4c74b4a06ab1273dff84615778561ecc9
The marked library(ies) were available to the APEXes via the hand-written
whitelist in build/soong/apex/apex.go. Trying to remove the whitelist
by adding apex_available property to the Android.bp of the libraries.
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cherry-pick from AOSP
Bug: 150999716
Test: m
Merged-In: I91d1b1076733a949ca2a959ba640ce34d0233492
(cherry picked from commit 541142ce6b)
Change-Id: I91d1b1076733a949ca2a959ba640ce34d0233492
apex_deps/apex/apex_flattened mutators don't have to run if module is
disabled.
For some branches which have no valid targets, apex modules are disabled
by the os mutator. e.g. aosp-build-tools
Some enforcement checks which run during those mutators may fail because
build-environment doesn't provide full context information.
For example, "Platform_version_all_codenames" config variable is not
set while apex.min_sdk_version uses one of those codenames.
Bug: 152655956
Test: m
Change-Id: I47e27d2d025ba4c36534708b113ce77c4cb2397b
Apex can use codenames like "Q", "R" for its min_sdk_version property.
Also, cc_library can use codenames for its stubs.versions.
Bug: 152655956
Test: m
Merged-In: I077ad7b2ac5d90b4c8708921e43846206f05ba70
Change-Id: I077ad7b2ac5d90b4c8708921e43846206f05ba70
(cherry picked from commit 29e91d2121)
It is no longer needed because non-static java_library dependencies are
not considered to be part of the depending APEX.
Bug: 153443117
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: I7d58d1047b2d400395a253e492b35008284778ff
When a source and a prebuilt module are present in the same build a
dependency is added from the source module to the prebuilt module.
Previously, the code for generating the APEX did not recognize that
tag and in some cases (e.g. for cc_(prebuilt_)library_shared) will
fail the build.
This change:
1) Adds a test to reproduce the problem.
2) Improves the debug message by pretty printing the tag.
3) Adds a new ExcludeFromApexContents interface that can be implemented
by a tag to declare that it should be excluded from the APEX
contents.
4) Ignores tags that implement that interface when generating APEX
contents.
5) Implements that interface on prebuiltDependencyTag to fix the
test.
Bug: 153326844
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: I9dd4312c4f995c816c0a31d8d733eb5d7f56e1ea
Previously, adding java_library to an sdk required that the names of
any APEXes that transitively compiled against it were added to its
apex_available property. This change removes that requirement.
Also corrects the dependency path in the TestApexAvailable_IndirectDep
error which previously passed through "shared from static" static
dependency tags even though those are explicitly NOT followed when
checking apex_available settings.
Bug: 152878661
Test: m droid
Change-Id: I995ed38956c1bc210b09494812de012fed9f9232
Having dependency tags in the dependency path that shows why a specific
module is considered part of an apex makes it easier to understand why
that is the case and detect possible issues.
Bug: 152762638
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: Iba2a8a5a6abe03dadee456e760aa4373cd00c07b
The DepIsInSameApex() and RequiredSdks() methods were defined in a few
places to avoid having to depend on the whole ApexModule/SdkAware
interfaces directly. However, that has a couple of issues:
1) It duplicates functionality making it difficult to change, changes
to the definitions outside the main interfaces do not cause compile
time failures, instead they result in a runtime change in behavior
which can be difficult to debug.
2) IDE navigation (specifically in Intellij) does not detect that the
duplicate definitions can resolve to the definitions in the main
interface.
This change extracts the methods into their own interfaces and reuses
those interfaces instead of duplicating the methods to fix both of
these issues.
Bug: 152878661
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: I0cfdf342a14eb0bfb82b1bd17e0633d81c7facfb
Apex can use codenames like "Q", "R" for its min_sdk_version property.
Also, cc_library can use codenames for its stubs.versions.
Bug: 152655956
Test: vendor/google/build/build_mainline_modules.sh
Change-Id: I077ad7b2ac5d90b4c8708921e43846206f05ba70
Delegate the responsibility for determining whether the
walkPayloadDeps() should visit a child dependency to its do function.
This is needed to allow the visitor in checkApexAvailability() to avoid
checking the apex_available setting after crossing the APEX boundary.
Bug: 152878661
Test: m droid
Change-Id: If46a2f74b6eca670befc3aeae430650e85542346
The apex available check can traverse quite a long path (5+ steps) to
get from the apex to a module that is missing the apex from its
apex_available property. Understanding where that dependency came from
can often require examining the dependency path which can be difficult.
This change adds the path to the error to simplify that process.
Test: m nothing
Bug: 152762638
Change-Id: Ic4eb169dc2026cd8339d49e23b25d6d1c3879750
Coverage build adds extra dependencies for the runtime libs. Marking
them and their transitive dependenciese with apex_available doesn't make
any value; it instead adds noise.
Bug: 150999716
Test: m
Change-Id: I08e51cec1de6ded624ef9d4c41c1e5b2e611ff38
The marked library(ies) were available to the adbd APEX via the
hand-written whitelist in build/soong/apex/apex.go. Trying to remove the
whitelist by adding apex_available property to the Android.bp of the
libraries.
