When the check for apex_available has failed, the build system now shows
the module that brought the unavailable module into the APEX.
Bug: 151051671
Test: m
Merged-In: Id1a3fda67fe56fdc2dc90ec800d10689415de4d6
(cherry picked from commit 7bd9444b0f)
Change-Id: Id1a3fda67fe56fdc2dc90ec800d10689415de4d6
sdk_version is passed for relevant variants.
If not specified or "current",
it maps to "10000" for platform variants, and
"min_sdk_version" of the apex for apex variants.
Bug: 150860940
Test: m (soong test)
manually check build.ninja
Change-Id: I5102ab0c5086b5ad29d16ac45af55d32062167b4
Native modules within APEX should be linked with proper stub version
according to its min_sdk_version.
For example, when min_sdk_version is set to "29", libfoo in the apex
would be linked to libbar of version 29 from platform, even if it has
a newer version like 30.
Bug: 145796956
Test: m nothing (soong tests)
Change-Id: I4a0b2002587bc24b7deeb5d59b6eeba5e1db5b1f
apex { name: "foo" }
override_apex { name: "override_foo", base:"foo" }
PRODUCT_MANIFEST_PACKAGE_NAME_OVERRIDES := foo:com.android.foo
Previously, the override was done only for the overridden package "foo",
but not for "override_foo". Fixing this issue by using ctx.ModuleName()
when finding the package name to use.
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cherry-pick from internal
Bug: 150645663
Test: m
Merged-In: I2947e5c75369216a4bbce8749503236be86771c3
(cherry picked from commit a519c54dd3)
Change-Id: I2947e5c75369216a4bbce8749503236be86771c3
This is rarely used feature but cost alot for the local build and build
inra.
Bug: 150506627
Test: m
Change-Id: Iec3ada4a97c7b228f2818563fa0e81b407f2715a
When there is a runtime depedency (via runtime_libs property) to a
library providing stable C APIs, the dependency is considered as
crossing APEX boundary. Therefore, the requested lib doesn't need to be
made available to the APEX where the requesting lib is in.
Bug: 147813447
Test: m
Change-Id: I9cf8a5877850fb85b92c851e15fac921b8b7641b
If an APEX contains APKs and the manifest package name of the APKs are
overridden (either via override_android_app
orPRODUCT_MANIFEST_PACKAGE_NAME_OVERRIDES), that the path to the APK
(relative in the APEX) and the overridden manifest package name is
recorded in the bundle config file.
Bug: 148002117
Test: m
Change-Id: Ibb90bcefb77fa6b2dad77cb2facc6079de9ab154
bundle config file for apexes are auto-generated. It is included in the
<apex>-base.zip file, which is expected to be extracted and then fed
into the bundletool.
This change is in preparation for the upcoming change to include
information about embedded apks in the bundle confir file.
Bug: 148002117
Test: m
Change-Id: If25d75e0f62036dc777faf8593ed8eb9a74950b0
Which is the list of JNI libraries that are embeded inside the apex.
jni_libs is handled just like native_shared_libs except that it is
stored in apex_manifest.
When linkerconfig finds an apex with JNI libs, it exposes the namespace
for the apex as visible so that libnativeloader can link the namespace
to the corresponding classloader-namespace.
Bug: 149363889
Test: m nothing(runs soong test)
Change-Id: I52ebe38b44545e6e8853e34a3404a235c858112a
Embed common properties (apexNativeDependencies) so that the logic for
adding dependencies for native modules can be reused.
Bug: N/A
Test: m
Change-Id: I789b526c09eea14213ab1544590ed2238ed8c625
ensureExactContent shouldn't return immediately when it finds a match
from expected list of files.
Bug: N/A
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: Ie15c811f9cfcae7ede28dee0fcf203cee24659a0
Symlinking doesn't make sense for host APEXes.
Bug: 150255435
Test: m com.android.art.host and inspect the built APEX; there is
no symlink.
Merged-In: I28492dfaaef471117a430be05255fbef76e557b0
(cherry picked from commit 9b96418dfe)
Change-Id: I28492dfaaef471117a430be05255fbef76e557b0
Using $(call dist-for-goals,droidcore,...) for every apex
installed-files.txt causes every apex to be built for all builds,
causing a signficiant regression in build time. For now only
dist them in checkbuilds, which were going to build all of them
anyways.
Ideally we would like to dist the installed-files.txt only if
the apex was already built, but there is not currently a way to
express that.
Test: treehugger
Bug: 149979076
Change-Id: I21edbc90980f94ad6d497cb86ee80223dd782fe1
Because APK-in-APEX embeds its jni_libs in it. We don't have to follow
deps of jni_libs.
Bug: 146992436
Test: m com.android.tethering
deapexer extract com.android.tethering.apex apex
ls apex # there should be no /lib dir
Change-Id: Ifa1a6430a420ae7376b155cd59b8ece462cced7e
Add a min_sdk_version property apexes. Currently a noop, but will
be used to enforce that dependencies are compatible with the
specified version.
Test: m checkbuild
Bug: 149591522
Change-Id: I923773c90fe15becbffae3986791aa9edde8f8f6
Apps that expect to run on older platforms should use JNI libraries
that will also run on older platforms. Require that apps that set
sdk_version have jni_libs modules that also set sdk_version, or
set jni_uses_platform_apis: true to bypass the check.