Bug: 150999716
Test: m
Change-Id: I6afbe905dda11056559521b937803dcd85b32fe5
The marked library(ies) were available to the APEXes via the hand-written
whitelist in build/soong/apex/apex.go. Trying to remove the whitelist
by adding apex_available property to the Android.bp of the libraries.
Bug: 150999716
Test: m
Change-Id: I91d1b1076733a949ca2a959ba640ce34d0233492
The NDK prebuilts are implicitly used when building with sdk_version set.
Make the module types be available to any apex so that we don't need to
manually add apex_available property to the module definitions manually.
Bug: 150999716
Test: m
Change-Id: I0870afa4c74b4a06ab1273dff84615778561ecc9
Revert submission 1254009-vdex-symlinks
Reason for revert: This causing some devices to fail to boot. See b/151836042 for details.
Reverted Changes:
Iced89071b:Expect vdex files in a target-independent director...
Ifbceb8457:Share vdex files in the ART apex between architect...
Change-Id: I5bd88f8e61d442eed921d840c90777a2750ddb16
Test: aosp_walleye-userdebug boots.
Test: Check symlinks to *.vdex files in the ART apex:
$ adb shell 'find /apex/com.android.art -name '*.vdex' | xargs ls -l'
lrw-r--r-- 1 system system 23 1970-01-01 01:00 /apex/com.android.art/javalib/arm/boot-apache-xml.vdex -> ../boot-apache-xml.vdex
lrw-r--r-- 1 system system 25 1970-01-01 01:00 /apex/com.android.art/javalib/arm/boot-bouncycastle.vdex -> ../boot-bouncycastle.vdex
lrw-r--r-- 1 system system 23 1970-01-01 01:00 /apex/com.android.art/javalib/arm/boot-core-icu4j.vdex -> ../boot-core-icu4j.vdex
lrw-r--r-- 1 system system 24 1970-01-01 01:00 /apex/com.android.art/javalib/arm/boot-core-libart.vdex -> ../boot-core-libart.vdex
lrw-r--r-- 1 system system 19 1970-01-01 01:00 /apex/com.android.art/javalib/arm/boot-okhttp.vdex -> ../boot-okhttp.vdex
lrw-r--r-- 1 system system 12 1970-01-01 01:00 /apex/com.android.art/javalib/arm/boot.vdex -> ../boot.vdex
lrw-r--r-- 1 system system 23 1970-01-01 01:00 /apex/com.android.art/javalib/arm64/boot-apache-xml.vdex -> ../boot-apache-xml.vdex
lrw-r--r-- 1 system system 25 1970-01-01 01:00 /apex/com.android.art/javalib/arm64/boot-bouncycastle.vdex -> ../boot-bouncycastle.vdex
lrw-r--r-- 1 system system 23 1970-01-01 01:00 /apex/com.android.art/javalib/arm64/boot-core-icu4j.vdex -> ../boot-core-icu4j.vdex
lrw-r--r-- 1 system system 24 1970-01-01 01:00 /apex/com.android.art/javalib/arm64/boot-core-libart.vdex -> ../boot-core-libart.vdex
lrw-r--r-- 1 system system 19 1970-01-01 01:00 /apex/com.android.art/javalib/arm64/boot-okhttp.vdex -> ../boot-okhttp.vdex
lrw-r--r-- 1 system system 12 1970-01-01 01:00 /apex/com.android.art/javalib/arm64/boot.vdex -> ../boot.vdex
-rw-r--r-- 1 system system 1229 1970-01-01 01:00 /apex/com.android.art/javalib/boot-apache-xml.vdex
-rw-r--r-- 1 system system 2043 1970-01-01 01:00 /apex/com.android.art/javalib/boot-bouncycastle.vdex
-rw-r--r-- 1 system system 2883 1970-01-01 01:00 /apex/com.android.art/javalib/boot-core-icu4j.vdex
-rw-r--r-- 1 system system 865 1970-01-01 01:00 /apex/com.android.art/javalib/boot-core-libart.vdex
-rw-r--r-- 1 system system 395 1970-01-01 01:00 /apex/com.android.art/javalib/boot-okhttp.vdex
-rw-r--r-- 1 system system 7125 1970-01-01 01:00 /apex/com.android.art/javalib/boot.vdex
Bug: 150934453
Change-Id: Ifbceb845749f4c218693f4118e8b35b59ff26de1
libselinux no longer is included in any APEX. Only the platform variant
of it (/system/lib/libselinux.so) exists and APEXes link to it.
Removing the lib name from the whitelist to make it clear that the
library is not available to any APEX.
Bug: 151053366
Bug: 150999716
Test: m
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cherry-pick from aosp
Merged-In: Id4fb933141ad32ff5217a58f1c7d689cc657e9ea
(cherry picked from commit 1731f6ae3f)
Change-Id: Id4fb933141ad32ff5217a58f1c7d689cc657e9ea
min_sdk_version = 29 implies that the module should support Android10.
Bug: 150431944
Test: m
Merged-In: Iad90a239898f59456900ae7816b90379b1b43406
Change-Id: Iad90a239898f59456900ae7816b90379b1b43406
(cherry picked from commit 5417f775e5)
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cp from aosp
Native modules within APEX should be linked with proper stub version
according to its min_sdk_version.
For example, when min_sdk_version is set to "29", libfoo in the apex
would be linked to libbar of version 29 from platform, even if it has
a newer version like 30.
Bug: 145796956
Test: m nothing (soong tests)
Merged-In: I4a0b2002587bc24b7deeb5d59b6eeba5e1db5b1f
Change-Id: I4a0b2002587bc24b7deeb5d59b6eeba5e1db5b1f
(cherry picked from commit 03b5185b88)
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: got ORV already.
libselinux no longer is included in any APEX. Only the platform variant
of it (/system/lib/libselinux.so) exists and APEXes link to it.
Removing the lib name from the whitelist to make it clear that the
library is not available to any APEX.
Bug: 151053366
Bug: 150999716
Test: m
Change-Id: Id4fb933141ad32ff5217a58f1c7d689cc657e9ea
Makes sure that the module snapshots do not rely on the white list
of apex available settings so that when those lists are removed it is
not necessary to update any snapshots.
Bug: 142935992
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: Iedcff7dfc2646a4da77258d16e06657dd2f411f9
Test apexes no longer check to see whether their contents are available
so the special handling is no longer necessary.
Bug: 142935992
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: Iecae7dcbb87908d19c672f74d3c1ed8810d4485b
The whitelistedApexAvailable used to map references to
com.android.art.debug/release to com.android.art before looking it up
in the white list. This change removed that mapping and simply added
both to the white list.
Bug: 142935992
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: Ibad76fb73988688eb303e056197986ee9a6119ae
Merged-In: Ibad76fb73988688eb303e056197986ee9a6119ae
NativeBridgeRelativePath should be appended after /bin or /lib and
before subdir.
Bug: N/A
Test: m (add a soong test)
Change-Id: Id0c44c66b4900caa291e816cf3361fdec8ff9421
Checking apex_available was missing some corner cases.
For example, the deps of share deps of cc_library modules are missed
while those from cc_library_shared are correctly tracked.
This was due to..
* calling DepIsInSameApex in WalkDeps: both work fine separately, but
when they are used together, it fails to work. It's due to how WalkDeps
works. (We might fix this bug too risky since it is used very widely)
* incorrect receiver for DepIsInSameApex in apex_deps mutator: receiver
is supposed to be parent, but child was used before. Interestingly lots
of deps are within the same group of module types(cc to cc, java to
java), it has worked. (note that receiver's DepIsInSameApex
implementation can be different).
This change fixes them by..
* walkPayloadDeps is now relying on ApexVariation, which is calculated
correctly by TopDown apex_deps mutator.
* use correct receiver for DepIsInSameApex in apex_deps mutator, which
requires for java.SdkLibrary to override the method and for
java.Library/Import to use passed dep instead of receiver to check its
membership of sdk.
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cherry-pick from aosp/master
Bug: 151071238
Test: build/boot
Merged-In: I0569ef4bb8e79635e4d97a89f421a8d8b7d26456
(cherry picked from commit 5e9013be22)
Change-Id: I0569ef4bb8e79635e4d97a89f421a8d8b7d26456
Checking apex_available was missing some corner cases.
For example, the deps of share deps of cc_library modules are missed
while those from cc_library_shared are correctly tracked.
This was due to..
* calling DepIsInSameApex in WalkDeps: both work fine separately, but
when they are used together, it fails to work. It's due to how WalkDeps
works. (We might fix this bug too risky since it is used very widely)
* incorrect receiver for DepIsInSameApex in apex_deps mutator: receiver
is supposed to be parent, but child was used before. Interestingly lots
of deps are within the same group of module types(cc to cc, java to
java), it has worked. (note that receiver's DepIsInSameApex
implementation can be different).
This change fixes them by..
* walkPayloadDeps is now relying on ApexVariation, which is calculated
correctly by TopDown apex_deps mutator.
* use correct receiver for DepIsInSameApex in apex_deps mutator, which
requires for java.SdkLibrary to override the method and for
java.Library/Import to use passed dep instead of receiver to check its
membership of sdk.
Bug: 151071238
Test: build/boot
Change-Id: I0569ef4bb8e79635e4d97a89f421a8d8b7d26456
When the check for apex_available has failed, the build system now shows
the module that brought the unavailable module into the APEX.
Bug: 151051671
Test: m
Merged-In: Id1a3fda67fe56fdc2dc90ec800d10689415de4d6
(cherry picked from commit 7bd9444b0f)
Change-Id: Id1a3fda67fe56fdc2dc90ec800d10689415de4d6
When the check for apex_available has failed, the build system now shows
the module that brought the unavailable module into the APEX.
Bug: 151051671
Test: m
Change-Id: Id1a3fda67fe56fdc2dc90ec800d10689415de4d6
Native modules within APEX should be linked with proper stub version
according to its min_sdk_version.
For example, when min_sdk_version is set to "29", libfoo in the apex
would be linked to libbar of version 29 from platform, even if it has
a newer version like 30.
Bug: 145796956
Test: m nothing (soong tests)
Change-Id: I4a0b2002587bc24b7deeb5d59b6eeba5e1db5b1f
Add a min_sdk_version property apexes. Currently a noop, but will
be used to enforce that dependencies are compatible with the
specified version.