Fixes: 149591057
Test: app_test.go
Change-Id: I76b9b45fb5773bc4dfc10520108f4f3578723909
As a second step to removing the go/android3p instructions to copy or
to link NOTICE to LICENSE, include LICENSE files in the notices, which
will allow deleting all of the copied/linked NOTICE files.
The change causes a few additions to the system image notice files.
Test: manually built and compared before and after notices
Change-Id: Ia7bc58e2eba7bed5e63934881b5298201a93bc3e
The optimization is confusing syshealth because the modules will use
more memory when they are switched to the prebuilt (unbundled) or
updated via Play.
Let's have a per-module switch to control the behavior and turn it on
only for non-updatable modules like ART.
Bug: 149805758
Test: m
Change-Id: Ieb842c47f31f3b06e403b1e1f9e463c3e5524107
This change fixes a regression that was introduced with
I597bccbb177b6b6320c3a3edeff467243230d384. With the change, the content
of the permissions XML file for a java_sdk_library was determined before
the java_sdk_library is mutated for an APEX. As a result, the file path
to the implementation jar library was always set to
/system/framework/*.jar regardless of whether the java_sdk_library is
part of an APEX or not.
This change fixes the problem, by creating the permissions XML file via
a new module type. The content of the xml file is determined after the
xml file is mutated for APEXes.
Bug: 149600642
Test: m
Change-Id: Id21f8d8285df49b0b3be1daf0f101f2bc978eeb0
Bug: 149075752
Test: tapas com.android.conscrypt com.android.tethering arm64
Test: m out/target/product/generic_arm64/{,symbols/}apex/com.android.{tethering,conscrypt}/lib64/libc++.so
Test: Verified that unwinder was dynamically linked to tethering's
Test: libc++ and statically linked to conscrypt's.
Test: lunch flame-userdebug && m
Test: Verified that unwinder was dynamically linked to /system/lib64/libc++.so
Change-Id: I98eed7cb4316962b19b5c12e150c224c25d0e91d
apex { name: ["myapex"], native_shared_libs: ["libX", "libY"] }
cc_library { name: "libX", shared_libs: ["libY"] }
cc_library { name: "libY", shared_libs: ["libZ"], stubs: {...} }
apexDepsMutator was a bottom up mutator and it uses WalkDeps to traverse
the dependency tree rooted at myapex in a depth-first order. While
traversing the tree, if calls BuildForApex for a module that will be
part of the APEX.
libY is visited twice. Once via libX and once via myapex. If the visit
from libX was before the visit from myapex (since this is a depth-first
traversing), BuildForApex is not called for libY and its dependency
libZ, because libY provides a stub. And then when libY is again visited
via myapex, BuildForApex is correctly called for the module, but not for
its dependencies libZ because the paths from libY to libZ was already
visited.
As a result, the apex variant of libY has a dependency to the non-apex
variant of libZ.
Fixing the problem by changing the mutator a top-down one.
Bug: 148645937
Test: m
Change-Id: Ib2cb28852087c63a568b3fd036504e9261cf0782
The apex dependency map wasn't updated for test or non-installable
APEXes to work around the problem that a module being in such APEX
prevented the module from being installed in the system partition.
Since that problem is not happening any more, removing the unnecessary
work-around.
Bug: 123892969
Test: m
Change-Id: I43e07a9611a3e08ff39b9a64454b1c67949d35bc
When a module is not available for platform (i.e.
//apex_available:platform is missing in the apex_available property), m
<module_name> previously just didn't work because there is no platform
variant of the module.
This change fixes the behavior; regardless of whether the platform
variant is available or not, m <module_name> builds all the apex
variants of the module along with the platform variant if it exists.
Bug: 147728094
Test: m conscrypt
Change-Id: Iedd3fa6fc0ed779c5f7c5d65f23d86f799ac0cbe
This library is empty, and its functionality has moved
into libbinder/libhwbinder.
Bug: 148692216
Test: N/A
Change-Id: I5874efda9ab43fc00cf90395a1aabde45cf49579
The APEX dependency is more correctly tracked. Previously, the
dependency was tracked while we gather modules that will be installed to
an APEX. This actually was incorrect because we skipped many dependency
types that we don't need to follow to gather the modules list, such as
the headers dependency.
Now, the dependency is tracked directly when a module is mutated for an
APEX. In other words, if a module is mutated for an apex X, then the
module will appear in the X-deps-into.txt file.
This change also changes the format of the txt file. It now clearly
shows why a module is included in the APEX by showing the list of
modules that depend on the module.
Bug: 146323213
Test: m
Change-Id: I0a70cf9cce56e36565f9d55683fdaace8748a081
The function visits dependencies of an APEX that contribute to the
payload. checkApexAvailability is rewritten using the generic function.
There is no change in behavior.
Bug: N/A
Test: m
Change-Id: I1a8b4eb0a60a432f667a61b4f6f457c3b8f1cd3d
With I63f8a1de463011c6e0b97f5f6eee83103e22bc30, a flattened APEX is
installed to /system/apex/<apexBundleName> not /system/apex/<apexName>.
The change was to be in sync with the non-flattened APEXes that are
installed to /system/apex/<apexBundleName>.apex.
apexName is from the 'name' property while apexBundleName is from the
'apex_name' property. The two names are mostly the same, but can be
different, notably for the ART and the VNDK APEXes. e,g apexName =
com.android.art, apexBundleName = com.android.art.release.