Test: m checkbuild
Bug: 149591522
Merged-In: I923773c90fe15becbffae3986791aa9edde8f8f6
Change-Id: I923773c90fe15becbffae3986791aa9edde8f8f6
(cherry picked from commit 50317874ff)
If an APEX contains APKs and the manifest package name of the APKs are
overridden (either via override_android_app
orPRODUCT_MANIFEST_PACKAGE_NAME_OVERRIDES), that the path to the APK
(relative in the APEX) and the overridden manifest package name is
recorded in the bundle config file.
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cherry-pick from master
Bug: 148002117
Test: m
Merged-In: Ibb90bcefb77fa6b2dad77cb2facc6079de9ab154
(cherry picked from commit cfaa1643e8)
Change-Id: Ibb90bcefb77fa6b2dad77cb2facc6079de9ab154
If an APEX contains APKs and the manifest package name of the APKs are
overridden (either via override_android_app
orPRODUCT_MANIFEST_PACKAGE_NAME_OVERRIDES), that the path to the APK
(relative in the APEX) and the overridden manifest package name is
recorded in the bundle config file.
Bug: 148002117
Test: m
Change-Id: Ibb90bcefb77fa6b2dad77cb2facc6079de9ab154
Which is the list of JNI libraries that are embeded inside the apex.
jni_libs is handled just like native_shared_libs except that it is
stored in apex_manifest.
When linkerconfig finds an apex with JNI libs, it exposes the namespace
for the apex as visible so that libnativeloader can link the namespace
to the corresponding classloader-namespace.
Bug: 149363889
Test: m nothing(runs soong test)
Change-Id: I52ebe38b44545e6e8853e34a3404a235c858112a
Embed common properties (apexNativeDependencies) so that the logic for
adding dependencies for native modules can be reused.
Bug: N/A
Test: m
Change-Id: I789b526c09eea14213ab1544590ed2238ed8c625
Symlinking doesn't make sense for host APEXes.
Bug: 150255435
Test: m com.android.art.host and inspect the built APEX; there is
no symlink.
Merged-In: I28492dfaaef471117a430be05255fbef76e557b0
(cherry picked from commit 9b96418dfe)
Change-Id: I28492dfaaef471117a430be05255fbef76e557b0
Symlinking doesn't make sense for host APEXes.
Bug: 150255435
Test: m com.android.art.host and inspect the built APEX; there is
no symlink.
Change-Id: I28492dfaaef471117a430be05255fbef76e557b0
Because APK-in-APEX embeds its jni_libs in it. We don't have to follow
deps of jni_libs.
Bug: 146992436
Test: m com.android.tethering
deapexer extract com.android.tethering.apex apex
ls apex # there should be no /lib dir
Merged-In: Ifa1a6430a420ae7376b155cd59b8ece462cced7e
Change-Id: Ifa1a6430a420ae7376b155cd59b8ece462cced7e
(cherry picked from commit b7bebe2616)
Because APK-in-APEX embeds its jni_libs in it. We don't have to follow
deps of jni_libs.
Bug: 146992436
Test: m com.android.tethering
deapexer extract com.android.tethering.apex apex
ls apex # there should be no /lib dir
Change-Id: Ifa1a6430a420ae7376b155cd59b8ece462cced7e
Add a min_sdk_version property apexes. Currently a noop, but will
be used to enforce that dependencies are compatible with the
specified version.
Test: m checkbuild
Bug: 149591522
Change-Id: I923773c90fe15becbffae3986791aa9edde8f8f6
The optimization is confusing syshealth because the modules will use
more memory when they are switched to the prebuilt (unbundled) or
updated via Play.
Let's have a per-module switch to control the behavior and turn it on
only for non-updatable modules like ART.
Bug: 149805758
Test: m
Change-Id: Ieb842c47f31f3b06e403b1e1f9e463c3e5524107
This change fixes a regression that was introduced with
I597bccbb177b6b6320c3a3edeff467243230d384. With the change, the content
of the permissions XML file for a java_sdk_library was determined before
the java_sdk_library is mutated for an APEX. As a result, the file path
to the implementation jar library was always set to
/system/framework/*.jar regardless of whether the java_sdk_library is
part of an APEX or not.
This change fixes the problem, by creating the permissions XML file via
a new module type. The content of the xml file is determined after the
xml file is mutated for APEXes.
Bug: 149600642
Test: m
Change-Id: Id21f8d8285df49b0b3be1daf0f101f2bc978eeb0
Bug: 149075752
Test: tapas com.android.conscrypt com.android.tethering arm64
Test: m out/target/product/generic_arm64/{,symbols/}apex/com.android.{tethering,conscrypt}/lib64/libc++.so
Test: Verified that unwinder was dynamically linked to tethering's
Test: libc++ and statically linked to conscrypt's.
Test: lunch flame-userdebug && m
Test: Verified that unwinder was dynamically linked to /system/lib64/libc++.so
Change-Id: I98eed7cb4316962b19b5c12e150c224c25d0e91d
apex { name: ["myapex"], native_shared_libs: ["libX", "libY"] }
cc_library { name: "libX", shared_libs: ["libY"] }
cc_library { name: "libY", shared_libs: ["libZ"], stubs: {...} }
apexDepsMutator was a bottom up mutator and it uses WalkDeps to traverse
the dependency tree rooted at myapex in a depth-first order. While
traversing the tree, if calls BuildForApex for a module that will be
part of the APEX.
libY is visited twice. Once via libX and once via myapex. If the visit
from libX was before the visit from myapex (since this is a depth-first
traversing), BuildForApex is not called for libY and its dependency
libZ, because libY provides a stub. And then when libY is again visited
via myapex, BuildForApex is correctly called for the module, but not for
its dependencies libZ because the paths from libY to libZ was already
visited.
As a result, the apex variant of libY has a dependency to the non-apex
variant of libZ.
Fixing the problem by changing the mutator a top-down one.
Bug: 148645937
Test: m
Change-Id: Ib2cb28852087c63a568b3fd036504e9261cf0782
The apex dependency map wasn't updated for test or non-installable
APEXes to work around the problem that a module being in such APEX
prevented the module from being installed in the system partition.
Since that problem is not happening any more, removing the unnecessary
work-around.
Bug: 123892969
Test: m
Change-Id: I43e07a9611a3e08ff39b9a64454b1c67949d35bc
This library is empty, and its functionality has moved
into libbinder/libhwbinder.
Bug: 148692216
Test: N/A
Change-Id: I5874efda9ab43fc00cf90395a1aabde45cf49579
The APEX dependency is more correctly tracked. Previously, the
dependency was tracked while we gather modules that will be installed to
an APEX. This actually was incorrect because we skipped many dependency
types that we don't need to follow to gather the modules list, such as
the headers dependency.
Now, the dependency is tracked directly when a module is mutated for an
APEX. In other words, if a module is mutated for an apex X, then the
module will appear in the X-deps-into.txt file.
This change also changes the format of the txt file. It now clearly
shows why a module is included in the APEX by showing the list of
modules that depend on the module.
Bug: 146323213
Test: m
Change-Id: I0a70cf9cce56e36565f9d55683fdaace8748a081
The function visits dependencies of an APEX that contribute to the
payload. checkApexAvailability is rewritten using the generic function.
There is no change in behavior.
Bug: N/A
Test: m
Change-Id: I1a8b4eb0a60a432f667a61b4f6f457c3b8f1cd3d
Previously, a java_sdk_library called "SDKLIB" would create a
prebuilt_etc module called "SDKLIB.xml" which installs the generated
XML permission file to /etc/permissions/SDKLIB.xml. That module
depended on the java_sdk_library "SDKLIB" to generate the XML file
as one of its outputs by specifying srcs: [":SDKLIB{.xml}"].
If the java_sdk_library is replaced by a prebuilt then the SDKLIB.xml
module expects the prebuilt to provide the XML permissions file which
it doesn't because that is an implementation detail and so the build
breaks.
A couple of alternative approaches were looked at to fix this. One was
to have the logic that replaced the source module with the prebuilt to
inform the source module that it was being replaced so it could disable
its created module. That lead to a dependency cycle where
SDKLIB -> SDKLIB.xml -> SDKLIB{.xml}
Another solution was to mark dependency tags in such a way that the
prebuilt could automatically identify and disable the SDKLIB.xml
module. Similar to how the visibility code will ignore dependencies
that are tagged with ExcludeFromVisibilityEnforcementTag. That became
very convoluted.
Instead the java_sdk_library was changed so that it was not responsible
for creating the XML permissions file. Instead it created a genrule
called "gen-SDKLIB.xml" to create it and then "SDKLIB.xml" depended on
that. The java_sdk_library also depended on the genrule to make the XML
permissions file available for APEX and testing.
Some refactoring of the APEX code and tests was necessary because they
had knowledge of the internal implementation of java_sdk_library. The
refactoring insulates them a little better from those details.
Bug: 148080325
Test: m droid && TARGET_BUILD_APPS=Camera2 m
Change-Id: I597bccbb177b6b6320c3a3edeff467243230d384
Currently, com.android.runtime provides libc/libm/libdl to system. But
they are supposed to be used from symlinks under /system/lib not
directly from runtime apex.
This helps linkerconfig to generate ld.config.txt automatically for
apexes.
Bug: 144664390
Test: m com.android.runtime
deapexer info com.android.runtime.apex
Change-Id: I1620e88e489fba88a06cc3bd6eb5b86a9b581e4f
This change fixes a bug that apex_available is not enforced for static
dependencies. For example, a module with 'apex_available:
["//apex_available:platform"]' was able to be statically linked to any
APEX. This was happening because the check was done on the modules that
are actually installed to an APEX. Static dependencies of the modules
were not counted as they are not installed to the APEX as files.
Fixing this bug by doing the check by traversing the tree in the method
checkApexAvailability.
This change includes a few number of related changes:
1) DepIsInSameApex implementation for cc.Module was changed as well.