However, there was a bug in the fix; we haven't updated the path for the
flattened APEXes in other places: filecontexts and symlinks. As a
result, the files for the APEXes where apexName is different from
apexBundleName were incorrectly labeled and caused a boot loop.
Fixing the bug.
Bug: 140136207
Bug: 149013536
Test: m
Test: OVERRIDE_TARGET_FLATTEN_APEX=true m; then inspect the built
system.img to verify that
/system/apex/com.android.vndk.current/lib/libcrypto.so is correctly
labeled as system_lib_file.
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cherry-pick from internal
Merged-In: I4aaf674a5daeabab5ed6e7025c5389821ee9a013
(cherry picked from commit be95e6b245)
Change-Id: I4aaf674a5daeabab5ed6e7025c5389821ee9a013
Previously, a java_sdk_library called "SDKLIB" would create a
prebuilt_etc module called "SDKLIB.xml" which installs the generated
XML permission file to /etc/permissions/SDKLIB.xml. That module
depended on the java_sdk_library "SDKLIB" to generate the XML file
as one of its outputs by specifying srcs: [":SDKLIB{.xml}"].
If the java_sdk_library is replaced by a prebuilt then the SDKLIB.xml
module expects the prebuilt to provide the XML permissions file which
it doesn't because that is an implementation detail and so the build
breaks.
A couple of alternative approaches were looked at to fix this. One was
to have the logic that replaced the source module with the prebuilt to
inform the source module that it was being replaced so it could disable
its created module. That lead to a dependency cycle where
SDKLIB -> SDKLIB.xml -> SDKLIB{.xml}
Another solution was to mark dependency tags in such a way that the
prebuilt could automatically identify and disable the SDKLIB.xml
module. Similar to how the visibility code will ignore dependencies
that are tagged with ExcludeFromVisibilityEnforcementTag. That became
very convoluted.
Instead the java_sdk_library was changed so that it was not responsible
for creating the XML permissions file. Instead it created a genrule
called "gen-SDKLIB.xml" to create it and then "SDKLIB.xml" depended on
that. The java_sdk_library also depended on the genrule to make the XML
permissions file available for APEX and testing.
Some refactoring of the APEX code and tests was necessary because they
had knowledge of the internal implementation of java_sdk_library. The
refactoring insulates them a little better from those details.
Bug: 148080325
Test: m droid && TARGET_BUILD_APPS=Camera2 m
Change-Id: I597bccbb177b6b6320c3a3edeff467243230d384
Currently, com.android.runtime provides libc/libm/libdl to system. But
they are supposed to be used from symlinks under /system/lib not
directly from runtime apex.
This helps linkerconfig to generate ld.config.txt automatically for
apexes.
Bug: 144664390
Test: m com.android.runtime
deapexer info com.android.runtime.apex
Change-Id: I1620e88e489fba88a06cc3bd6eb5b86a9b581e4f
This change fixes a bug that apex_available is not enforced for static
dependencies. For example, a module with 'apex_available:
["//apex_available:platform"]' was able to be statically linked to any
APEX. This was happening because the check was done on the modules that
are actually installed to an APEX. Static dependencies of the modules
were not counted as they are not installed to the APEX as files.
Fixing this bug by doing the check by traversing the tree in the method
checkApexAvailability.
This change includes a few number of related changes:
1) DepIsInSameApex implementation for cc.Module was changed as well.
Previuosly, it returned false only when the dependency is actually a
stub variant of a lib. Now, it returns false when the dependency has one
or more stub variants. To understand why, we need to recall that when
there is a dependency to a lib having stubs, we actually create two
dependencies: to the non-stub variant and to the stub variant during the
DepsMutator phase. And later in the build action generation phase, we
choose one of them depending on the context. Also recall that an APEX
variant is created only when DepIsInSameApex returns true. Given these,
with the previous implementatin of DepIsInSameApex, we did create apex
variants of the non-stub variant of the dependency, while not creating
the apex variant for the stub variant. This is not right; we needlessly
created the apex variant. The extra apex variant has caused no harm so
far, but since the apex_available check became more correct, it actually
breaks the build. To fix the issue, we stop creating the APEX variant
both for non-stub and stub variants.
2) platform variant is created regardless of the apex_available value.
This is required for the case when a library X that provides stub is in
an APEX A and is configured to be available only for A. In that case,
libs in other APEX can't use the stub library since the stub library is
mutated only for apex A. By creating the platform variant for the stub
library, it can be used from outside as the default dependency variation
is set to the platform variant when creating the APEX variations.
3) The ApexAvailableWhitelist is added with the dependencies that were
revealed with this change.
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cherry-pick from internal
Bug: 147671264
Test: m
Merged-In: Iaedc05494085ff4e8af227a6392bdd0c338b8e6e
(cherry picked from commit fa89944c79)
Change-Id: Iaedc05494085ff4e8af227a6392bdd0c338b8e6e
apex {
name: "myapex",
native_shared_libs: ["libfoo"],
apex_name: "apex_name",
}
override_apex {
name: "myapex.override",
base: "myapex"
}
Previsouly, above wasn't supported because both APEXes have the same
apex_name and that apex_name is used as the suffix of libfoo. i.e.,
there are two libfoo.apex_name modules defined.
Now, the two apex variants of libfoo are named as
libfoo.myapex and libfoo.myapex.override.
Bug: 140136207
Test: m
Change-Id: I63f8a1de463011c6e0b97f5f6eee83103e22bc30
apex module accepts PlatformCompatConfigIntf as prebuilt,
and places it in the etc folder of the apex.
Test: m
Test: flash device with dummy config in mediaprovider APEX -
the config is present
Change-Id: Ifc62cd262f6c6571c1bf6c2943879aa20877ecad
All commands must produce their output files, or they'll trigger
rebuilds the next build.
Test: m com.android.apex.cts.shim.v3; repeat; "ninja: nothing to do"
Change-Id: If30e9d90ce3efc0689cd04ac62cc8207f3a38dd5
Leaving out LOCAL_CERTIFICATE for flattened apex APKs causes
the apkcerts.txt to have empty keys for those APKs, which
confuses the signing tools. Set LOCAL_CERTIFICATE for them.
Also refactor the Certificate support to avoid introducing
duplicated handling for presigned certificates.
Bug: 147765187
Test: m apkcerts-list
Change-Id: Ife07661761cd5a89c9f009b8ce041db4dff9ec54
This change fixes a bug that license info for non-flattened APEXes are
not captured in /system/etc/NOTICE.xml.gz file. For non-flatted APEXes,
we have been creating NOTICE.html.gz file by concatenating all the
license infos of the modules that contributes to the APEX and embedding
the file into the asset directory of the APEX. Then at runtime, the info
is shown through the "Google Play System Update Licenses" UI. However,
this was problematic because the UI only shows license info for the
Google-signed APEXes, leaving OEM-signed APEXes (a.k.a. optional
modules).
The problem is now fixed by associating a merged license file with each
APEX and exporting them to Make, so that the merged license files are
included in the partition level /system/etc/NOTICE.xml.gz file
regardless of whether the APEX is a Google-signed one or not.
This also fixes a bug that license info entries are created for the
runtime paths /apex/<apex_name>/<path_to_a_file>, which is not necessary
as they are already included in the license info of the containing APEX.
Bug: N/A
Test: Go to Settings->About Phone->Legal information and check
that a) /system/apex/*.apex files are shown and b) /apex/<apex_name>/*
files are not shown
Change-Id: I2c25c803b6a4c39b24bb3f724502699382fab50c
This change fixes a bug that symlinks to the system partition are
created in /system/apex/<apex_name> directories even when the APEXes are
non-flattened. The symlinks are needed only for flattened APEX (of
course regardless of whether the APEX is a primary one or not).
Bug: N/A
Test: examine /system/apex directory manually
Change-Id: I00bb1423d0a2497408f05e49767b42437210bab8
This reverts commit 230e241f58.
Reason for revert: This is a revert of a revert. Downstream problem has been fixed and have been validated locally and via Forrest build.
Change-Id: I89c51d25b3adb818ea44a983d0ac681a88790d8c
Symlinks to system libs should be created for flattened apex regardless
that it is primary or not.
For example, GSI installs non-primary flattened apexes as well. These
flattened (non-primary) apexes could be activated on non-updatable
devices.
Bug: 148195518
Test: GSI runs on P
Change-Id: I238b226473d923e03280b1b28dd0d5d1f77ae74a
This reverts commit 5df3b11f78.
Reason for revert: re-land with a fix
Fix a broken soong test
Add implicit dependency (libprofile-clang-extra) to make a test pass.
Bug: n/a
Test: m
Change-Id: I0b179199bc032501354f8e24782837453781bd8c
VNDK APEX is supposed to contain "vendor" variants of VNDK libraries.
This is different from normal APEXes which have "apex" variants.
Bug: 146758869
Test: build / flash / boot
Change-Id: I5e035678c337334092616b58d2e0e404788a6639
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: Got ORV, but rebased with resolving merge conflicts.
This reverts commit 014a85712d.
Reason for revert: Caused vendor/google/build/build_mainline_modules.sh to fail with `Error: minSdkVersion (10000) is greater than maxSdkVersion (30)`.
Bug: 130541924
Change-Id: Ifa233bf40a674481d21b61ee816c5fdde8201080
Use codename.fingerprint format for minSdkVersion if it is unset
in the manifest and
UNBUNDLED_BUILD_TARGET_SDK_WITH_API_FINGERPRINT=true.
Using a utility function in sdk.go to check whether to apply
api.fingerprint.
BUG: 130541924
Change-Id: I748a25c419033bf54b63171d334644fcd0ecc78f
This reverts commit 31c65d4fe4.
Bug: 144533348
Test: checkout master-art-host and run
ALLOW_MISSING_DEPENDENCIES=true DIST_DIR=out/dist /art/tools/dist_linux_bionic.sh -j80 com.android.art.host
the result is successful
Change-Id: Ica11eec9b64867088b16720a41c6d83905976ec5
This means everything that goes into apexes need to be
explicitly labeled to be available for apex.
Whitelist the current offenders. This list should be
trimmed down.
Bug: 147364041
Test: m
Test: multiproduct_kati -only-soong
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cherry-pick from internal
Change-Id: I837299c6a15d46f8a5ba544b613776b1cc27d7b8
Merged-In: I837299c6a15d46f8a5ba544b613776b1cc27d7b8
(cherry picked from commit 93488cbb10d4882845abb732f8e53714f0982031)
For post-Q modules, we can avoid building the hashtree also in the
unbundled build case, since the device will regenerate the hashtree
locally. This CL simplifies the logic so that the build rules apply
regardless of the build being bundled or unbundled -- after all, bundled
build are only really valid for development purposes.