Previuosly, it returned false only when the dependency is actually a
stub variant of a lib. Now, it returns false when the dependency has one
or more stub variants. To understand why, we need to recall that when
there is a dependency to a lib having stubs, we actually create two
dependencies: to the non-stub variant and to the stub variant during the
DepsMutator phase. And later in the build action generation phase, we
choose one of them depending on the context. Also recall that an APEX
variant is created only when DepIsInSameApex returns true. Given these,
with the previous implementatin of DepIsInSameApex, we did create apex
variants of the non-stub variant of the dependency, while not creating
the apex variant for the stub variant. This is not right; we needlessly
created the apex variant. The extra apex variant has caused no harm so
far, but since the apex_available check became more correct, it actually
breaks the build. To fix the issue, we stop creating the APEX variant
both for non-stub and stub variants.
2) platform variant is created regardless of the apex_available value.
This is required for the case when a library X that provides stub is in
an APEX A and is configured to be available only for A. In that case,
libs in other APEX can't use the stub library since the stub library is
mutated only for apex A. By creating the platform variant for the stub
library, it can be used from outside as the default dependency variation
is set to the platform variant when creating the APEX variations.
3) The ApexAvailableWhitelist is added with the dependencies that were
revealed with this change.
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cherry-pick from internal
Bug: 147671264
Test: m
Merged-In: Iaedc05494085ff4e8af227a6392bdd0c338b8e6e
(cherry picked from commit fa89944c79)
Change-Id: Iaedc05494085ff4e8af227a6392bdd0c338b8e6e
This reverts commit a952495643.
Reason for revert: PermissionController may need to be built outside of APEX
Fixes: 148957736
Change-Id: I80a2cd666ea5028741250dd2cebf2bd7d7b331ad
This change fixes a bug that apex_available is not enforced for static
dependencies. For example, a module with 'apex_available:
["//apex_available:platform"]' was able to be statically linked to any
APEX. This was happening because the check was done on the modules that
are actually installed to an APEX. Static dependencies of the modules
were not counted as they are not installed to the APEX as files.
Fixing this bug by doing the check by traversing the tree in the method
checkApexAvailability.
This change includes a few number of related changes:
1) DepIsInSameApex implementation for cc.Module was changed as well.
Previuosly, it returned false only when the dependency is actually a
stub variant of a lib. Now, it returns false when the dependency has one
or more stub variants. To understand why, we need to recall that when
there is a dependency to a lib having stubs, we actually create two
dependencies: to the non-stub variant and to the stub variant during the
DepsMutator phase. And later in the build action generation phase, we
choose one of them depending on the context. Also recall that an APEX
variant is created only when DepIsInSameApex returns true. Given these,
with the previous implementatin of DepIsInSameApex, we did create apex
variants of the non-stub variant of the dependency, while not creating
the apex variant for the stub variant. This is not right; we needlessly
created the apex variant. The extra apex variant has caused no harm so
far, but since the apex_available check became more correct, it actually
breaks the build. To fix the issue, we stop creating the APEX variant
both for non-stub and stub variants.
2) platform variant is created regardless of the apex_available value.
This is required for the case when a library X that provides stub is in
an APEX A and is configured to be available only for A. In that case,
libs in other APEX can't use the stub library since the stub library is
mutated only for apex A. By creating the platform variant for the stub
library, it can be used from outside as the default dependency variation
is set to the platform variant when creating the APEX variations.
3) The ApexAvailableWhitelist is added with the dependencies that were
revealed with this change.
Bug: 147671264
Test: m
Change-Id: Iaedc05494085ff4e8af227a6392bdd0c338b8e6e
apex module accepts PlatformCompatConfigIntf as prebuilt,
and places it in the etc folder of the apex.
Test: m
Test: flash device with dummy config in mediaprovider APEX -
the config is present
Change-Id: Ifc62cd262f6c6571c1bf6c2943879aa20877ecad
Leaving out LOCAL_CERTIFICATE for flattened apex APKs causes
the apkcerts.txt to have empty keys for those APKs, which
confuses the signing tools. Set LOCAL_CERTIFICATE for them.
Also refactor the Certificate support to avoid introducing
duplicated handling for presigned certificates.
Bug: 147765187
Test: m apkcerts-list
Change-Id: Ife07661761cd5a89c9f009b8ce041db4dff9ec54
This change fixes a bug that license info for non-flattened APEXes are
not captured in /system/etc/NOTICE.xml.gz file. For non-flatted APEXes,
we have been creating NOTICE.html.gz file by concatenating all the
license infos of the modules that contributes to the APEX and embedding
the file into the asset directory of the APEX. Then at runtime, the info
is shown through the "Google Play System Update Licenses" UI. However,
this was problematic because the UI only shows license info for the
Google-signed APEXes, leaving OEM-signed APEXes (a.k.a. optional
modules).
The problem is now fixed by associating a merged license file with each
APEX and exporting them to Make, so that the merged license files are
included in the partition level /system/etc/NOTICE.xml.gz file
regardless of whether the APEX is a Google-signed one or not.
This also fixes a bug that license info entries are created for the
runtime paths /apex/<apex_name>/<path_to_a_file>, which is not necessary
as they are already included in the license info of the containing APEX.
Bug: N/A
Test: Go to Settings->About Phone->Legal information and check
that a) /system/apex/*.apex files are shown and b) /apex/<apex_name>/*
files are not shown
Change-Id: I2c25c803b6a4c39b24bb3f724502699382fab50c
This reverts commit 5df3b11f78.