Fix: 147600151
Test: unit test;
m com.android.conscrypt and manual inspection of apexer invocation
(option no_hashtree not present)
m com.android.neuralnetworks and manual inspection of apexer invocation
(option no_hashtree present)
Change-Id: Ib4cc6149d3beac5df7e23a65a3b7ee6b0d68e395
This reverts commit 7cb4d378e7.
Test: m
Test: ALLOW_MISSING_DEPENDENCIES=true DIST_DIR=out/dist ./art/tools/dist_linux_bionic.sh -j80 com.android.art.host
(in the master-art-host branch)
Change-Id: I9beca73aafdf42f03bfa19cf1634b2641dac417b
This reverts commit 956305c61c.
Reason for revert: broke master-art-host branch
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: reverting a bad change
Change-Id: Id7faed4ee85328c7c65847a3543ea9e67a3d50b3
For each APEX, <apexname>-installed-files.txt is dist'ed to show the
list of files and their sizes that are included in the APEX.
Bug: 147605944
Test: m dist and examine the txt files
Change-Id: I565479523e51280fc88d5fbf8ea3f48ac0ae9fee
Previously, both overridden APEX and overriding APEX were installed
together when TARGET_FLATTEN_APEX is set to true. This was because the
Make modules for flattened APEXes are phony where
LOCAL_OVERRIDES_MODULES isn't respected.
Fixing the problem by letting apex_manifest.pb for the overriding APEX
to override all modules for the overridden APEXes.
Bug: 147384966
Test: OVERRIDE_TARGET_FLATTEN_APEX=true m dump-files | grep
mediaprovider shows
: out/target/product/coral/system/apex/com.google.android.mediaprovider/apex_manifest.pb
: out/target/product/coral/system/apex/com.google.android.mediaprovider/apex_pubkey
: out/target/product/coral/system/apex/com.google.android.mediaprovider/javalib/framework-mediaprovider.jar
: out/target/product/coral/system/apex/com.google.android.mediaprovider/lib64/libfuse.so
: out/target/product/coral/system/apex/com.google.android.mediaprovider/priv-app/MediaProvider/MediaProviderGoogle.apk
only
Change-Id: I6dc3fc7aaee0474cbad9fadbfce765be4b751328
This change fixes a bug that jacoco-report-classes-all.jar does not
include info for APK-in-APEX such as the MediaProvider apk in
com.android.mediaprovider APEX.
Firstly, LOCAL_SOONG_JACOCO_REPORT_CLASSES_JAR is correctly set also for
the APKs included in APEXes. Secondly, the Make modules for the embedded
APKs are now built with soong_app_prebuilt.mk to correctly import the
jacoco file into the Make world.
Bug: 147296855
Test: execute the following command in internal master.
$ choosecombo cf_x86_phone userdebug
$ NINJA_ARGS="-t path out/target/product/vsoc_x86/jacoco-report-classes-all.jar out/target/common/obj/ETC/MediaProvider.com.android.mediaprovider_intermediates/jacoco-report-classes.jar" EMMA_INSTRUMENT=true EMMA_INSTRUMENT_FRAMEWORK=true m
The result shows that there is a path as follows:
out/target/product/vsoc_x86/jacoco-report-classes-all.jar
out/target/product/vsoc_x86/apex/com.android.mediaprovider/priv-app/MediaProvider/MediaProvider.apk
out/target/product/vsoc_x86/obj/ETC/MediaProvider.com.android.mediaprovider_intermediates/package.apk
out/target/common/obj/ETC/MediaProvider.com.android.mediaprovider_intermediates/jacoco-report-classes.jar
Change-Id: I52d11534a34eb35219bfafca4453e75a1b701c0e
When prebuilt_apex overrides/replaces other apex, the same symlinks need
to be created as well.
Bug: 143192278
Test: 1. add prebuilt_apex with vndk apex
with overrides set as ["com.android.vndk.current"]
2. m <prebuilt apex>
3. check if vndk symlinks are created
Change-Id: I8ee9c981ea9c7202ccf5143b3f43e6848773cd63
When a module is included in an APEX and the module is not directly
installed to the system partition, the 'required' property of the module
is lost. The APEX containing the module now carries the property from
its dependencies.
Bug: 146549048
Test: m
Change-Id: Ie21cc7b8420c6126c855e66c2363644de4a7ef42
It will be used to build a shim apex with zeroed hashtree for use in CTS
tests.
Test: builds
Bug: 145670581
Change-Id: I6f84850fefb3b58a1c2e8328242920d64a61e733
Bug: 144477678
Test: verified that apex_build_info.pb is populated and included in the
final apex.
Change-Id: Iecbc2a68a82595eee32aaa26d11a7253daf89f69
We need to have a way to see the list of modules that directly or
indirectly contribute to an APEX. People find it difficult to determine
whether a module is included in which APEXes because APEX tracks
indirect dependencies as well as direct dependencies. Therefore, just
looking at Android.bp for the APEX itself doesn't give the answer.
This change adds a new make target <apex_name>-deps-info, which
generates out/soong/<apex_name>-deps-info.txt file that shows the
internal and external dependencies of the said APEX.
Here, internal means the dependencies are actually part of the
APEX, while external means the dependencies are still external to the
APEX.
Bug: 146323213
Test: m (apex_test amended)
Change-Id: I33d1ccf5d1ca335d71cd6ced0f5f66b8c3886d13
Some devices require VNDK using core library list, but this is dependent
to system image rather than VNDK version. This change removes VNDK using
core variant library list file from VNDK APEX, and also remove VNDK
version from its filename.
Bug: 142599349
Test: m -j passed && aosp_cf_x86_go_phone booted
Change-Id: Ibc53b8dfc9d38e14bbaa878154034d25a6d34089
Create an APEX variation of a module only when it is either directly
included in an APEX or the dependency to the module demands that the
module should be included. For example, a non-static dependency to a
java library no longer creates an APEX variant of the library.
Bug: 146907857
Test: m (apex_test amended)
Test: cat out/soong/build.ninja | grep "Module:" | wc -l
reduced from 47132 to 45881
Change-Id: Icd79fb4b60668d852b9f018343b934b5e42a8eda
Permission XML file for java_sdk_library is generated by
java_sdk_library itself now.
And, build rule is switched to android.WriteFile since "echo -e" is
not supported from build server. (-e is printed to output)
Bug: 145474221
Test: m com.android.cronet and check its permissions xml file
also, m org.chromium.net.cronet.xml (created dynamically)
Change-Id: Iffb119151c49bc4fe6c4386fa267cca193f37dbc
Two APEXes (i18n, art) requires compat symlinks and these symlinks are
created via ld.config.txt module's POST_INSTALL_CMDS.
$ m installclean
$ m ld.config.txt
$ tree $OUT/system
.../system
├── bin
│ ├── dalvikvm -> /apex/com.android.art/bin/dalvikvm
│ └── dex2oat -> /apex/com.android.art/bin/dex2oat
├── etc
│ └── ld.config.txt
└── usr
└── icu -> /apex/com.android.i18n/etc/icu
By the way, ld.config.txt is going to removed since linkerconfig
generates it on device.
So, we're moving symlink creation from ld.config.txt(rootdir/Android.mk)
to APEXes' POST_INSTALL_CMDS.
$ m installclean
$ m com.android.i18n
$ tree $OUT/system
.../system
├── apex
│ └── com.android.i18n.apex
└── usr
└── icu -> /apex/com.android.i18n/etc/icu
$ m installclean
$ m com.android.art
$ tree $OUT/system
.../system
├── apex
│ └── com.android.art.debug.apex
├── bin
│ ├── dalvikvm -> /apex/com.android.art/bin/dalvikvm
│ └── dex2oat -> /apex/com.android.art/bin/dex2oat
Bug: 143192278
Test: m && boot (since these two apexes are bootstrap apexes)
Change-Id: Ib29ea9f9ac40e74f78cd530e7daef8c51292fd24
java_import doesn't support dex jar which is necessary to be packaged in
an APEX. Supporting this would require non-trivial work. By the way
java_import is not used and there is a workaround.(defining java_library
and static-linking with it)
We drop the support for `java_import` in APEX.
Bug: 139175488
Test: m (soong tests amended)
Change-Id: I924386571079090c701276d87f665ce7fbb6f074
When a java_sdk_library module is added, both impl jar and permission
xml files are packaged together.
For example, when a java_sdk_library "foo" is listed, following two
entries will be in an APEX package.
/javalibs/foo.jar
/etc/permissions/foo.xml
Bug: 145474221
Test: m com.android.cronet
deapexer list com.android.cronet.apex
Change-Id: If5883c02255e9309f20810b1532d3fbe73bf4e95
Effectively adds the cc_defaults module type to the set that are
registered for tests that rely on cc default deps so needed to remove
a few references of that.
Test: m checkbuild
Bug: 146540677
Change-Id: I9df3d33a0cf3f6b22d270efed8366d0183eccaec
This fixes an issue that arises when deduping cc build component
registration code.
The sanitize_runtime_deps and sanitize_runtime post deps mutators were
not previously added when running cc tests. That meant the tests were
not actually testing the same behavior as at runtime.
Adding the mutators breaks the TestFuzzTarget test as the mutator adds
libclang_rt.ubsan_standalone-aarch64-android as a dependency of libc++
and the former is not available.
This fixes the test by adding the missing dependency as a cc prebuilt
shared library.
Test: m checkbuild
Bug: 146540677
Change-Id: Ie13c7e6fcefef7d9cb1cc5364be3dc563ce40de5
The cc.GatherRequiredDepsForTest() method returns some default module
definitions that are required when using cc module types like
cc_library. Previously, the registration of the module types and
mutators needed to process those default definitions was duplicated
in the test config initialization.
This change removes that duplicated code and replaces it with calls
to cc.RegisterRequiredBuildComponentsForTest(ctx) which registers all
the required build components.
Test: m checkbuild
Bug: 146540677
Change-Id: I80b6913c5691ff164ce9d308b9e1da24940f2d42
The registration of module types and singletons is duplicated between
init() functions that register them for use in the build runtime and
test context creation code that registers them for testing.
This is a proof of concept for a mechanism that will allow the code
to be shared. It defines a RegistrationContext interface that is
implemented by both the TestContext and the new initRegistrationContext
type. An instance of the the latter is available through the
InitRegistrationContext variable.