Reason for revert: re-land with a fix
Fix a broken soong test
Add implicit dependency (libprofile-clang-extra) to make a test pass.
Bug: n/a
Test: m
Change-Id: I0b179199bc032501354f8e24782837453781bd8c
VNDK APEX is supposed to contain "vendor" variants of VNDK libraries.
This is different from normal APEXes which have "apex" variants.
Bug: 146758869
Test: build / flash / boot
Change-Id: I5e035678c337334092616b58d2e0e404788a6639
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: Got ORV, but rebased with resolving merge conflicts.
This reverts commit 31c65d4fe4.
Bug: 144533348
Test: checkout master-art-host and run
ALLOW_MISSING_DEPENDENCIES=true DIST_DIR=out/dist /art/tools/dist_linux_bionic.sh -j80 com.android.art.host
the result is successful
Change-Id: Ica11eec9b64867088b16720a41c6d83905976ec5
This means everything that goes into apexes need to be
explicitly labeled to be available for apex.
Whitelist the current offenders. This list should be
trimmed down.
Bug: 147364041
Test: m
Test: multiproduct_kati -only-soong
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cherry-pick from internal
Change-Id: I837299c6a15d46f8a5ba544b613776b1cc27d7b8
Merged-In: I837299c6a15d46f8a5ba544b613776b1cc27d7b8
(cherry picked from commit 93488cbb10d4882845abb732f8e53714f0982031)
Used in coverage builds.
Test: NATIVE_COVERAGE=true \
EMMA_INSTRUMENT_FRAMEWORK=true \
EMMA_INSTRUMENT=true \
m nothing
Change-Id: I6309d8149fce016eb9689326eeae221914e4c3bb
This means everything that goes into apexes need to be
explicitly labeled to be available for apex.
Whitelist the current offenders. This list should be
trimmed down.
Bug: 147364041
Test: m
Test: multiproduct_kati -only-soong
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: Just added more whitelist entries
Change-Id: I837299c6a15d46f8a5ba544b613776b1cc27d7b8
This reverts commit 7cb4d378e7.
Test: m
Test: ALLOW_MISSING_DEPENDENCIES=true DIST_DIR=out/dist ./art/tools/dist_linux_bionic.sh -j80 com.android.art.host
(in the master-art-host branch)
Change-Id: I9beca73aafdf42f03bfa19cf1634b2641dac417b
This reverts commit 956305c61c.
Reason for revert: broke master-art-host branch
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: reverting a bad change
Change-Id: Id7faed4ee85328c7c65847a3543ea9e67a3d50b3
For each APEX, <apexname>-installed-files.txt is dist'ed to show the
list of files and their sizes that are included in the APEX.
Bug: 147605944
Test: m dist and examine the txt files
Change-Id: I565479523e51280fc88d5fbf8ea3f48ac0ae9fee
This change fixes a bug that jacoco-report-classes-all.jar does not
include info for APK-in-APEX such as the MediaProvider apk in
com.android.mediaprovider APEX.
Firstly, LOCAL_SOONG_JACOCO_REPORT_CLASSES_JAR is correctly set also for
the APKs included in APEXes. Secondly, the Make modules for the embedded
APKs are now built with soong_app_prebuilt.mk to correctly import the
jacoco file into the Make world.
Bug: 147296855
Test: execute the following command in internal master.
$ choosecombo cf_x86_phone userdebug
$ NINJA_ARGS="-t path out/target/product/vsoc_x86/jacoco-report-classes-all.jar out/target/common/obj/ETC/MediaProvider.com.android.mediaprovider_intermediates/jacoco-report-classes.jar" EMMA_INSTRUMENT=true EMMA_INSTRUMENT_FRAMEWORK=true m
The result shows that there is a path as follows:
out/target/product/vsoc_x86/jacoco-report-classes-all.jar
out/target/product/vsoc_x86/apex/com.android.mediaprovider/priv-app/MediaProvider/MediaProvider.apk
out/target/product/vsoc_x86/obj/ETC/MediaProvider.com.android.mediaprovider_intermediates/package.apk
out/target/common/obj/ETC/MediaProvider.com.android.mediaprovider_intermediates/jacoco-report-classes.jar
Change-Id: I52d11534a34eb35219bfafca4453e75a1b701c0e
When prebuilt_apex overrides/replaces other apex, the same symlinks need
to be created as well.
Bug: 143192278
Test: 1. add prebuilt_apex with vndk apex
with overrides set as ["com.android.vndk.current"]
2. m <prebuilt apex>
3. check if vndk symlinks are created
Change-Id: I8ee9c981ea9c7202ccf5143b3f43e6848773cd63
When a module is included in an APEX and the module is not directly
installed to the system partition, the 'required' property of the module
is lost. The APEX containing the module now carries the property from
its dependencies.
Bug: 146549048
Test: m
Change-Id: Ie21cc7b8420c6126c855e66c2363644de4a7ef42
We need to have a way to see the list of modules that directly or
indirectly contribute to an APEX. People find it difficult to determine
whether a module is included in which APEXes because APEX tracks
indirect dependencies as well as direct dependencies. Therefore, just
looking at Android.bp for the APEX itself doesn't give the answer.
This change adds a new make target <apex_name>-deps-info, which
generates out/soong/<apex_name>-deps-info.txt file that shows the
internal and external dependencies of the said APEX.
Here, internal means the dependencies are actually part of the
APEX, while external means the dependencies are still external to the
APEX.
Bug: 146323213
Test: m (apex_test amended)
Change-Id: I33d1ccf5d1ca335d71cd6ced0f5f66b8c3886d13
Create an APEX variation of a module only when it is either directly
included in an APEX or the dependency to the module demands that the
module should be included. For example, a non-static dependency to a
java library no longer creates an APEX variant of the library.
Bug: 146907857
Test: m (apex_test amended)
Test: cat out/soong/build.ninja | grep "Module:" | wc -l
reduced from 47132 to 45881
Change-Id: Icd79fb4b60668d852b9f018343b934b5e42a8eda
Permission XML file for java_sdk_library is generated by
java_sdk_library itself now.
And, build rule is switched to android.WriteFile since "echo -e" is
not supported from build server. (-e is printed to output)
Bug: 145474221
Test: m com.android.cronet and check its permissions xml file
also, m org.chromium.net.cronet.xml (created dynamically)
Change-Id: Iffb119151c49bc4fe6c4386fa267cca193f37dbc
java_import doesn't support dex jar which is necessary to be packaged in
an APEX. Supporting this would require non-trivial work. By the way
java_import is not used and there is a workaround.(defining java_library
and static-linking with it)
We drop the support for `java_import` in APEX.
Bug: 139175488
Test: m (soong tests amended)
Change-Id: I924386571079090c701276d87f665ce7fbb6f074
When a java_sdk_library module is added, both impl jar and permission
xml files are packaged together.
For example, when a java_sdk_library "foo" is listed, following two
entries will be in an APEX package.
/javalibs/foo.jar
/etc/permissions/foo.xml
Bug: 145474221
Test: m com.android.cronet
deapexer list com.android.cronet.apex
Change-Id: If5883c02255e9309f20810b1532d3fbe73bf4e95
In case that an apex module depends on a module with stubs directly
*and* indirectly, the build system should follow the deps graph further.
Note that WalkDeps() visits deps in DFS and it won't visit again visited
modules.
Bug: n/a
Test: m (apex_test.go amended)
Change-Id: I1a6f135dbda6d1eb641575a3fbbc9bbee0622076
This change fixes a bug that LOCAL_PATH for modules included in an APEX
is set to the path of the APEX bundle, not to the path of the embedded
module. For example, LOCAL_PATH of libconscrypt included in
com.android.adbd was set to /system/core/adb instead of
/external/boringssl. This caused a problem that NOTICE file in
/external/boringssl is not tagged to libconscrypt, but the NOTICE file
for adbd is.
Fixing the problem by recording the module directories of the included
modules and emitting it in LOCAL_PATH.
Bug: 145347092
Test: Settings -> About Phone -> Legal Information -> Third-party
license. The license for /apex/com.android.adbd/lib64/libconscrypt.so is
OpenSSL.
Change-Id: I76f1830d5a10af63fa74dcc2a42730ffabb8c4ed
APEXes with "legacy_android10_support" will have apex_manifest.json for
compatibility as well as apex_manifest.pb.
Bug: 143951586
Test: m (soong tests)
Change-Id: I019252aee5a9423f4b180ba1026e6e99c9961437
GSI targets are supposed to have both 'flattened' and 'unflattened'
APEXes. By adding 'flattened' APEX as REQUIRED moduled for 'unflattened'
APEX, both will be installed togetther.
This is done by a new variable PRODUCT_INSTALL_EXTRA_FLATTENED_APEXES,
which is set only for GSI targets.
Bug: 137802149
Test: lunch aosp_arm64-userdebug && m
resulting apex images under /system/apex
and flattened apexes under /system/system_ext/apex
Change-Id: I336e2674e427b358542e0045b2a49dfa3d84095b
Previously, it was defaultable only for cc_library. Now, it is
defaultable for all module types.
Bug: 128708192
Test: m
Change-Id: If248f593da6f4b724bf889ccd7f2e077d48069b5
This change is to make it easier to add new fields to the struct.
transitiveDep field is added to distinguish apexFiles coming from
transitive dependencies of the APEX. We will later use the info to
reduce the size of bundled APEXes by replacing the transitive deps with
symlinks to the corresponding files in the system partition outside of
the APEX.
Bug: 144533348
Test: m
Change-Id: I283859f2f2f1b5cfb3025569f168ba8569b22bb9
This build rule is specific to platform APEXes.
For non-platform APEXes, MakeAsSystemExt() is not applied.
This fixes the cases of "soc_specific: true" apexes which fails to
build.
Bug: 139053989
Test: m nothing (soong tests)
Change-Id: I98d0257499647ab41cdaa62a3671d89addbdf833
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: got +1 before rebasing
When an override_apex named Foo overrides an apex module named Bar, the
Make modules from Foo have Foo as their suffix. Previously the suffix
was Bar for both of the overriding and the overridden APEXes, causing
name conflicts in the Make side.
Bug: 144338929
Test: apex_test.go
Change-Id: I1396910ab294ba5f5e0585af6d37f1eab9460250
Jooyung Han