The intent is that the registration of the module types and singleton
types will be extracted from the init() function into a separate
function that takes a RegistrationContext parameter. That method is
called from init() passing in the InitRegistrationContext and from a
test passing in the TestContext. Something like this:
func init() {
RegisterBuildComponents(android.InitRegistrationContext)
}
func RegisterBuildComponents(ctx android.RegistrationContext) {
ctx.RegisterModuleType(....)
....
}
A test would do something like this:
ctx := android.NewTestContext()
RegisterBuildComponents(ctx)
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: I97173cabb6d6cf7ce98fdb5f73418438b1997b35
It's not yet supported by bundletool and blocks other testing (see
attached bug).
This is a partial revert of
https://android-review.googlesource.com/c/platform/build/soong/+/1183459/
Test: out/dist/mainline_modules_arm64/com.android.tzdata-base.zip
Test: checked content doesn't have apex_pubkey
Bug: 146460014
Change-Id: I268caa9f9736ba1913145a1ce1065f6f5179a6db
The filesystem object was available through ModuleContext.Fs(), but
gives too much access to the filesystem without enforicing correct
dependencies. In order to support sandboxing the soong_build
process move the filesystem into the Config. The next change will
make it private.
Bug: 146437378
Test: all Soong tests
Change-Id: I5d3ae9108f120fd335b21efd612aefa078378813
Run the imageMutator between osMutator and archMutator so that
different arch variants can be set for the different partitions.
Bug: 142286466
Test: m checkbuild
Change-Id: I65d05714b75aa462bf9816da60fdc2deda4de593
Merged-In: I65d05714b75aa462bf9816da60fdc2deda4de593
(cherry picked from commit 9c8f687584)
The rules for apex certificate:
1. <unspecified>: use <default app cerficicate>
2. name: use <default app cerficiate dir>/<name>(.x509.pem|.pk8)
3. :module: use specified by <module>
Certificates can be overridden by PRODUCT_CERTIFICATE_OVERRIDES.
Currently, 1) and 2) aren't overridden by PRODUCT_CERTIFICATE_OVERRIDES,
which should be.
Bug: n/a
Test: m (apex_test.go amended)
Change-Id: Icbdf4979613ef10127ecc02f3debd6a798460532
In case that an apex module depends on a module with stubs directly
*and* indirectly, the build system should follow the deps graph further.
Note that WalkDeps() visits deps in DFS and it won't visit again visited
modules.
Bug: n/a
Test: m (apex_test.go amended)
Change-Id: I1a6f135dbda6d1eb641575a3fbbc9bbee0622076
This change fixes a bug that LOCAL_PATH for modules included in an APEX
is set to the path of the APEX bundle, not to the path of the embedded
module. For example, LOCAL_PATH of libconscrypt included in
com.android.adbd was set to /system/core/adb instead of
/external/boringssl. This caused a problem that NOTICE file in
/external/boringssl is not tagged to libconscrypt, but the NOTICE file
for adbd is.
Fixing the problem by recording the module directories of the included
modules and emitting it in LOCAL_PATH.
Bug: 145347092
Test: Settings -> About Phone -> Legal Information -> Third-party
license. The license for /apex/com.android.adbd/lib64/libconscrypt.so is
OpenSSL.
Change-Id: I76f1830d5a10af63fa74dcc2a42730ffabb8c4ed
Use the empty string for the core image variant so that modules
added to imageMutator do not change their build directory.
Bug: 142286466
Test: m checkbuild
Change-Id: Ida4534d9a4d6176236aaa480fed359ce27acfaa1
Merged-In: Ida4534d9a4d6176236aaa480fed359ce27acfaa1
(cherry picked from commit 72d685ee7f45e5393be44ae4159edf083ac918de)
APEXes with "legacy_android10_support" will have apex_manifest.json for
compatibility as well as apex_manifest.pb.
Bug: 143951586
Test: m (soong tests)
Change-Id: I019252aee5a9423f4b180ba1026e6e99c9961437
AndroidMkEntries now returns multiple AndroidMkEntires so that a module
can emit multiple Make modules if needed.
Bug: 128708192
Test: m
Change-Id: I56b6f76d22943b80329951c5acb80a1b932441ad
The two were missing.
Bug: 145678884
Test: m out/dist/mainline_modules_arm64/com.android.tzdata-base.zip and
inspect the content
Change-Id: I7e244561f59e5adce56b6a64f363a413faa106f2
Move the ImageMutator to be registered just after the archMutator
in preparation for moving it between osMutator and archMutator.
Requries updating variants in a few tests that now run the
ImageMutator.
Bug: 142286466
Test: no change to build.ninja
Test: all soong tests
Change-Id: Ia9d2a7bc0e225bedec3c9a83ea04f471a931bf47
GSI targets are supposed to have both 'flattened' and 'unflattened'
APEXes. By adding 'flattened' APEX as REQUIRED moduled for 'unflattened'
APEX, both will be installed togetther.
This is done by a new variable PRODUCT_INSTALL_EXTRA_FLATTENED_APEXES,
which is set only for GSI targets.
Bug: 137802149
Test: lunch aosp_arm64-userdebug && m
resulting apex images under /system/apex
and flattened apexes under /system/system_ext/apex
Change-Id: I336e2674e427b358542e0045b2a49dfa3d84095b
This change fixes the problem that when an apex module is overridden by
another override_apex, the <apex_name>-file_contexts are duplicated when
creating the system-level file-contexts.
Fixing this by not emitting the file_context info for the overridden
apex.
In doing so, OverridableModule interface was extended to have
GetOverriddenBy() method which can be used to test whether a module is
an overridden one or not.
Bug: 144338929
Test: m (apex_test amended)
Test: add "override_apex {name:"com.googlge.android.tzdata",
Change-Id: I5e9401c32899bb9987c90cba4185f571dc1a87f0
base:"com.android.tzdata"}" and the build is successful
When flattened, the Make module for an APEX is a phony package for the
files in it. There is no output (either implcit or explicit) there.
Bug: 144338929
Test: m
Test: check the generated Android-<target>.mk file
Change-Id: I86df3b69f402a7e2d94bafa39f2aad3312d8c28b
Previously, it was defaultable only for cc_library. Now, it is
defaultable for all module types.
Bug: 128708192
Test: m
Change-Id: If248f593da6f4b724bf889ccd7f2e077d48069b5
This change is to make it easier to add new fields to the struct.
transitiveDep field is added to distinguish apexFiles coming from
transitive dependencies of the APEX. We will later use the info to
reduce the size of bundled APEXes by replacing the transitive deps with
symlinks to the corresponding files in the system partition outside of
the APEX.
Bug: 144533348
Test: m
Change-Id: I283859f2f2f1b5cfb3025569f168ba8569b22bb9
This build rule is specific to platform APEXes.
For non-platform APEXes, MakeAsSystemExt() is not applied.
This fixes the cases of "soc_specific: true" apexes which fails to
build.
Bug: 139053989
Test: m nothing (soong tests)
Change-Id: I98d0257499647ab41cdaa62a3671d89addbdf833
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: got +1 before rebasing
Avoid having to pass ModuleFactoryAdaptor to every call to
RegisterModuleType in a test by wrapping RegisterModuleType.
Test: all soong tests
Change-Id: If8847d16487de0479cc3020b728256922b3cadba
When an override_apex named Foo overrides an apex module named Bar, the
Make modules from Foo have Foo as their suffix. Previously the suffix
was Bar for both of the overriding and the overridden APEXes, causing
name conflicts in the Make side.
Bug: 144338929
Test: apex_test.go
Change-Id: I1396910ab294ba5f5e0585af6d37f1eab9460250
For platform APEXes, file_contexts should point a file under
/system/sepolicy.
Bug: 144732805
Test: m
Change-Id: Ib2d5db715bbebc80a6178d1c42e387b268cc4a0d
prebult_etc module type does not respect prefer32, i.e. its primary arch
is 64-bit on 64/32-bit device even when built with TARGET_PREFER_32_BIT
is true. However, the apex module type respects prefer32 and therefore
when TARGET_PREFER_32_BIT is true its primary arch becomes 32-bit. Then
the problem is that the apex tries to depend on 32-bit variant of the
prebuilt_etc modules which don't exist.
Fixing the problem by force using the first arch of the device when
adding dependencies to prebuilt_etc modules.
Bug: 144532908
Test: choosecombo 1 aosp_arm64 userdebug; TARGET_PREFER_32_BIT=true m;
Change-Id: I7642c57b05a837495587bbe4d3589d8549607862
Prepare for making the image mutator available to all modules and
moving it between the os and arch mutators by moving it into the
android package and using an interface implemented by the module
types to control it.
Bug: 142286466
Test: No unexpected changes to out/soong/build.ninja
Change-Id: I0dcc9c7b5ec80edffade340c367f6ae4da34151b
override_apex module type is used to override existing apex module with
certain properties overridden. Currently, only the 'apps' property is
overridable.
Bug: 144338929
Test: m
Change-Id: Ic050b062093cda29ce78126cc92dd6097647f7db
apex.go is too big. Separate the build rule and android.mk generation
logic into builder.go and androidmk.go, respectively. prebuilt_apex is
moved to prebuilt.go as well.
No refactoring has been made other than the splitting.
Test: m
Change-Id: I839ab0a1ba2b70ce82d98ac1fa8e3534808b5fd3
APEXes are ETC type, which should be overridden via
LOCAL_OVERRIDES_MODULES. This change fixes a bug that
LOCAL_OVERRIDES_PACKAGES was used for APEXes.
Bug: 140792287
Test: m
Test: add com.google.android.tzdata to PRODUCT_PACKAGES and build.
/system/apex/com.google.android.tzdata.apex exists, but
/system/apex/com.android.tzdata.apex doesn't.
Change-Id: Id65743b36e0b706d6ffd8cae0597cc0a42a83fb7
If some apex module can be installed for both flattened and unflattened,
flattened apex should be installed to system_ext partition.
So add MakeAsSystemExt func to change the partition from system to
system_ext.
Bug: 139053989
Test: m -j
Change-Id: I3e3430413a9045d96130af99e249567b1a26ed7e
If a JNI lib is depended on by an APK that is included in an APEX, the
lib is embedded inside the APK.
This change also fixes a bug that APKs are not mutated for APEXes.
Bug: 144135069
Test: m (apex_test.go amended)
Change-Id: I21ac24412b30c05afc03385655c6b196130dffe3
Treehugger Robot